06.01.2015 Views

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

– 78 –<br />

as needed between sets. Finally, always check, as the data is coming in, that when you do<br />

subtract one slit (or sky <strong>of</strong>fset) position from another that you do get zero counts outside<br />

<strong>of</strong> the star. What can go wrong here, as was mentioned in § 2.5.2, is that the strengths<br />

<strong>of</strong> the OH bands vary with time. This is particularly true if clouds move in or the seeing<br />

changes between slit positions, with the result that the OH lines will not cancel entirely and<br />

reduction will be much more difficult. If this occurs, one is forced to use a shorter integration<br />

per step to find a time frame over which the sky emission is sufficiently stable.<br />

Note that even if one does have “perfect” sky subtraction <strong>of</strong> the OH spectra, the large<br />

signal in the OH lines invariably adds noise to the final reduced spectra. This is unavoidable,<br />

and makes the entire concept <strong>of</strong> defining the signal-to-noise-ratio in the NIR tricky to define,<br />

as it is bound to vary depending upon the OH spectra within a particular region.<br />

What could possibly go wrong A lot. The second author has never worked on an<br />

infrared spectrometer that didn’t <strong>of</strong>fer additional challenges which fell outside the standard<br />

operation as listed above. To keep this brief, four <strong>of</strong> the most common problems that occur<br />

will now be discussed. They include: flexure, fringing, wavelength calibration problems,<br />

and poor telluric matching. Each <strong>of</strong> these can lead to greatly reduced signal-to-noise in the<br />

spectra, far below what would be predicted by counts alone.<br />

• Flexure. No spectrograph is absolutely rigid! Flexure can be a larger issue for infrared<br />

spectrographs because the optics must be cooled to reduce the thermal background, and<br />

it is challenging to minimize the thermal conduction to the internal spectrograph bench<br />

while also minimizing the mechanical flexure between the bench and outer structure <strong>of</strong><br />

the instrument. Depending on how the instrument is mounted, when observing to the<br />

east, versus looking to the west, for instance, or as the telescope passes meridian, the<br />

internal light path will shift due to structure shifts. The amount <strong>of</strong> flexure depends<br />

on the instrument and telescope set up. Previous users or the support astronomer for<br />

the instrument can help the new user decide if this needs to be considered and how<br />

to mitigate the effects. This is best addressed during the observing, keeping telluric<br />

standards, lamps and objects on the same side <strong>of</strong> the meridian for instance.<br />

• Fringing. Optical CCDs fringe in the red wavelength regions due to interference<br />

within the surface layers <strong>of</strong> the detector; for IR spectrographs, fringing can occur due<br />

to parallel optical surfaces, such as blocking filters, in the optical path. While in<br />

principle, this should cancel out with the dome flats, due to flexure in the system and<br />

light path differences, they typically do not cancel well. Common remedies include<br />

obtaining quartz lamps at the exact same sky location as the observations. This might<br />

work and should be included in the observing plan. However, the fringes are <strong>of</strong>ten not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!