Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
– 66 –<br />
tometric standard. The star would be relatively near the zenith, and so knowing exactly<br />
when they could get started was not critical, as the allowed tolerance on the rotator angle is<br />
very large for good spectrophotometry. They moved the platform out <strong>of</strong> the way, and slewed<br />
the telescope to the star. When the sky was judged to be sufficiently dark, they carefully<br />
centered it in the slit and begin a 5 minute exposure. Since all <strong>of</strong> the exposures would be<br />
short, they decided not to bother with the considerable overhead <strong>of</strong> setting up the guider, but<br />
would hand guide for all <strong>of</strong> the exposures, using the hand paddle to tweak the star’s position<br />
on the slit if it seemed to be slightly <strong>of</strong>f-center. They observed two more spectrophotometric<br />
standards, each time first moving the telescope to zenith, unstowing the platform, rotating<br />
to the parallactic angle, restowing the platform, and slewing to the next target. There was<br />
no need to measure radial velocities (a difficult undertaking with broad-lined stars) and so<br />
a single HeNeAr comparison would be used to reduce all <strong>of</strong> the data during the night.<br />
After each exposure read down, the data were examined by running IRAF’s splot plotting<br />
routine in a somewhat unconventional manner. The dispersion axis runs along rows, and<br />
normally one would plan to first extract the spectrum before using splot. Instead, the<br />
astronomers used this as a quick method for measuring the integrated counts across the<br />
spatial pr<strong>of</strong>ile subtracting <strong>of</strong>f the bias and sky level, by specifying splot image[1600,*] to<br />
make a cut across the middle <strong>of</strong> the spectrum. The “e” keystroke which is usually used to<br />
determine an equivalent width is then run on the stellar pr<strong>of</strong>ile to determine the number <strong>of</strong><br />
counts integrated under the pr<strong>of</strong>ile, listed as the “flux”. This neatly removes any bias level<br />
from the counts and integrates across the spatial pr<strong>of</strong>ile. This could be checked at several<br />
different columns (500, 1600, 2200) to make sure there are good counts everywhere. After<br />
things settled down for the night, the the observers were in a routine, and used ccdproc to<br />
trim the data and remove the overscan. Flat-fielding would be left until they had thought<br />
more about the fringes. Nevertheless, doslit could be used to extract the spectrum with a<br />
wavelength calibration.<br />
The observers began observing their red supergiant sample. The splot trick proved<br />
essential to make sure they were obtaining adequate counts on the blue side, given the<br />
extreme cool temperatures <strong>of</strong> these stars. Every few hours they would take a break from the<br />
red supergiants to observe spectrophotometric standards, two or three in a row. By the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> the first night they had observed 28 <strong>of</strong> their program objects, and 11 spectrophometric<br />
standards, not bad considering the gymnastics involved in going to the parallactic angle.<br />
Some older telescopes have rotators that are accessible remotely (CTIO and KPNO 4-meters)<br />
while all alt-az telescopes have rotators that can be controlled remotely by necessity.<br />
The analogous observations at CTIO were obtained similarly. Since the detector there<br />
was smaller, three gratings were needed to obtain full wavelength coverage with similar