06.01.2015 Views

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

Astronomical Spectroscopy - Physics - University of Cincinnati

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

– 80 –<br />

similar between the quartz lamp and point sources. The second author has instead<br />

turned to Fourier filtering methods to simply remove fringes outright. S<strong>of</strong>tware exists<br />

within IRAF in the STSDAS package to lock in on the fringe and remove it. This is<br />

easily done with flat fields, and virtually impossible for point source images. Stellar<br />

flats (§ 3.1.2) can be used to create a very crude two-dimensional illumination <strong>of</strong> a<br />

point source. If the fringe pattern is relatively strong, the Fourier filtering packages<br />

should be able to lock in on the overarching pattern and create a fringe correction<br />

which can be applied to all your frames before extraction.<br />

• Wavelength Calibration. For many long slit spectrometers, the wavelength solution<br />

is a function <strong>of</strong> position on the slit. It was already suggested that wavelength calibration<br />

should be applied using comparison lamp solutions which were extracted at the exact<br />

same location as the star was extracted. If this is not done, then there will be slight<br />

variations in solution with slit position and the resolution will be inadvertently reduced<br />

by co-adding such data. Moreover, this can lead to even more serious problems later<br />

on when applying telluric corrections.<br />

• Telluric Correction. The telluric standards need to have been observed at a very<br />

similar airmass and hopefully fairly close in time to the program object. When observing,<br />

one needs to be sure that the telluric standard observations extend to the same<br />

range <strong>of</strong> airmasses as the program objects (both minimum and maximum). If the<br />

match isn’t great, one can interpolate as needed by using hybrid spectra <strong>of</strong> two telluric<br />

stars to get a better airmass correction. Also, IRAF has very useful s<strong>of</strong>tware which<br />

actually uses the telluric lines with a statistical minimization routine, to make the best<br />

match. Finally, if one is working in an area <strong>of</strong> very strong telluric lines, there may be a<br />

good match with the features only when the target and standard were observed in the<br />

exact same location in the slit. This requires keeping all spectra separate until telluric<br />

removal, then combining the final set <strong>of</strong> spectra as the last step.<br />

Possibly the strongest recommendation is that one needs to talk to a previous user <strong>of</strong><br />

the instrument, preferably one who actually knows what they are doing. Make sure that the<br />

answers make sense, though. (Better still would be to talk to several such previous users,<br />

and average their responses, possibly using some strong rejection algorithm.) Maybe they<br />

will even be willing to share some <strong>of</strong> their data before the observing run, so that one can<br />

really get a sense <strong>of</strong> what things will look like.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!