22.01.2015 Views

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SE C T I ON 613. JURISDICTION TO MODIFY CHILD-SUPPORT ORDER OF<br />

ANOTHER STATE WHEN INDIVIDUAL PARTIES RESIDE IN THIS STATE .<br />

(a) If all of <strong>the</strong> parties who are individuals reside in this State state and <strong>the</strong> child does not<br />

reside in <strong>the</strong> issuing State state, a tribunal of this State state has jurisdiction <strong>to</strong> enforce and <strong>to</strong><br />

modify <strong>the</strong> issuing State’s state’s child-support order in a proceeding <strong>to</strong> register that order.<br />

(b) A tribunal of this State state exercising jurisdiction under this section shall apply <strong>the</strong><br />

provisions of [Articles] 1 and 2, this [article], and <strong>the</strong> procedural and substantive law of this State<br />

state <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> proceeding for enforcement or modification. [Articles] 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8 do not apply.<br />

Comment<br />

It is not unusual for <strong>the</strong> parties and <strong>the</strong> child subject <strong>to</strong> a child-support order <strong>to</strong> no longer<br />

reside in <strong>the</strong> issuing state, and for <strong>the</strong> individual parties <strong>to</strong> have moved <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> same new state.<br />

The result is that <strong>the</strong> child-support order remains enforceable, but <strong>the</strong> issuing tribunal no longer<br />

has continuing, exclusive jurisdiction <strong>to</strong> modify its order. A tribunal of <strong>the</strong> state of mutual<br />

residence of <strong>the</strong> individual parties has jurisdiction <strong>to</strong> modify <strong>the</strong> child-support order and assume<br />

continuing, exclusive jurisdiction. Although <strong>the</strong> individual parties must reside in <strong>the</strong> forum state,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is no requirement that <strong>the</strong> child must also reside in <strong>the</strong> forum state (although <strong>the</strong> child must<br />

have moved from <strong>the</strong> issuing state).<br />

Finally, because modification of <strong>the</strong> child-support order when all parties reside in <strong>the</strong> forum<br />

is essentially an intrastate matter, subsection (b) withdraws authority <strong>to</strong> apply most of <strong>the</strong><br />

substantive and procedural provisions of UIFSA, i.e., those found in <strong>the</strong> act o<strong>the</strong>r than in Articles<br />

1, 2, and 6. Note <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong> support obligation is a nonmodifiable aspect of <strong>the</strong> original<br />

controlling order, Section 611(c)-(d).<br />

SECTION 614. NOTICE TO ISSUING TRIBUNAL OF MODIFICATION. Within<br />

[30] days after issuance of a modified child-support order, <strong>the</strong> party obtaining <strong>the</strong> modification<br />

shall file a certified copy of <strong>the</strong> order with <strong>the</strong> issuing tribunal that had continuing, exclusive<br />

jurisdiction over <strong>the</strong> earlier order, and in each tribunal in which <strong>the</strong> party knows <strong>the</strong> earlier order<br />

has been registered. A party who obtains <strong>the</strong> order and fails <strong>to</strong> file a certified copy is subject <strong>to</strong><br />

appropriate sanctions by a tribunal in which <strong>the</strong> issue of failure <strong>to</strong> file arises. The failure <strong>to</strong> file<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!