Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Joel A Lewis Youth Against Fascism.pdf
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
THE POPULAR FRONT GENERATION<br />
Comintern placed great hope in youth to break with past practices and to embrace a more<br />
flexible populism centred on anti-fascism.<br />
Nevertheless, the international "left opposition" communist groups denounced the<br />
Popular Front as opportunistic heresy, highlighting the divergence of Dimitrov's positions<br />
with traditional Leninism. While some historians contend that the "milder tone" of<br />
Popular Front rhetoric "in nowise involved a deviation from orthodox communist goals,"<br />
left critics of the Popular Front did not share this opinion. 24 Leon Trotsky was the most<br />
ardent contemporary critic of the Popular Front. 25 Trotsky linked the Popular Front with<br />
"Stalinism" which he described as the "syphilis of the workers' movement." 26 Trotsky<br />
asserted the Popular Front promoted "class collaboration" and was the culmination of<br />
Stalinism being imposed upon the Comintern. Trotsky condemned the early French<br />
populist initiatives of 1935, declaring that "the Third International is dead" and that now<br />
was the time to "theoretically and practically, prepare for the Fourth International." 27 The<br />
Comintern had "outlived" its purpose, Trotsky declaring that his Fourth International was<br />
to be "the world party of Socialist Revolution." 28 This critique of the Popular Front<br />
formed the theoretical basis of the Trotskyist movement which asserted that they represent<br />
a "true Bolshevik" movement. 29 The former CPUSA chairman Jay Lovestone<br />
presented a similar critique. Lovestone vehemently argued that pursuing a line centred<br />
on securing "universal peace" against the threat of fascism was "a monstrous violation of<br />
Marxist and Leninist teachings." 30 Lovestone and Trotsky both hoped disillusionment<br />
with the Popular Front line would add to the strength of their own oppositional communist<br />
groupings.<br />
Transitions within Soviet foreign and domestic policy had profound implications for<br />
international communism. In 1934 Stalin set out to transform the role of the Soviet<br />
Union in international relations from an oppositional position into a constructive force to<br />
counter threats of fascist aggression. 31 Stalin dismissed Bolshevik tradition and joined<br />
the League of Nations, seeking out "protective alliances" with capitalist nations for a<br />
policy of "collective security" against fascism. 32 The overwhelming size of the Red<br />
Army made the Soviets more attractive to potential allies in the West, but Soviet history<br />
and mutual distrust limited Stalin's diplomatic success. Despite this factor, the Soviet<br />
Foreign Commissar Maxim Litvinov continued to make "a real effort to come to terms<br />
with the Western powers for united resistance to Fascist aggression and to use the League<br />
of Nations as an instrument for this purpose." 33 The Soviet Union used their assistance to<br />
Spain to exemplify their "new outlook," insisting that the Spanish Republic and USSR<br />
were defending democracy, not promoting Bolshevik revolution. Communists increasingly<br />
asserted that the struggle in Spain was not about "communism versus fascism," but<br />
embodied an international struggle where social forces were "either on the side of bestial<br />
fascism, or on the side of democracy." 34<br />
Internal Soviet trends facilitated vital propaganda points for the construction of the<br />
Popular Front on the issue of democracy. The adoption of the "Stalin Constitution" in<br />
41