06.01.2015 Views

The Potential of Whale Watching in the Caribbean: 1999+

The Potential of Whale Watching in the Caribbean: 1999+

The Potential of Whale Watching in the Caribbean: 1999+

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUTHOR'S NOTE<br />

'<strong>Whale</strong> watch<strong>in</strong>g', <strong>in</strong> this report, refers to tours by sea or land, formal or <strong>in</strong>formal,<br />

with some commercial aspect, to see any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> some 81 species <strong>of</strong> whales, dolph<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

porpoises collectively known as cetaceans. As well as tours that are strictly whale or<br />

dolph<strong>in</strong> oriented, we also <strong>in</strong>clude general mar<strong>in</strong>e nature tours and cruises which feature<br />

or <strong>in</strong>clude whales and dolph<strong>in</strong>s as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trip. This def<strong>in</strong>ition is essentially <strong>the</strong> same as<br />

that widely used <strong>in</strong> various workshops and reports (e.g., Hoyt 1995, Hoyt 1996b; IFAW,<br />

Tethys & Europe Conservation 1995; IFAW 1999).<br />

For <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> this report, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong> refers exclusively to <strong>the</strong> island<br />

nations and territories <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider or Greater <strong>Caribbean</strong>, from <strong>the</strong> Bahamas <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> North<br />

to Tr<strong>in</strong>idad and Tobago <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> south.<br />

Many people have provided detailed <strong>in</strong>formation, spoken and written, on <strong>the</strong><br />

various countries and island territories. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation, <strong>in</strong>evitably, is conflict<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

I have tried to be fair and balanced and to sort out <strong>in</strong>consistencies. In any case, <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

assessments are my own, and I am responsible for <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

A word about species identifications: <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong>, dolph<strong>in</strong>s are typically<br />

referred to as 'porpoise' while 'dolph<strong>in</strong>' can refer to <strong>the</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong> fish. In fact, <strong>the</strong>re are no<br />

true porpoises found <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Caribbean</strong>. Also, <strong>the</strong>re are many local names for o<strong>the</strong>r small<br />

cetaceans which vary from island to island, some <strong>of</strong> which lump various species toge<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>of</strong> which dist<strong>in</strong>guish by species. <strong>The</strong>re is no doubt that <strong>the</strong> confusion <strong>in</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ology<br />

and identification results <strong>in</strong> many lost sight<strong>in</strong>gs or misidentifications, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

difficulties <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> dolph<strong>in</strong> hunt<strong>in</strong>g particularly <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern<br />

<strong>Caribbean</strong>. In this report, if <strong>the</strong> species identification was reasonably certa<strong>in</strong> I have used it;<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise I have simply used 'tropical dolph<strong>in</strong>' or 'blackfish' <strong>in</strong> an attempt to be as specific<br />

as warranted by <strong>the</strong> evidence. Common names are those followed by Lea<strong>the</strong>rwood and<br />

Reeves <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sierra Club Handbook <strong>of</strong> <strong>Whale</strong>s and Dolph<strong>in</strong>s and Jefferson et al <strong>in</strong> Mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Mammals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> World.<br />

I have followed <strong>the</strong> same procedures as <strong>in</strong> earlier reports to determ<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> direct,<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct, and total revenues, and <strong>the</strong> exchange rates used. Exchange rates, if necessary, are<br />

made from local curencies to <strong>the</strong> US dollar at rates prevail<strong>in</strong>g on April 15, 1999.<br />

Conversion to £ sterl<strong>in</strong>g (UK) is made at $1.62 = £1.00. Direct revenues are <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

tours (ticket price); <strong>in</strong>direct revenues <strong>in</strong>clude food, accommodation, travel, film, souvenirs<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r expenses <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> whale watch<strong>in</strong>g. Total revenues are direct +<br />

<strong>in</strong>direct revenues. In general, <strong>the</strong> total revenues from whale watch<strong>in</strong>g near urban centres<br />

are approximately 3.5x <strong>the</strong> direct revenues. In remote centres which entail considerable<br />

travel, total revenues are usually at least 7.67x <strong>the</strong> direct revenues. Estimated total<br />

revenues for dedicated whale watch<strong>in</strong>g, based on <strong>the</strong>se multiples, are given for areas<br />

where detailed figures are unavailable (see Hoyt 1995, p. 5 for fur<strong>the</strong>r explanation and<br />

references). However, no multiples are used for <strong>in</strong>cidental or spontaneous whale<br />

watch<strong>in</strong>g, where <strong>the</strong> decision to go whale watch<strong>in</strong>g is made at <strong>the</strong> departure site<br />

(equivalent to impulse buy<strong>in</strong>g), thus <strong>in</strong>curr<strong>in</strong>g no additional revenues beyond <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

ticket price, plus purchases on board and immediately after <strong>the</strong> trip.<br />

This report is aimed at a wide audience <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g tourism departments, mar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

operators <strong>of</strong> every description (dive, yacht, etc.), fisheries and environment m<strong>in</strong>istries,<br />

local and <strong>in</strong>ternational NGOs (non-governmental organisations) concerned with whale<br />

watch<strong>in</strong>g and ecotourism. Because <strong>of</strong> this wide audience, a decision was made not to<br />

reference every po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text as <strong>in</strong> a scientific paper. However, each country section is<br />

followed by a list <strong>of</strong> acknowledgments; many are personal communications except those<br />

noted with dates which are publications listed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> back under references. In addition to<br />

<strong>the</strong> acknowledgments listed under <strong>in</strong>dividual countries, I would like to thank Sue Fisher,<br />

Kate O'Connell, and Cathy Williamson for read<strong>in</strong>g and comment<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> entire text.<br />

— Erich Hoyt<br />

6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!