Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Nov - High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1092 INDIAN LAW REPORTS ALLAHABAD SERIES [2009<br />
to Neeraj Dhall. This has specifically<br />
been replied by the landlord on affidavit<br />
th<strong>at</strong> he had agreed to vac<strong>at</strong>e the ground<br />
floor portion and, therefore, the first<br />
floor was <strong>of</strong>fered to him as an<br />
altern<strong>at</strong>ive accommod<strong>at</strong>ion but<br />
subsequently he declined from his own<br />
assurance. It is also st<strong>at</strong>ed on affidavit<br />
th<strong>at</strong> the petitioner no. 2 is doing job<br />
work by getting orders from different<br />
Universities and is getting printing work<br />
from the market which is hardly<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>itable and he gets only nominal<br />
commission. Thus he is suffering in day<br />
to day business.<br />
13. In fact after going through the<br />
judgment, I realize th<strong>at</strong> the courts have<br />
taken small and extraneous m<strong>at</strong>ter into<br />
consider<strong>at</strong>ion and not considered<br />
broadly the principles laid down for<br />
coming to definite conclusion whether<br />
the accommod<strong>at</strong>ion is required<br />
bonafidely or not and also regarding the<br />
compar<strong>at</strong>ive hardship. I have also<br />
noticed th<strong>at</strong> the appell<strong>at</strong>e court though<br />
has halfheartedly come to a conclusion<br />
th<strong>at</strong> the landlords are suffering hardship<br />
but since the finding on the bonafide<br />
need was recorded against the landlord,<br />
the appeal has also been dismissed. The<br />
courts have strenuously tried to neg<strong>at</strong>e<br />
the case <strong>of</strong> the landlord ignoring<br />
specific assertions on affidavit. The<br />
court has also disbelieved the assertion<br />
th<strong>at</strong> partnership stands dissolved for<br />
want <strong>of</strong> the partnership deed on one<br />
hand while they have refused to accept<br />
the document in evidence.<br />
14. The Apex <strong>Court</strong> in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Sarla Ahuja Vs. United India<br />
Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 1999 Supreme<br />
<strong>Court</strong>, 100 has held th<strong>at</strong> to deprive a<br />
landlord <strong>of</strong> the benefit <strong>of</strong> release on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> altern<strong>at</strong>ive<br />
residential accommod<strong>at</strong>ion in another<br />
city is not a ground to disentitle the<br />
landlord from recovery <strong>of</strong> possession <strong>of</strong><br />
tenanted accommod<strong>at</strong>ion. The Apex<br />
<strong>Court</strong> has c<strong>at</strong>egorically come to a<br />
conclusion th<strong>at</strong> it is unnecessary to<br />
make endeavour as to how the landlords<br />
have adjusted in another<br />
accommod<strong>at</strong>ion. This is wh<strong>at</strong> exactly<br />
the courts below have done in the<br />
instant case. They have tried to<br />
somehow advise the landlord and also<br />
grant heavy consider<strong>at</strong>ion to the tenant<br />
only because they have set up a<br />
goodwill since last 40-50 years or<br />
because they do not have any other<br />
place to go. The courts below were<br />
liable to take into consider<strong>at</strong>ion th<strong>at</strong> it is<br />
the landlord himself who is the best<br />
judge <strong>of</strong> his requirement. The courts<br />
cannot dict<strong>at</strong>e how and where he should<br />
live. Same view was expressed in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> Nanak Chand (since deceased)<br />
and others Vs. Jai Bhagwan, 2009 (1)<br />
ARC, 829. In the said case the landlord<br />
had sought release on the ground th<strong>at</strong> he<br />
is retired and wants to live in his<br />
hometown and also to do the research<br />
work and write articles and papers on<br />
the subject <strong>of</strong> science and also teach<br />
some students free <strong>of</strong> charge. This court<br />
was <strong>of</strong> the view th<strong>at</strong> it is a very valid<br />
ground and held th<strong>at</strong> the landlord was<br />
entitled for his accommod<strong>at</strong>ion. Similar<br />
view was expressed in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
Shamshad Ahmad and others Vs. Tilak<br />
Raj Bajaj (d) by L. Rs. and others,<br />
2008 (3) ARC 532. Extract <strong>of</strong> relevant<br />
paragraph is quoted below:-<br />
"The Counsel is also right in<br />
submitting th<strong>at</strong> admittedly, M<strong>at</strong>loob<br />
Ahmad had retired from service. Even if<br />
the tenant was right in submitting th<strong>at</strong>