25.12.2014 Views

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

Prime pagine RA2010FUS:Copia di Layout 1 - ENEA - Fusione

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

086<br />

progress report<br />

2010<br />

12.500 litres (correspon<strong>di</strong>ng to more than 230 hours of operation) have been produced by the Linde liquefier,<br />

while the remaining 10.700 litres have been purchased to compensate for the system losses. The resulting<br />

average recovery efficiency is estimated to be about 53.8%, less than that recorded in 2009 (when about 65.5%<br />

was recovered). Such a low recovery efficiency is partially due to some deman<strong>di</strong>ng experiments carried out by<br />

the Superconductivity laboratory, which may occasionally require considerable amounts of refrigerant to be<br />

evaporated in a very short time, thus making both the capacity of the gas bag (5 m 3 ) and the throughput of<br />

the recovery compressors (80 m 3 /hr), inadequate. Moreover, during about six months of 2010, the recovery<br />

system was operating with only one of its two compressors, due to maintenance being performed in turn on<br />

both machines, as it is necessary after 15.000 hours of operation. This resulted in a reduced recovery<br />

throughput of only 40 m 3 /h and therefore in losses larger than usual.<br />

Data from independent gas counters in the (separated) recovery lines of each user allowed, throughout 2010,<br />

the <strong>di</strong>fferent recovery efficiencies to be <strong>di</strong>sentangled by FTU and Superconductivity laboratory. As a matter of<br />

fact, by comparing the amounts of liquid helium delivered and of gas recovered by Superconductivity<br />

laboratories and FTU it is possible to evaluate the percentage of total helium lost by each user.<br />

References<br />

[3.1] G. Ramogida et al., Final report on the analysis of the ITER <strong>di</strong>vertor cassettes, Contract EFDA/07/1702–1596<br />

(TW6–TVD–DIAGAN), <strong>ENEA</strong> Internal Report FUS–TN–DI–R–009/Rev.1, (October 2010)<br />

[3.2] G. Ramogida et al., Final report on the preliminary electro–magnetic load analysis for the design of a blanket<br />

manifold pipe concept for ITER, Contract EFDA/07/1702–1620 (TW6–TVB–MANEM), <strong>ENEA</strong> Internal Report FUS–<br />

TN–BB–R–034/Rev.1, (December 2010)<br />

[3.3] S. Tosti et al., Conceptual PFD of HTW processing, KIT Report TLK–CEW–0990PMT1–RD–0D02–01, 5 (May 2010)<br />

[3.4] C. Rizzello et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 58–63 (2010)<br />

[3.5] M. D’Arienzo et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 2288–2291 (2010)<br />

[3.6] F. Borgognoni et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 85, 2171–2175 (2010)<br />

[3.7] A. Santucci et al., A comparison study of highly tritiated water decomposition processes, Presented at the 9th<br />

International Conference on Tritium Science and Technology – Tritium (Nara, Japan 2010)<br />

[3.8] P. Rossi et al., Ultimate tensile strength testing campaign on ITER pre–compression ring mock–ups, Presented<br />

at the 26th Symposium on Fusion Technology – SOFT (Porto 2010) and to appear in Fusion Eng. Des.<br />

[3.9] F. Crescenzi et al., Mechanical characterization of glass fibre–epoxy composite material for ITER<br />

pre–compression rings, Presented at the 26th Symposium on Fusion Technology – SOFT (Porto 2010) and to<br />

appear in Fusion Eng. Des.<br />

[3.10] L. Petrizzi, F. Moro, Final report on ITER <strong>di</strong>agnostic port integration: <strong>di</strong>agnostic port plug engineering and<br />

integration, <strong>ENEA</strong> Internal Report FUS TN GE–VD–Q–001, Contract: FU06 CT 2006–00134 (EFDA/06–1432),<br />

(February 2010)<br />

[3.11] F. Moro et al., Neutronic calculations in support of the design of the ITER high resolution neutron spectrometer,<br />

Presented at the 26th Symposium on Fusion Technology – SOFT (Porto 2010) and to appear in Fusion Eng.<br />

Des.<br />

[3.12] R. Villari, L. Petrizzi, G. Brolatti, Three–<strong>di</strong>mensional neutronic analysis of the ITER in–vessel coils, Final Report<br />

of the Contract ITER/CT/09/4100001120, deliverable D2-2 (November 2010)<br />

[3.13] R. Villari et al., Three–<strong>di</strong>mensional neutronic analysis of the ITER in–vessel coils, Presented at the 26th<br />

Symposium on Fusion Technology – SOFT (Porto 2010) and to appear in Fusion Eng. Des.<br />

[3.14] R. Villari, L. Petrizzi, Neutron and gamma spectra behind ITER blanket modules and in <strong>di</strong>vertor, Final Report of<br />

the Contract ITER/CT/09/4100001120, deliverable D1–1 (March 2010)<br />

[3.15] R. Villari, L. Petrizzi, Neutronic analysis of ITER <strong>di</strong>vertor rails, Final Report of the Contract<br />

ITER/CT/09/4100001120, deliverable D2–1 (April 2010)<br />

[3.16] D. Marocco, B. Esposito, F. Moro, Combined unfol<strong>di</strong>ng and spatial inversion of neutron camera measurements<br />

for ion temperature profile determination in ITER, to appear in Nucl. Fusion<br />

[3.17] V. Cocilovo, M.T. Porfiri, R. De Angelis, A channel facility for ITER safety relevant dust mobilization stu<strong>di</strong>es,<br />

Presented at the 19th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy – TOFE (Las Vegas 2010)<br />

[3.18] L. Di Pace et al., Application of PACTITER v3.3 to the ACPs assessment of ITER neutral beam injectors primary<br />

heat transfer system, Presented at the 19th Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy, – TOFE (Las<br />

Vegas 2010)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!