15.01.2015 Views

1000 Hydraulics Chapter - Ministry of Transportation

1000 Hydraulics Chapter - Ministry of Transportation

1000 Hydraulics Chapter - Ministry of Transportation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BC MoT<br />

SUPPLEMENT TO TAC GEOMETRIC DESIGN GUIDE<br />

MoT Section 1030 TAC Section 2.1.2<br />

1030<br />

OPEN CHANNEL DESIGN<br />

1030.01 DESIGN RETURN PERIODS<br />

For open channel design return periods, refer to<br />

Section 1010.02.<br />

1030.02 OPEN CHANNEL<br />

CHARACTERISTICS<br />

Highway ditch designs typically accommodate right-<strong>of</strong>way<br />

drainage, which may include run<strong>of</strong>f from pavement<br />

areas, cut slopes and adjacent overland flow. Conversely,<br />

drainage channels are specifically designed for larger<br />

drainage basins and watercourses. Drainage channel<br />

design may incorporate the following considerations:<br />

hydraulic requirements, river engineering concepts,<br />

fisheries enhancement works, etc.<br />

For typical earth ditch sections, ditch sections in solid<br />

rock cuts and median sections, refer to:<br />

♦ BC Supplement to TAC Geometric Design Guide,<br />

Fig. 440.A, B, C, D & G.<br />

For geometric properties <strong>of</strong> various open channels, refer<br />

to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1 (1982), p. 3.4.<br />

Grades<br />

Roadside drainage ditch grades do not necessarily need to<br />

be the same as the road pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The desirable minimum<br />

sustained grade for channels is -0.5%, with -0.3% allowed<br />

as an absolute minimum to ensure drainage and prevent<br />

“standing water”. Steep channel grades should be<br />

checked for erodibility.<br />

For information on ditch grades, refer to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1 (1982), p. 3.31.<br />

Channel Depth<br />

The roadside drainage ditch depth should be designed<br />

such that the ditch invert is a minimum 0.30 m below the<br />

bottom <strong>of</strong> the SGSB layer. The ditch should also be<br />

designed such that the flow does not frequently make<br />

contact with the SGSB layer. The maximum allowable<br />

depth <strong>of</strong> flow in minor ditches is 0.6 m.<br />

The recommended minimum freeboard is 0.3 m for small<br />

drainage channels, larger channels should have a greater<br />

freeboard allowance.<br />

For information on ditch depth, refer to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1 (1982), p. 3.31.<br />

Channel Width<br />

The bottom width <strong>of</strong> highway ditches varies and is<br />

dependent upon ditch shape, depth, slope, type <strong>of</strong> material<br />

and maintenance requirements. The bottom width <strong>of</strong> a<br />

roadside ditch should not normally be less than 1 m.<br />

However, for major roadways, this may be increased for<br />

safety purposes to approximately 2 m.<br />

For information on channel width, refer to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1(1982), p. 3.31.<br />

Sideslopes<br />

Typical channel sideslopes range between 1.5:1 (H:V) to<br />

4:1. Ditch sideslopes steeper than 2:1 are generally<br />

difficult to maintain.<br />

For information on sideslopes, refer to:<br />

♦ BC Supplement to TAC Geometric Design Guide,<br />

Fig. 440.A, B, C, D & G.<br />

Roughness Coefficients<br />

Manning’s roughness coefficients (n) are commonly used<br />

to describe channel and conduit characteristics.<br />

For Manning’s roughness coefficients, refer to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1 (1982), Table<br />

3.2.3, p. 3.12.<br />

For information on Manning’s roughness coefficients,<br />

refer to:<br />

♦ RTAC Drainage Manual Volume 1 (1982), p. 3.10.<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> Existing Channel<br />

An existing channel should be analyzed to determine if<br />

there is sufficient capacity to accommodate the design<br />

flow. If channel capacity is insufficient, drainage<br />

problems may occur at unexpected locations during large<br />

flood events. In addition, channel stability and debris<br />

loads should also be assessed.<br />

June, 2007 Page 1030-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!