06.01.2015 Views

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 73 –<br />

A bright star was seen just to the upper left. The gripper was then moved to a second<br />

FOP. Again a bright star was seen just to the upper left. These must be the alignment<br />

stars. The operator then moved the telescope to center the reflection <strong>of</strong> the star image on<br />

the FOP. Going to a third FOP confirmed that there was now a bright star superimposed<br />

on that FOP. The gripper was moved out <strong>of</strong> the field, and the images <strong>of</strong> 5 illuminated FOPs<br />

appeared on the guider TV. The guider was activated, and after a short struggle the telescope<br />

motion seemed to be stable. “Okay,” the operator announced. The astronomers took three<br />

exposures <strong>of</strong> five minutes each. Guiding was stopped, the voltage was turned down on the<br />

TV, the calibration screen reinserted into the beam, and a short projector flat and HeNeAr<br />

exposure were made. Then the blocking filter was changed from the red (OG515) to the blue<br />

(BG39), and new projector flats and HeNeAr exposures were made. The calibration screen<br />

was removed. Examination <strong>of</strong> the FOP guide TV showed that the telescope had drifted only<br />

slightly, and guiding was again initiated. The observers took three ten minute exposures<br />

for blue spectra <strong>of</strong> the same stars. Then the telescope was moved to the zenith, the plate<br />

flattened, and the next field was configured. The process was repeated throughout the night,<br />

interrupted from time to time to observe new radial velocity standards in the red.<br />

Throughout the night the observers made cuts through the spectra, but the first efforts<br />

to reduce the data to “final” spectra failed as there was an ambiguity in how the slit positions<br />

were numbered. The assignment files assigned fiber 103 to a specific star. But, where did<br />

fiber 103 map to on the detector The concentricities file was supposed to provide the<br />

mapping between fiber number and slit position, but the image headers also contained a<br />

mapping. These agreed for the first couple <strong>of</strong> dozen fibers but after that there was an <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

<strong>of</strong> one. After a few dozen more fibers they differed by several. The problem appeared<br />

to be that there were gaps in the output slit. The concentricities file numbered the slit<br />

positions consecutively in providing the mapping, while the header information was derived<br />

apparently assuming there was more or less even spacing. The problem this introduced was<br />

not just being sure which object was which, but which spectra were that <strong>of</strong> sky in order to<br />

sky subtract. Figure 19 shows the problem.<br />

Fortunately () the following night was cloudy, and the astronomers spent the evening<br />

with the telescope pointed at zenith, creating a mapping between fiber number, slit position<br />

in header, and pixel number on the detector. In the case <strong>of</strong> any uncertainty, a fiber could<br />

be moved from the outer region to the central region and exposed to the calibration screen,<br />

and the position on the detector measured unambiguously. The third night was clear, and<br />

by then data could be reduced correctly in real time using the mapping and the IRAF task<br />

dohydra.<br />

How well did the project succeed Radial velocities were obtained for approximately

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!