06.01.2015 Views

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 69 –<br />

red (including at least 7770-8700Å) but also in the blue to obtain some <strong>of</strong> the classical luminosity<br />

indicators used for Galactic yellow supergiants. To observe each fiber configuration<br />

twice, on “blue nights” and “red nights” would require twice as many observing nights, given<br />

the large overhead in each fiber configuration.<br />

The fibers feed a bench spectrograph mounted in a dark room a floor below the telescope.<br />

Changing the grating tilt might require refocusing the spectrograph (a manual operation,<br />

impractical at night) but simply changing blocking filters could be done remotely. If the<br />

filters were <strong>of</strong> similar thickness, and if the camera’s focus was fairly achromatic (which<br />

would be expected <strong>of</strong> a Schmidt camera) then one could configure the fibers, observe in the<br />

red, and simply by changing blocking filters, observe in the blue. No one was quite sure if<br />

this would work, as no one could remember the spectrograph having been used this way, but<br />

it would be easy enough to check on the first afternoon <strong>of</strong> the run. A 790 line/mm grating<br />

blazed at 8500Å in first order was available, and would yield 2.6Å resolution in the red in<br />

first order, and 1.3Å resolution in the blue in second order, providing wavelength coverage<br />

<strong>of</strong> 7300-9050Å in the red and 3650-4525Å in the blue. Obviously the red observations would<br />

require a blocking filter that removed light 7300Å. Among the available filters, an OG515<br />

did an excellent job in the first case, and a BG39 did a good job in the second case while<br />

still transmitting well over the region <strong>of</strong> interest (see Figure 3). (The same argument was<br />

presented above in § 2.2.1.)<br />

Prior to the observing run, thirty fiber configuration fields had been designed in order<br />

to obtain as many <strong>of</strong> the target stars as possible. Since bad weather is always a possibility<br />

(even at Cerro Tololo) the fields were designed in a particular order, with field centers chosen<br />

to include the maximum number <strong>of</strong> stars that had not been previously assigned. Although<br />

the fiber configuration program is flexible in providing various weighting schemes for targets,<br />

it was found necessary to slightly rewrite the code to allow for stars that had been previously<br />

assigned to be added “for free”, i.e., without displacing any not-yet assigned star. (It helped<br />

that the first author had written the original version <strong>of</strong> the code some years back.) The<br />

process took a week or more to refine the code, but the assignments themselves then were<br />

straightforward.<br />

The first afternoon at the telescope, the astronomers arrived to find that everything<br />

appeared to be in good shape. Instrument support personnel had inserted the grating and<br />

blocking filter, checked the grating tilt, and had focused the spectrograph, substantiating the<br />

fact that the focus was unchanged between the red and the blue setups. A comparison arc<br />

had been used to focus the spectrograph, and examination confirmed the expectation that<br />

at the best focus the spectral resolution covered about seven pixels. The observers decided

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!