28.12.2014 Views

JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States - Defense ...

JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States - Defense ...

JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States - Defense ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter IV<br />

subordinate JFC will accomplish Service ADCON. This relationship is appropriate when<br />

stability, continuity, economy, ease <strong>of</strong> long-range planning, and <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> operations<br />

dictate organizational integrity <strong>of</strong> Service <strong>for</strong>ces <strong>for</strong> conducting operations.<br />

See Paragraph 8, “Service Component Commands,” <strong>for</strong> more in<strong>for</strong>mation on Service<br />

component commands.<br />

(3) The JFC can establish functional component commands to conduct operations.<br />

Functional component commands are appropriate when <strong>for</strong>ces from two or more Military<br />

Departments must operate within <strong>the</strong> same mission area or physical domain or <strong>the</strong>re is a need<br />

to accomplish a distinct aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> assigned mission. Joint <strong>for</strong>ce land, air, maritime, and<br />

SO component commanders are examples <strong>of</strong> functional components. (Note: Functional<br />

component commanders are component commanders <strong>of</strong> a joint <strong>for</strong>ce and do not constitute a<br />

“joint <strong>for</strong>ce command” with <strong>the</strong> authorities and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> a JFC, even when<br />

employing <strong>for</strong>ces from two or more Military Departments.) When a functional component<br />

command employs <strong>for</strong>ces from more than one Service, <strong>the</strong> functional component<br />

commander’s staff should include Service representatives from each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> employed Service<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces to aid in understanding those Service capabilities and maximizing <strong>the</strong> effective<br />

employment <strong>of</strong> Service <strong>for</strong>ces. Joint staff billets <strong>for</strong> needed expertise and individuals to fill<br />

those billets should be identified. Those individuals should be used when <strong>the</strong> functional<br />

component command is <strong>for</strong>med <strong>for</strong> exercises, contingency planning, or actual operations.<br />

See Paragraph 9, “Functional Component Commands,” <strong>for</strong> more in<strong>for</strong>mation on functional<br />

component commands.<br />

(4) Normally, joint <strong>for</strong>ces are organized with a combination <strong>of</strong> Service and<br />

functional component commands with operational responsibilities. Joint <strong>for</strong>ces organized<br />

with Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and Air Force components may have SOF (if assigned)<br />

organized as a functional component. The JFC defines <strong>the</strong> authority, command<br />

relationships, and responsibilities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Service and functional component commanders;<br />

however, <strong>the</strong> Service responsibilities (i.e., administrative and logistics) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> components<br />

must be given due consideration by <strong>the</strong> JFC.<br />

(5) The JFC has full authority to assign missions, redirect ef<strong>for</strong>ts, and direct<br />

coordination among subordinate commanders. JFCs should allow Service tactical and<br />

operational assets and groupings to function generally as <strong>the</strong>y were designed and organized<br />

(e.g., carrier strike group; Marine air-ground task <strong>for</strong>ce [MAGTF]; US Air Force air and<br />

space expeditionary task <strong>for</strong>ces; US Army corps, divisions, brigade combat teams; and SO<br />

JTF). The intent is to meet <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> JFC while maintaining <strong>the</strong> tactical and<br />

operational integrity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Service organizations. The following policy <strong>for</strong> C2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>United</strong><br />

<strong>States</strong> Marine Corps tactical air (TACAIR) recognizes this and deals with MAGTF aviation<br />

during sustained operations ashore.<br />

(a) The MAGTF commander will retain OPCON <strong>of</strong> organic air assets. The<br />

primary mission <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAGTF aviation combat element is <strong>the</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAGTF<br />

ground combat element. During joint operations, <strong>the</strong> MAGTF air assets normally will be in<br />

support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> MAGTF mission. The MAGTF commander will make sorties available to <strong>the</strong><br />

IV-4 <strong>JP</strong> 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!