26.12.2014 Views

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 NOTHING MAT(T)ERS<br />

Another solution is the rapture <strong>of</strong> irrationality. If Apollo 32 is phallogocentric and<br />

onto-theological, Dionysus is the postmodernist hero. Postmodern feminists believe<br />

Dionysus is going to smash patriarchy. However, Dionysus was also a Greek tyrant,<br />

(Elder 367 B.C., Younger 345 B.C.) Some feminists have been sold a bill <strong>of</strong> goods/<br />

gods. They become the bacchae. As Mary Daly argues, “Madness is the only<br />

ecstasy <strong>of</strong>fered to women by the Dionysian ‘Way’” (1978, p. 66). Do they celebrate<br />

patriarchal chaos and the death <strong>of</strong> Apollo because they are more terrified <strong>of</strong> rational<br />

than irrational man Do they not remember that Dionysus and Apollo shared the<br />

same shrine 33 <strong>Postmodernism</strong> is patriarchal ideology. The particular cosmogony is<br />

Dionysian and Apollonian: the disorder <strong>of</strong> the unconscious, the possession <strong>of</strong> all<br />

women by phallic logos, the symbol and word <strong>of</strong> God in all things, the word from<br />

nothing making all things. Unemotionality and irrationality are one, as their reason<br />

and emotion are, in fact, One. Apollo/Dionysus is just another v<strong>ers</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> what Sheila<br />

Ruth has described as a Janus-faced image <strong>of</strong> masculinity: “on the one hand, the<br />

warrior hero, a compilation <strong>of</strong> classical ideas and warrior qualities; on the other<br />

hand, the machismo syndrome, the undercurrent <strong>of</strong> mischief, composed <strong>of</strong> a<br />

predilection for violence, intemperate and exploitative sex, and recklessness” (1980,<br />

p. 49). Dionysian loss <strong>of</strong> self as liberation is another ruse <strong>of</strong> masculinist reason. 34<br />

Faceless masks do not change a master narrative, they are the master’s normative,<br />

when deceit is truth. Femininity as the textual imaginary 35 <strong>of</strong> male uncertainty is<br />

used to seduce women. Dionysus the Possessor seeks to erase women’s boundaries<br />

and territories. He is an “androgynous” man who pretends to mediate between the<br />

feminine world and the world <strong>of</strong> the Father. The previous querelle des femmes which<br />

lasted from 1300 to 1600 was a quarrel over the question <strong>of</strong> whether woman was<br />

human. Now, humanism is passé and feminists are accused <strong>of</strong> both that and<br />

logocentricism, but woman is still the anti-human. The male definition <strong>of</strong> woman<br />

and human as without centre is posed as the way out <strong>of</strong> humanism, master narratives<br />

and logocentricism. But women can’t keep up like men, can’t keep up with their<br />

style.<br />

In “The Menace <strong>of</strong> Dionysus: Sex Roles and Rev<strong>ers</strong>als in Euripedes’ Bacchae,”<br />

Charles Segal mentions that Dionysus and Pentheus symbolize different masculine<br />

approaches to the feminine and the chaotic. However, we can see that both are twice<br />

born, and have difficult relationships with their moth<strong>ers</strong>, the sist<strong>ers</strong> Semele and<br />

32. Mary Daly draws on research which shows that Apollo’s name is derived from The Destroyer.<br />

As the King <strong>of</strong> woman-hat<strong>ers</strong>, he killed the dragoness “Delphyne” (from “womb”), usurped her<br />

shrine and built a temple where the maxim was engraved, “Keep woman under the rule” (1978,<br />

p. 62).<br />

33. See also Mary Daly, (1978, pp. 64–69), “The Illusion <strong>of</strong> ‘Dionysian’ Freedom”. She points to<br />

female annihilation, madness and confusion as the Dionysian Final Solution for women.<br />

34. Mary O’Brien consid<strong>ers</strong> the laws negotiating family and polity historically, and notes that the<br />

laws <strong>of</strong> Solon, for example: were “concurrent with religious developments in which the old chthonic<br />

and fertility cults had been consciously replaced by the Olympic heavenly patriarchs, and lifeprocess<br />

celebrations in which women participated were ‘rationalized’ in the all-male mathematical<br />

mysteries <strong>of</strong> Orpheus and the intoxicated liturgies <strong>of</strong> Dionysus” (1981, p. 108).<br />

35. In her study <strong>of</strong> sadistic novelists, Dardigna concludes: “Women become textual material for the<br />

masculine imaginary: thus do we enter contemporary eroticism” (1981, p. 40).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!