06.01.2015 Views

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

– 11 –<br />

2.1.2. Choosing a grating<br />

What drives the choice <strong>of</strong> one grating over another There usually needs to be some<br />

minimal spectral resolution, and some minimal wavelength coverage. For a given detector<br />

these two may be in conflict; i.e., if there are only 2000 pixels and a minimum (3-pixel)<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> 2Å is needed, then no more than about 1300Å can be covered in a single<br />

exposure. The larger the number <strong>of</strong> lines per mm, the higher the dispersion (and hence<br />

resolution) for a given order. Usually the observer also has in mind a specific wavelength<br />

region, e.g., 4000Å to 5000Å. There may still be various choices to be made. For instance, a<br />

1200 line/mm grating blazed at 4000Å and a 600 line/mm grating blazed at 8000Å may be<br />

(almost) equally good for such a project, as the 600 line/mm could be used in second order<br />

and will then have the same dispersion and effective blaze as the 1200 line grating. The<br />

primary difference is that the efficiency will fall <strong>of</strong>f much faster for the 600 line/mm grating<br />

used in second order. As stated above (Equations 5 and 6), gratings fall <strong>of</strong>f to 50% <strong>of</strong> their<br />

peak efficiency at roughly λ b /m −λ b /3 2 and λ b /m+λ b /2m 2 where λ b is the first-order blaze<br />

wavelength and m is the order. So, the 4000Å blazed 1200 line/mm grating used in first<br />

order will fall to 50% by roughly 6000Å. However, the 8000Å blazed 600 line/mm grating<br />

used in second order will fall to 50% by 5000Å. Thus most likely the first order grating<br />

would be a better choice, although one should check the efficiency curves for the specific<br />

gratings (if such are available) to make sure one is making the right choice. Furthermore, it<br />

would be easy to block unwanted light if one were operating in second order in this example,<br />

but generally it is a lot easier to perform blocking when one is operating in first order, as<br />

described above.<br />

2.2. Conventional Long-Slit Spectrographs<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> what has been discussed so far corresponds to a conventional long-slit spectrograph,<br />

the simplest type <strong>of</strong> astronomical spectrograph, and in some ways the most versatile.<br />

The spectrograph can be used to take spectra <strong>of</strong> a bright star or a faint quasar, and the<br />

long-slit <strong>of</strong>fers the capability <strong>of</strong> excellent sky subtraction. Alternatively the long-slit can<br />

be used to obtain spatially resolved spectra <strong>of</strong> extended sources, such as galaxies (enabling<br />

kinematic, abundance, and population studies) or HII regions. They are usually easy to use,<br />

with straightforward acquisition using a TV imaging the slit, although in some cases (e.g.,<br />

IMACS on Magellan, discussed below in § 2.4.1) the situation is more complicated.<br />

Table 1 provides characteristics for a number <strong>of</strong> commonly used long-slit spectrographs.<br />

Note that the resolutions are given for a 1-arcsec wide slit.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!