Annual Report 2004-2005 - Forensicare
Annual Report 2004-2005 - Forensicare
Annual Report 2004-2005 - Forensicare
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The recommendations included in the audit<br />
reports are currently being implemented.<br />
Personal Identification<br />
Different coloured lanyards for staff and<br />
visitors were introduced during the year to<br />
enhance security within the Hospital. This<br />
provides for the quick identification of<br />
visitors in times of emergency and enables<br />
patients (who don’t wear lanyards) to be<br />
immediately identified.<br />
Contractors<br />
A security training program and a<br />
Contractors’ Handbook (which details all<br />
security requirements) was developed in<br />
<strong>2004</strong> for all external contractors working in<br />
the hospital. All contractors, many of whom<br />
require the use of tools and other<br />
equipment within the hospital, are now<br />
required to attend the training program<br />
and indicate that they have read and<br />
understood the handbook prior to<br />
commencing work.<br />
Security Drills and Training<br />
All clinical staff are required to participate<br />
in security drills, which are held monthly,<br />
generally without notice. Our security<br />
provider, GSL Custodial Services, is<br />
required to respond to each drill within<br />
their contracted benchmarks. Feedback<br />
on each drill is circulated to staff and an<br />
outcome report submitted to Council.<br />
During <strong>2004</strong>-<strong>2005</strong>, security issues<br />
involving the entire hospital were covered<br />
in the drills.<br />
LEGAL SERVICES<br />
<strong>Forensicare</strong> operates under a complex<br />
legislative environment that governs its<br />
relationships with government and the<br />
services it supplies to patients and clients.<br />
The Mental Health Act 1986 and the<br />
Crimes (Mental Impairment and Unfitness<br />
to be Tried) Act 1997 set out the legal<br />
framework for treatment for patients<br />
and clients.<br />
CUSTODIAL SUPERVISION<br />
ORDERS<br />
As noted elsewhere (see Chief Executive<br />
Officer’s <strong>Report</strong>, page 9), there has been<br />
significant activity in the area of patients<br />
admitted under the Crimes (Mental<br />
Impairment and Unfitness to be Tried) Act<br />
1997 (CMIA).<br />
During the year –<br />
• 7 patients were admitted to Thomas<br />
Embling Hospital on Custodial<br />
Supervision Orders (CSO), compared<br />
to eleven in 2003-<strong>2004</strong>. These orders<br />
are made following a finding of ‘not<br />
guilty by reason of mental impairment’<br />
at a person’s trial. At 30 June <strong>2005</strong><br />
however, there were 2 people subject<br />
to Custodial Supervision Orders made<br />
in late June who remained in prison<br />
awaiting a bed vacancy at Thomas<br />
Embling Hospital. It became common<br />
in <strong>2004</strong>-<strong>2005</strong> that if a person is in<br />
prison when the court makes a CSO,<br />
that person is required to wait in prison<br />
for 3-4 weeks before a bed becomes<br />
available at the Hospital.<br />
• 4 patients moved from the Thomas<br />
Embling Hospital to live full time in the<br />
community on extended leave. Two of<br />
these patients had utilised the Jardine<br />
Transition Program (page 21) prior to<br />
applying for extended leave.<br />
• 2 patients in the community had their<br />
extended leave suspended due to a<br />
relapse of their illness and were<br />
admitted to Thomas Embling Hospital.<br />
NON-CUSTODIAL<br />
SUPERVISION ORDERS<br />
• 8 Non Custodial Supervision Orders<br />
(NCSO) were made for new offenders<br />
(four more than 2003-<strong>2004</strong>).<br />
• 6 people on an NCSO were readmitted<br />
to hospital due to deterioration in their<br />
mental state. Three were admitted to<br />
their local mental health service, which<br />
reflects the growing trend for this group<br />
of patients to be supervised by<br />
<strong>Forensicare</strong>, but treated on a regular<br />
basis by their local service. Three of<br />
these admissions were to Thomas<br />
Embling Hospital, and 2 were<br />
admissions for a period over 3 months.<br />
One of patients readmitted remained in<br />
Thomas Embling Hospital for almost<br />
the entire reporting period.<br />
• Of the 40 clients in the community on<br />
NCSO’s at 30 June <strong>2005</strong>, 33 are<br />
supervised by <strong>Forensicare</strong>’s Community<br />
Forensic Mental Health Service, and 7<br />
supervised by area mental health<br />
services.<br />
• 1 person on a NCSO had their Order<br />
revoked. They will continue to reside<br />
in the community, without compulsory<br />
treatment under the CMIA.<br />
• The increasing trend for NCSO’s to be<br />
made by courts following a trial for less<br />
serious offences has continued. Only<br />
1 of the 8 NCSO’s made was for a<br />
person who had been found not guilty<br />
of attempted murder by reason<br />
of their mental impairment. The<br />
remaining orders, made by Judges<br />
in the County Court, were for a range<br />
of lesser offences including arson,<br />
obtaining financial advantage by<br />
deception, possessing equipment to<br />
traffick drugs or assault-type charges.<br />
During the year there were 17 Court<br />
hearings for people on Supervision Orders<br />
under the CMIA that involved <strong>Forensicare</strong><br />
staff. Each Court hearing involves<br />
considerable staff input and has a<br />
significant impact on the existing workload<br />
of all staff involved.<br />
Period Thomas Embling Hospital Community<br />
Custodial Supervision Extended Non-Custodial<br />
Orders Leave Order<br />
30 June <strong>2005</strong> 52 6 40<br />
30 June <strong>2004</strong> 48 6 33<br />
30 June 2003 40 4 23<br />
30 June 2002 36 6 19<br />
30 June 2001 28 11 13<br />
37