22.01.2015 Views

Fort Erie Creeks Watershed Plan - Niagara Peninsula Conservation ...

Fort Erie Creeks Watershed Plan - Niagara Peninsula Conservation ...

Fort Erie Creeks Watershed Plan - Niagara Peninsula Conservation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

planimetric adjustment. The index produces values that indicate whether the channel is “in<br />

regime” or stable (0.41).<br />

The RSAT provides a broader view of the system by also considering the ecological functioning<br />

of the stream (Galli, 1996). This includes observations of channel stability, scour/deposition,<br />

instream habitat, water quality, riparian conditions and biological indicators such as the<br />

abundance of benthic invertebrates. Each indicator was ranked numerically, a lower value<br />

indicates poorer stream health and a higher value represents a rich, healthy stream. The RSAT<br />

score ranks the channel as maintaining a low (35) degree of<br />

stream health. Also included in the RSAT are general observations of channel dimensions, such<br />

as bankfull widths and depths, substrate size, bank heights, vegetation cover, channel hardening<br />

and other disturbances.<br />

It should be noted that not all reaches have been walked in entirety due to accessibility and time<br />

constraints, and as a result, Table 2.4.1 represents conditions which partially characterize reaches<br />

which were observed during field reconnaissance in November and December 2005.<br />

Due to the fact that channel processes were inferred in the mapping and aerial photograph<br />

analysis, field conditions were confirmed through a detailed field investigation. As such, the<br />

following sections summarize results obtained from the detailed geomorphic assessment.<br />

Detailed Site Assessment<br />

Utilizing the combined RGA and RSAT scores, four reaches were chosen for more extensive<br />

characterization. Initially, five detailed sites were chosen (one on each creek) however, due to<br />

the marsh/backwater state of Beaver Creek; only one monitoring site was established in Reach<br />

BVC-2.<br />

The location of the detailed sites was determined based on the objective to provide representative<br />

coverage of the watershed, both from a spatial and morphologic perspective. Reach BLC-9 was<br />

chosen to provide conditions representative of Black Creek, while Reach SMC-2 was meant to<br />

provide representative data for Six Mile Creek (downstream end). Reaches FRC-9 and MLC-3<br />

provided insight into conditions along a particularly sensitive and geomorphologically active<br />

section of the Local Management Area of 2.18. Finally, BVC-2 was chosen to represent<br />

conditions at the downstream extent of the Beaver Creek where only 1 monitoring site was<br />

established.<br />

At each of the detailed sites, cross-sections were measured at ten locations, including pools,<br />

riffles and transitional areas. At each cross-section, bankfull widths and depths, entrenchment,<br />

as well as low flow dimensions were recorded. Substrate was sampled using a modified Wolman<br />

pebble count. Sub-pavement was also characterized at each cross-section. Bank assessment<br />

included measurements of heights, angle, bank composition, in-situ shear strength, vegetation<br />

and rooting depths. These 10 cross-sections were placed over a minimum of two meander<br />

wavelengths and included one control cross section located at top of bank. This control cross<br />

section involved the installation of permanent pins in order to allow for future monitoring.<br />

Erosion pins were also installed at each site to monitor rates of migration within the reach. A<br />

March 2008 37 <strong>Fort</strong> <strong>Erie</strong> <strong>Creeks</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Plan</strong><br />

General Report (105116)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!