Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– 51 –<br />
can be answered given a complete catalog <strong>of</strong> sources. For a star centered in a slit with a<br />
width <strong>of</strong> 2a, the relative contamination from a star a separation s away will depend upon the<br />
seeing. We can characterize the latter by a Gaussian with a σ <strong>of</strong> 0.85f/2, where the seeing<br />
full-width-at-half-maximum is f. Following equation (8) in Filippenko (1982), the relative<br />
contribution <strong>of</strong> a nearby star is<br />
10 (∆V/−2.5) F(a, s, σ)/F(a, 0, σ)<br />
where the definition <strong>of</strong> F depends upon whether or not the second star is located partially<br />
in the slit or not. Let a1=a-s and a2=a+s if the star is in the slit (s < a). Then F =<br />
0.5(G(a1, σ) + G(a2, σ)). (Use this for the denominator as well, with a1=a2=a.) If the star<br />
is located outside <strong>of</strong> the slit (s > a) then F = 0.5(G(a1, σ) − G(a2, σ)). G(z, σ) is the<br />
standard Gaussian integral,<br />
G(z, σ) = 1 √<br />
2πσ<br />
∫ z<br />
−z<br />
e −x2 /2σ 2 dx<br />
The simplifying assumption in all <strong>of</strong> this is that the slit has been oriented perpendicular<br />
to a line between the two stars. But, this provides a mechanism in general for deciding in<br />
advance what stars in one’s program may be too crowded to observe.<br />
3.2.3. Assigning Fibers and Designing Multi-slit Masks<br />
In order to design either a fiber configuration or a multi-slit mask, one invariably runs<br />
highly customized s<strong>of</strong>tware which takes the celestial coordinates (right ascension and declination)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the objects <strong>of</strong> interest and computes optimal centers, rotation, etc. that allow<br />
the fibers to be assigned to the maximum number <strong>of</strong> objects, or the most slitlet masks to<br />
be machined without the spectral overlapping. However, a key point to remind the reader is<br />
that such instruments work only if there are alignment stars that are on the same coordinate<br />
system as the program objects. In other words, if one has produced coordinates by using<br />
catalog “X” to provide the reference frame, it would be good if the alignment stars were also<br />
drawn from the same catalog. This was much harder ten years ago than today, thanks to<br />
the large number <strong>of</strong> stars in uniform astrometric catalogs such as the 2MASS survey or the<br />
various USNO publications. The most recent <strong>of</strong> the latter is the CCD Astrograph Catalogue<br />
Part 3 (UCAC3). One advantage <strong>of</strong> the proper motion catalogs such as the UCAC3 is one<br />
can then assure that the relative proper motion between the alignment stars and the program<br />
objects are small.<br />
This point bears repeating: there is a danger to mixing and matching coordinates<br />
determined from one catalog with coordinates from another. The coordinates need to be