14.01.2015 Views

Annual Report 2006-2007 - Cafcass

Annual Report 2006-2007 - Cafcass

Annual Report 2006-2007 - Cafcass

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KPI 5 –The percentage of Section<br />

8s referred for dispute resolution,<br />

which are then referred for a Section<br />

7 report.<br />

Norm = 35% to 45%<br />

20.6%<br />

Achieved<br />

All regions easily met the norm in this<br />

sample of dispute resolution work,<br />

with all regions reporting below 35%.<br />

The achievement of this KPI is based on a sample of February and March <strong>2007</strong> data.<br />

KPI 6 –100% diversity monitoring<br />

forms returned for all service users.<br />

61.2%<br />

Not achieved but improved<br />

While the target of 100% was not<br />

achieved this year, all regions have<br />

shown steady improvement from a<br />

baseline of 47% since the introduction<br />

of this new KPI. Five regions achieved<br />

higher than the national average<br />

(East Midlands, Eastern, North<br />

East, Southern and Yorkshire &<br />

Humberside).<br />

This KPI is aimed at understanding who our service users are and to use that information to better plan our service so<br />

it is relevant and better meets their needs.<br />

KPI 7 –100% appraisals completed<br />

for all staff within a 12-month period.<br />

60.3%<br />

Not achieved but improved<br />

While the target of 100% was not<br />

achieved this year, all regions have<br />

shown steady improvement since<br />

the introduction of this new KPI.<br />

Three regions and National Office all<br />

completed higher than the national<br />

average (North East, Yorkshire<br />

& Humberside and North West,<br />

including Legal Services within<br />

National Office (100%)).<br />

Our staff survey sample reported 75% of staff had received an appraisal, indicating that we are not collecting<br />

information accurately. We will be monitoring this closely next year.<br />

KPI 8 – Sickness absence rate of no<br />

more than 4%.<br />

4.3%<br />

Partially achieved<br />

The comparative figure in 2005–06<br />

was 3.5%. Five regions and National<br />

Office met the target of lower than<br />

4% for sickness absence (East<br />

Midlands, Eastern, North West,<br />

South West and Southern), and two<br />

regions were on target with lower<br />

than 4.7% sickness absence (South<br />

East and West Midlands).<br />

This KPI is a measure of our corporate health. We have made considerable improvement in reducing sickness absence<br />

through a combination of proactive health and safety initiatives. Our achievement compares favourably with the<br />

Chartered Institute of Personnel Development <strong>Annual</strong> Absence Survey <strong>2006</strong>, which reported 4.8% sickness absence for<br />

local government and 4.6% for central government.<br />

Section 1: Management Commentary | 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!