Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3 All] Dr. R.C. Agrawal and another V. Bhar<strong>at</strong> Press and others 1089<br />
finally surrendered his registr<strong>at</strong>ion<br />
certific<strong>at</strong>e to the Bar Council <strong>of</strong> U.P. on<br />
25.5.1995. He started printing business<br />
in partnership <strong>of</strong> one Sanjeev Misra in<br />
the name and style <strong>of</strong> M/s Printrite<br />
which was run from the house <strong>of</strong> Mr.<br />
Sanjeev Misra, 523/450, Badshahi<br />
Mandi, <strong>Allahabad</strong>. The partnership was<br />
dissolved in the year 2001 and the<br />
petitioner no. 2 having no other option<br />
was compelled to take away the printing<br />
machines, computer, furniture etc.<br />
which are now kept on the second floor<br />
<strong>of</strong> the disputed shop. Since then the<br />
petitioner no. 2 is idle without any work<br />
and unemployed, therefore, he required<br />
the shops in dispute for his personal use<br />
to set up his printing business. The need<br />
<strong>of</strong> the petitioner no. 1 was also set up<br />
for the ground floor accommod<strong>at</strong>ion i.e.<br />
the disputed shop as petitioner no. 1 had<br />
suffered massive heart <strong>at</strong>tack on<br />
15.9.2002 and was admitted in Nazareth<br />
Hospital, <strong>Allahabad</strong>. He was referred to<br />
Escort Hospital, New Delhi and is also a<br />
p<strong>at</strong>ient <strong>of</strong> diabetes and high blood<br />
pressure and doctor has strictly advised<br />
him not to use stairs but having no other<br />
option but to ascend and descend the<br />
staircase on the second floor number <strong>of</strong><br />
times during the day. The petitioner no.<br />
1 also required job as he wanted to open<br />
a small clinic on the ground floor after<br />
shifting so th<strong>at</strong> he may be engaged and<br />
also put his skill to good use. Thus the<br />
bonafide need set up in the release<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ion was on the aforesaid two<br />
grounds. On perusal <strong>of</strong> the release<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ion, it transpires th<strong>at</strong> it was<br />
urgently required for both the<br />
petitioners. Request to the respondents<br />
to vac<strong>at</strong>e the ground floor failed to yield<br />
any result.<br />
6. The respondents-tenant filed<br />
their objection denying their bonafide<br />
need <strong>of</strong> the petitioners pleading<br />
compar<strong>at</strong>ive hardship in their favour.<br />
Specific objection was th<strong>at</strong> the<br />
petitioner no. 1 and his wife did not<br />
reside in <strong>Allahabad</strong> and they are<br />
permanently residing <strong>at</strong> Sultanpur and<br />
they have two big houses <strong>at</strong> Sultanpur.<br />
He is rerunning his medical clinic <strong>at</strong><br />
Sultanpur and claim by the petitioner<br />
th<strong>at</strong> he had a massive heart p<strong>at</strong>ient and<br />
diabetes is concocted and not worth<br />
reliance. The ground for release <strong>of</strong> the<br />
disputed shop was also denied. Sales tax<br />
registr<strong>at</strong>ion, partnership deed and<br />
dissolution deed were also denied. The<br />
petitioner had also filed affidavit <strong>of</strong><br />
Sanjeev Misra, erstwhile partner <strong>of</strong> the<br />
petitioner no. 2 which is numbered as<br />
Paper No. 48B supporting the<br />
contention <strong>of</strong> the petitioner no. 2<br />
regarding partnership business <strong>of</strong><br />
printing press for the period from 1995<br />
to 2001. Subsequently when Sanjeev<br />
Misra was got employed after de<strong>at</strong>h <strong>of</strong><br />
his f<strong>at</strong>her in <strong>Allahabad</strong> University on<br />
compassion<strong>at</strong>e ground, the partnership<br />
firm was dissolved. Neeraj Dhall, son <strong>of</strong><br />
respondent no. 3 had given his affidavit<br />
on 1.7.2008 expressing willingness to<br />
vac<strong>at</strong>e the back portion hall <strong>of</strong> the first<br />
floor <strong>of</strong> the disputed house. The<br />
petitioners had also <strong>of</strong>fered an<br />
altern<strong>at</strong>ive accommod<strong>at</strong>ion to<br />
respondent nos. 2 and 3 to shift their<br />
business to the first floor from the<br />
ground floor <strong>of</strong> the same building but<br />
they refused to agree and instead<br />
preferred to contest the release<br />
applic<strong>at</strong>ion.<br />
7. The trial court dismissed the<br />
release applic<strong>at</strong>ion vide its judgment<br />
d<strong>at</strong>ed 11.8.2008. The petitioners