October 2009 - South Tahoe Public Utility District

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Agreement Name Davis-Grunsky Act Contract Cooperative Agreement for Indian Creek Reservoir Recreational Facilities Alpine Decree Surface Water Rights to Support Indian Creek Reservoir Indian Creek Reservoir TMDL Gansberg Agreement (Harvey pasture cattle grazing agreement) Dressler Agreement i. Abdoo Modification ii. Brooke Modification Agreement Parties District and California Department of Water Resources United States Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and District District and Nevada District Court LRWQCB and District and other parties District and Gansberg District and Dressler Co. (and subsequently Abdoo, Aqueduct and Brooke) Agreement Effective Dates 3 May 1972 to 1 Oct 2022 13 Jun 1973 to 11 Nov 2024 Most recent Order approved 16 Nov 1990 2003-Current 1986 to 1 Nov 2028 19 Jan 1984 to 1 Nov 2028 Agreement Summary Description State provided funds for constructing Indian Creek Reservoir with the agreement the District would construct, maintain and operate recreational facilities on the reservoir. The BLM agreed to meet the District's obligations of the Davis-Grunsky Act Contract. The District agrees to maintain the Indian Creek Reservoir trout fishery. Transfer surface water rights into storage in Indian Creek Reservoir to support the minimum pool elevation and enhance the cold water fishery. Established Total Maximum Daily Loads for pollutants of concern (such as Phosphorus) to improve water quality in Indian Creek Reservoir and Indian Creek. Gansberg agrees to graze his cattle on a portion of Harvey Place lands. The District constructed a 75' pipeline from its export pipeline to the Harvey Place irrigation ditch; Gansberg agrees to maintain the ditch and use it to irrigate the land agreed upon for grazing. Guarantees delivery of water from Harvey Place Reservoir to the lands of Dressler and delivery of flushing flows for Indian Creek Reservoir. The District constructed Upper Dressler Ditch to divert Indian Creek water to Indian Creek Reservoir to maintain its water quality. The District constructed an On-Farm irrigation system on Dressler land and committed a min. 800 AF/Yr, and max. 2,000 AF/Yr. This depends on transmitting recycled water through the lands of Hall, Celio, and perhaps Bruns. Dressler grants the District access for monitoring and construction, for monitoring wells and other infrastructure, and grants emergency discharge from Harvey Place Reservoir onto his lands. If the District terminates the agreement before its term is up, it must give Dressler access to all structures that affect his water rights. Dressler has the right to be released from the agreement for a portion of the lands if the remaining lands are sufficient for the committed application. District Considerations or Issues Contract calls for a minimum pool elevation of 5583 feet and maintenance of the trout fishery. District should implement the Hypolimnetic Oxygenation System. November 1990 Order allows District to provide up to 555 AF/Yr for recreational use at Indian Creek Reservoir or water to be used for irrigation of appurtenant lands (such as the Schwake Ranch). Interim and long-term targets must be met by 2013 and 2024, respectively, as outlined in Table 1.1 (page 1-4). Gansberg Agreement is tied to the Diamond Ditch Agreement, so both will need to be renegotiated with the Diamond Ditch Agreement term is up. Scott Brooke acquired a portion of Dressler lands and constructed a connection from the District's lateral to his Far East Ditch to irrigate lands with recycled water rights (800-2,000 AF/Yr) he acquired as Dressler's successor. The recycled water contract will need to be renegotiated with Brooke in 2028. Fresh water flushing flows for Indian Creek Reservoir will need to be renegotiated with the owners of Mud Lake. South Tahoe Public Utility District Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan - October 2009 Page 1-8
Agreement Name Celio Agreement Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Bruns Ranch Irrigation Site Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Gansberg Ranch Irrigation Site Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Neddenriep Ranch Irrigation Site Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Ace Hereford Ranch Irrigation Site Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Celio Ranch Irrigation Site Tentative Wastewater Reclamation Requirements for Dressler On-Farm Irrigation System Agreement Parties District and Celio Bruns and LRWQCB Gansberg and LRWQCB Neddenriep Partnership and LRWQCB Bush (trustee for Hall) and LRWQCB Celio and LRWQCB Dressler and LRWQCB Agreement Effective Dates 30 Aug 1983 to 2028 13 April 1989 to 2028* 13 April 1989 to 2028* 13 April 1989 to 2028* 13 April 1989 to 2028* 13 April 1989 to 2028* 13 April 1989 to 2028* Agreement Summary Description The District agrees to provide a minimum 100 AF/Yr and max. 200 AF/Yr to Celio, in addition to any tailwater the ranch receives from Ace Hereford. Celio grants the District an easement for recycled water operations through the lands. Permits the ranch an annual average of 650 AF recycled water on 170 acres. Bruns actually receives ¼ of the recycled water remaining after the Celio and Dressler obligations are met. This is a function of how much recycled water the District’s plant produces and could be less than 650 AF. Permits the ranch an annual average of 650 AF recycled water on 505 acres. Gansberg actually receives ¼ of the recycled water remaining after the Celio and Dressler obligations are met. This is a function of how much recycled water the District’s plant produces and could be less than 650 AF. Permits the ranch an annual average of 650 AF recycled water on 458 acres. Neddenriep actually receives ¼ of the recycled water remaining after the Celio and Dressler obligations are met. This is a function of how much recycled water the District’s plant produces and could be less than 650 AF. Permits the ranch an annual average of 650 AF recycled water on 250 acres. Hall actually receives ¼ of the recycled water remaining after the Celio and Dressler obligations are met. This is a function of how much recycled water the District’s plant produces and could be less than 650 AF. Permits the ranch an annual average of 200 AF recycled water on 100 acres. Permits the ranch an annual average of 2,000 AF recycled water on 400 acres (800 AF plus a potential 1,200 AF for the On-Farm emergency disposal land). District Considerations or Issues District should negotiate an extension of the easement for the Celio Agreement. Freshwater supplied from West Fork of Carson River (Fredericksburg diversion). Tailwater extends to Gansberg and Neddenriep ranches. Freshwater supplied from West Fork of Carson River. Tailwater extends to Neddenriep ranch Freshwater supplied from West Fork of Carson River. Tailwater extends to Gansberg Ranch and Nevada. Tailwater extends to Celio and Brooke ranches. Tailwater extends to Brooke ranch. Celio is actually irrigating 47 acres. Tailwater extends to On-Farm system. Current permitting exceeds the planning value 3.25 AF/Acre recycled water application rate. *This agreement can be modified/terminated by either party, given a 5-year notice. South Tahoe Public Utility District Recycled Water Facilities Master Plan - October 2009 Page 1-9
Page 1 and 2: South Tahoe Public Utility District
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents List of Tables ..
Page 5 and 6: 6.4.3 Endangered Species Act ......
Page 7 and 8: Section 13: 12.4 Potential Temporar
Page 9 and 10: 11.2 - Indian Creek Freshwater Trea
Page 11 and 12: Executive Summary Introduction, Pur
Page 13 and 14: Through a process of public partici
Page 15 and 16: Table ES-2 presents vital numbers r
Page 17 and 18: Section 7 - Master Plan Development
Page 19 and 20: Section 1: Introduction The purpose
Page 21 and 22: agreement between South Lake Tahoe
Page 23 and 24: irrigation ditches were used to irr
Page 25: Agreement Name 1967 Agreement Harve
Page 29 and 30: Section 2: Study Area 2.1 Descripti
Page 31 and 32: ecycled water facilities and public
Page 33 and 34: Section 3: Existing Freshwater Syst
Page 35 and 36: Figure 3.2: Indian Creek Reservoir
Page 37 and 38: Section 4: Existing Recycled Water
Page 39 and 40: Farm lateral must be intact to util
Page 41 and 42: 4.2.1.3 Neddenriep Ranch Partnershi
Page 43 and 44: Development in areas currently rece
Page 45 and 46: Flow (MGD) Section 5: Flow Projecti
Page 47 and 48: Table 5.0: Recycled Water Flow and
Page 49 and 50: Volume of Recycled Water (AFY) Tabl
Page 51 and 52: estimated 2028 population of 33,900
Page 53 and 54: Figure 5.2.1(b): NO 3-N versus Time
Page 55 and 56: Figure 5.2.1(f): Total Dissolved So
Page 57 and 58: 5.2.4 Groundwater Monitoring The Di
Page 59 and 60: Section 6: Recycled Water Quality R
Page 61 and 62: Services (DHS) to establish water r
Page 63 and 64: „Secondary treatment‟ means the
Page 65 and 66: 6.4.4 Section 401 of the Clean Wate
Page 67 and 68: Section 7: Master Plan Development
Page 69 and 70: ● ● ● ● ● To maximize rec
Page 71 and 72: annually. This inconsistency can be
Page 73 and 74: Each workshop conducted in 2001 was
Page 75 and 76: Section 8: Development of Projects
Page 77 and 78:
Table 8.1 Recycled Water Facilities
Page 79 and 80:
Section 9: Recycled Water Infrastru
Page 81 and 82:
Several options exist for efficient
Page 83 and 84:
Reservoir outlet facility to Diamon
Page 85 and 86:
9.4.1 Project Description The desig
Page 87 and 88:
9.5.1 Project Description Improveme
Page 89 and 90:
monitoring and SCADA control system
Page 91 and 92:
Pressure required to allow full fun
Page 93 and 94:
elatively minor in comparison to op
Page 95 and 96:
Section 10: Recycled Water Manageme
Page 97 and 98:
with recycled water. This and other
Page 99 and 100:
Section 11: Fresh Water Infrastruct
Page 101 and 102:
Like Project No. 14 (page 11-81), p
Page 103 and 104:
available storage volume of the Res
Page 105 and 106:
Section 12: Fresh Water Management
Page 107 and 108:
Section 13: Master Plan Implementat
Page 109 and 110:
13.2 Recycled Water Production Trig
Page 111 and 112:
Ranch Total Acreage Table 13.1 - Ac
Page 113 and 114:
13.3 Regulation Triggered Project I
Page 115 and 116:
District to realize an economic ben
Page 117 and 118:
pipeline from the beginning of the
Page 119 and 120:
13.8 Capital Improvement Plan The M
Page 121 and 122:
2) Construct Project No.‟s 1, 2,
Page 123 and 124:
13.9.3 Groundwater Monitoring Recom
Page 125 and 126:
It is recommended that District imp
show all

October 2009 - South Tahoe Public Utility District

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?