Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism
Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism
Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A SPACE ODYSSEY 15<br />
self-perpetuating. Incest is the taboo which is the corn<strong>ers</strong>tone <strong>of</strong> social relations.<br />
Lacan would go even further: the Oedipal taboo is the origin <strong>of</strong> the superego, <strong>of</strong> the<br />
individual as well as the cultural superego <strong>of</strong> the collectivity. For Lévi-Strauss, truth<br />
is scientific and natural, not historical and dialectical. Like Rousseau, Lévi-Strauss<br />
believed that whatever is univ<strong>ers</strong>ally true must be natural. However, since nothing<br />
remains to be done, this ultimate truth can only be redemonstrated. The univ<strong>ers</strong>al<br />
absorbs everything, and history is replaced by nature. This is explicit in Lévi-<br />
Strauss’ attack on existentialism: “Structuralism, unlike the kind <strong>of</strong> philosophy<br />
which restricts the dialectic to human history and bans it from the natural order,<br />
readily admits that the ideas it formulates in psychological terms may be no more<br />
than fumbling approximations to organic or even physical truths” (1966, p. 689). Or<br />
as Descartes wrote in 1641, “the idea <strong>of</strong> God, which is in us, must have God as its<br />
cause” (1958, p. 173). The father <strong>of</strong> French philosophy was demonstrating his theory<br />
<strong>of</strong> the separation between mind and body, and the existence <strong>of</strong> God: “By the name<br />
God I mean a substance that is infinite, immutable, independent, all-knowing, allpowerful,<br />
and by which I myself and everything else, if any such other things there<br />
be, have been created” (1958, p. 204). Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy,<br />
in which the existence <strong>of</strong> God and the distinction in man <strong>of</strong> soul and body are<br />
demonstrated, reformulated but centred on Augustine’s problem <strong>of</strong> knowledge and<br />
conv<strong>ers</strong>ation with reason: I desire to know God and the soul. <strong>Nothing</strong> more<br />
Absolutely nothing. 16 Three centuries later, this idea is modernized: structure is God,<br />
and the binary code is His Word: light/dark, heaven/earth, male/ female. Structure is<br />
the new inhuman objectivity, but it is also a historically masculine und<strong>ers</strong>tanding <strong>of</strong><br />
matter.<br />
A fear <strong>of</strong> life and a disembodied approach to nature is an important characteristic<br />
<strong>of</strong> male history and scientific patriarchy. Man’s “paranoid somatophobia” (Scheman:<br />
1982) can be traced to Descartes, who demonstrated the isolation <strong>of</strong> the male self,<br />
the existence <strong>of</strong> a detached ego without connectedness to the natural world. Cogito<br />
ergo sum expressed the distrust <strong>of</strong> the body and the senses felt by a self that would<br />
only know the natural world through science. Science is the attempt at und<strong>ers</strong>tanding<br />
through separation. Indeed, disengagement and distance are the Nietzschean<br />
preconditions for illumination and greatness. These epistemological and ontological<br />
formulations have remained at the centre <strong>of</strong> subsequent French philosophy. And so<br />
has god, even when he has been declared dead, for he reincarnates as discarnate<br />
structure, language and nothingness. Structure is the body <strong>of</strong> this apparition;<br />
language is the mind and nothingness is the soul.<br />
What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> the declaration <strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> all absolutes, the assertion<br />
<strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> the Father Freud und<strong>ers</strong>tood the critical importance <strong>of</strong> the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> metaphysics for man’s desire and law. According to Lacan, the success <strong>of</strong><br />
Freud’s Totem and Taboo is to write the only modern myth possible: “The myth <strong>of</strong><br />
the murder <strong>of</strong> the father is clearly the myth <strong>of</strong> a time for which God is dead” (1986,<br />
p. 209). The only material in Lacan is murder, in his view, the original Freudian<br />
16. Deum et animam scire cupio. Nihilne plus Nihil omnino. From Soliloquiorum, lib. I, cap. II, in<br />
Descartes (1958, p. ix).