26.12.2014 Views

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

Nothing Mat(t)ers: A Feminist Critique of Postmodernism

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A SPACE ODYSSEY 15<br />

self-perpetuating. Incest is the taboo which is the corn<strong>ers</strong>tone <strong>of</strong> social relations.<br />

Lacan would go even further: the Oedipal taboo is the origin <strong>of</strong> the superego, <strong>of</strong> the<br />

individual as well as the cultural superego <strong>of</strong> the collectivity. For Lévi-Strauss, truth<br />

is scientific and natural, not historical and dialectical. Like Rousseau, Lévi-Strauss<br />

believed that whatever is univ<strong>ers</strong>ally true must be natural. However, since nothing<br />

remains to be done, this ultimate truth can only be redemonstrated. The univ<strong>ers</strong>al<br />

absorbs everything, and history is replaced by nature. This is explicit in Lévi-<br />

Strauss’ attack on existentialism: “Structuralism, unlike the kind <strong>of</strong> philosophy<br />

which restricts the dialectic to human history and bans it from the natural order,<br />

readily admits that the ideas it formulates in psychological terms may be no more<br />

than fumbling approximations to organic or even physical truths” (1966, p. 689). Or<br />

as Descartes wrote in 1641, “the idea <strong>of</strong> God, which is in us, must have God as its<br />

cause” (1958, p. 173). The father <strong>of</strong> French philosophy was demonstrating his theory<br />

<strong>of</strong> the separation between mind and body, and the existence <strong>of</strong> God: “By the name<br />

God I mean a substance that is infinite, immutable, independent, all-knowing, allpowerful,<br />

and by which I myself and everything else, if any such other things there<br />

be, have been created” (1958, p. 204). Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy,<br />

in which the existence <strong>of</strong> God and the distinction in man <strong>of</strong> soul and body are<br />

demonstrated, reformulated but centred on Augustine’s problem <strong>of</strong> knowledge and<br />

conv<strong>ers</strong>ation with reason: I desire to know God and the soul. <strong>Nothing</strong> more<br />

Absolutely nothing. 16 Three centuries later, this idea is modernized: structure is God,<br />

and the binary code is His Word: light/dark, heaven/earth, male/ female. Structure is<br />

the new inhuman objectivity, but it is also a historically masculine und<strong>ers</strong>tanding <strong>of</strong><br />

matter.<br />

A fear <strong>of</strong> life and a disembodied approach to nature is an important characteristic<br />

<strong>of</strong> male history and scientific patriarchy. Man’s “paranoid somatophobia” (Scheman:<br />

1982) can be traced to Descartes, who demonstrated the isolation <strong>of</strong> the male self,<br />

the existence <strong>of</strong> a detached ego without connectedness to the natural world. Cogito<br />

ergo sum expressed the distrust <strong>of</strong> the body and the senses felt by a self that would<br />

only know the natural world through science. Science is the attempt at und<strong>ers</strong>tanding<br />

through separation. Indeed, disengagement and distance are the Nietzschean<br />

preconditions for illumination and greatness. These epistemological and ontological<br />

formulations have remained at the centre <strong>of</strong> subsequent French philosophy. And so<br />

has god, even when he has been declared dead, for he reincarnates as discarnate<br />

structure, language and nothingness. Structure is the body <strong>of</strong> this apparition;<br />

language is the mind and nothingness is the soul.<br />

What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> the declaration <strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> all absolutes, the assertion<br />

<strong>of</strong> the death <strong>of</strong> the Father Freud und<strong>ers</strong>tood the critical importance <strong>of</strong> the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> metaphysics for man’s desire and law. According to Lacan, the success <strong>of</strong><br />

Freud’s Totem and Taboo is to write the only modern myth possible: “The myth <strong>of</strong><br />

the murder <strong>of</strong> the father is clearly the myth <strong>of</strong> a time for which God is dead” (1986,<br />

p. 209). The only material in Lacan is murder, in his view, the original Freudian<br />

16. Deum et animam scire cupio. Nihilne plus Nihil omnino. From Soliloquiorum, lib. I, cap. II, in<br />

Descartes (1958, p. ix).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!