Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
– 49 –<br />
night. More about this is discussed below in § 3.3.3.<br />
3.2. Further Details<br />
The description <strong>of</strong> the reduction techniques above were intended as a short introduction<br />
to the subject. There are some further issues that involve both observation and reduction<br />
techniques that are worth discussing in some additional depth here; in addition, there are<br />
some <strong>of</strong>ten-neglected topics that may provide the spectroscopist with some useful tools.<br />
3.2.1. Differential Refraction<br />
Differential refraction has two meanings to the spectroscopist, both <strong>of</strong> them important.<br />
First, there is the issue <strong>of</strong> refraction as a function <strong>of</strong> wavelength. Light passing through<br />
the atmosphere is refracted, so that an object will appear to be higher in the sky than it<br />
really is. The amount <strong>of</strong> refraction is a function <strong>of</strong> the wavelength and zenith distance, with<br />
blue light being refracted the most, and the effect being the greatest at low elevation. If<br />
one looks at a star near the horizon with sufficient magnification one will notice that the<br />
atmosphere itself has dispersed the starlight, with the red end <strong>of</strong> the spectrum nearest the<br />
horizon, and the blue part <strong>of</strong> the spectrum further from the horizon. The second meaning<br />
has to do with the fact that the amount <strong>of</strong> refraction (at any wavelength) depends upon the<br />
object’s zenith distance, and hence the amount <strong>of</strong> refraction will differ across the field in the<br />
direction towards or away from the zenith.<br />
This wavelength dependence <strong>of</strong> refraction has important implications for the spectroscopist.<br />
If one is observing a star at low elevation with the slit oriented parallel to the<br />
horizon, the blue part <strong>of</strong> the star’s light will be above the slit, and the red part <strong>of</strong> the star’s<br />
light below the slit if one has centered on the slit visually. Thus much <strong>of</strong> the light is lost.<br />
Were one to instead rotate the slit so it was oriented perpendicular to the horizon then all<br />
<strong>of</strong> the star’s light would enter the slit, albeit it at slightly different spatial locations along<br />
the slit. So, the spectrum would appear to be tilted on the detector, but the light would not<br />
have been selectively removed.<br />
The position angle <strong>of</strong> the slit on the sky is called the parallactic angle, and so it is good<br />
practice to set the slit to this orientation if one wishes to observe very far from the zenith.<br />
How much does it matter Filippenko (1982) computed the amount <strong>of</strong> refraction expected<br />
relative to 5000Å for a variety <strong>of</strong> airmasses making realistic assumptions. Even at a modest<br />
airmass <strong>of</strong> 1.5, the image at 4000Å is displaced upwards (away from the horizon) by 0.71