Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– 76 –<br />
3.3.3. Observing with a NIR Spectrometer<br />
With near-infrared observations, virtually all the steps taken in preparing and undertaking<br />
a run in the optical are included and will not be repeated here. What will be done<br />
here is a review <strong>of</strong> the few additional steps required for near-infrared spectroscopy. These<br />
steps center around the need to remove OH sky emission lines (numerous and strong, particularly<br />
in the H-band) and to correct for the absorption lines from the Earth’s atmosphere.<br />
It will not be possible to do a very thorough reduction during the night like one can with<br />
the optical, but one can still perform various checks to ensure the data will have sufficient<br />
signal-to-noise and check if most <strong>of</strong> the sky and thermal emission is being removed.<br />
The near-infrared spectroscopist is far more obsessed with airmass than the optical<br />
spectroscopist. It is advised that the observer plot out the airmass <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the objects<br />
(targets and standards) well in advance for a run. This can be done using online s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />
http://catserver.ing.iac.es/staralt/index.php. The output <strong>of</strong> this program is given in Figure<br />
21. For this run, the authors were extraordinarily lucky that two <strong>of</strong> the telluric standards<br />
from the Hanson et al. (2005) catalog were well suited to be observed during a recent SOAR<br />
run: HD 146624 during the first half, and HD 171149 during the second half. Looking at<br />
this diagram, one can make the best choices about when to observe the telluric standard<br />
relative to any observations made <strong>of</strong> a target object. If the target observations take about<br />
30 minutes (this includes total real time, such as acquisition and integration) then observing<br />
Telluric Object 1 just before the program target during the early part <strong>of</strong> the night will mean<br />
the target star will pass through the exact same airmass during its observations, optimizing<br />
a telluric match. Later in the night, Object 3 can also be used, though observed after the<br />
target. As hour angle increases, airmass increases quickly. Note the non-linear values <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ordinate on the right <strong>of</strong> Figure 21. One must be ready to move quickly to a telluric standard<br />
or the final spectra may be quite disappointing. This observer has been known to trace in<br />
red pen in real time on such a diagram, the sources being observed as time progresses, to<br />
know when it is time to move between object and telluric and vice versa. The goal should<br />
be to observe the telluric standard when its airmass is within 0.1 <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong> the observation<br />
<strong>of</strong> the program object.<br />
How to select telluric standards As was mentioned in § 2.5.2, early-A dwarfs or solar<br />
analogues are typically used. Ideally, one should seek telluric standards which are bright (for<br />
shorter integration times), have normal spectral types (no anomalies), and are not binaries<br />
(visible or spectroscopic). But also, location in the sky is important. Referring back to<br />
Figure 21 again, stars passing close to zenith at meridian have a different functional form<br />
to their airmass curves than do stars that remain low even during transit. This can make it<br />
hard to catch both target and telluric at the same airmass if their curves are very different.