2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comment The procedure for registration and enforcement set forth in sections 601 through 608 is applicable to a child-support order from a non-Convention country. This section provides coverage for modification in that situation. Presumptively, the general law of the state regarding modification of a child-support order will apply because, by their terms, sections 609 through 614 apply only to modification of a child-support order by a state tribunal. The rationale is that modification is available because the foreign order is not founded on the principles of continuing, exclusive jurisdiction and a controlling order. See sections 205 through 207. 150
ARTICLE 7 DETERMINATION OF PARENTAGE SUPPORT PROCEEDING UNDER CONVENTION Introductory Comment This article contains provisions adapted from the Convention that could not be readily integrated into the existing body of Articles 1 through 6. For the most part, extending the coverage of UIFSA (2008) to foreign countries was a satisfactory solution to merge the appropriate Convention terms into this act. In understanding this process, it must be clearly stated that the terms of the Convention are not substantive law. When the Senate has given its advice and consent, the Convention has been ratified by the President, and certain formal procedures have been completed, the Convention will become a multilateral treaty between the United States and the other Convention countries. As such, it will be the law of the land; but the treaty is not self-executing. See, Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. ___, 128 S.Ct. 1346, 170 L.Ed.2d 190 (2008). Thus, the ultimate enforcement of the treaty in the United States will be dependent on the enactment of both federal and state legislation. This act is predicated on the principle that the enactment of UIFSA (2008) will effectively implement the Convention through state law by amending Articles 1 through 6, plus the addition of this article. This will encourage international cooperation by emulating the interstate effect of UIFSA for international cases, especially those affected by the Convention. In relatively few instances, the provisions of the Convention are sufficiently specific that a choice was made between amending UIFSA accordingly, with a disproportionate effect on all support orders enforced under state law, or accommodating potential conflicts by creating a separate article to apply only to Convention support orders. The choice was to draft this article as state law to minimize disruption to interstate support orders, which constitute the vast majority of orders processed by under UIFSA. Note that this act is the substantive and procedural state law for: (1) responding to an application for establishment, recognition and enforcement, or modification of a Convention support order; and, (2) initiating an application to a Convention country for similar action. The four Hague maintenance conventions that preceded the 2007 Convention, and the three prior versions of UIFSA, have common goals. The distinctions between the jurisdictional rules in the common-law tradition in the United States, and the civil law systems in most of the countries that were parties to the earlier maintenance conventions, were obstacles to participation of the United States in any of the multilateral maintenance treaties (until recently). As the world has grown smaller and globalization has become the order of the day, reconciling the differences has become more and more important. Understanding the necessity for accommodation has made the task easier. This is not to say easy, as evidenced by the fact that the formal negotiations leading to the final text of the Convention spanned from May, 2003, to November, 2007. As of this writing, it remains unclear when the Convention will enter into force in the United States. Nonetheless, signing the Convention by the executive branch of the federal government on 151
Page 1 and 2:
SUBMITTED BY THE FAMILY LAW SECTION
Page 3 and 4:
EXHIBIT A UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY
Page 5 and 6:
DRAFTING COMMITTEE ON AMENDMENTS TO
Page 7 and 8:
UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT A
Page 9 and 10:
SECTION 606. PROCEDURE TO CONTEST V
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Uniform Interstate Family Support A
Page 15 and 16:
Beginning in June 2003, and continu
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
country in an initiating State from
Page 21 and 22:
(19) (24) “Responding tribunal”
Page 23 and 24:
Subsection (3) “Convention,” id
Page 25 and 26:
The vast bulk of child support esta
Page 27 and 28:
order from a nation state that is e
Page 29 and 30:
ARTICLE 2 JURISDICTION SECTION 201.
Page 31 and 32:
Under RURESA, multiple support orde
Page 33 and 34:
For example, a challenge to a reque
Page 35 and 36:
country; (2) the contesting party t
Page 37 and 38:
a child-support order of a tribunal
Page 39 and 40:
SECTION 206. CONTINUING JURISDICTIO
Page 41 and 42:
is an individual shall determine wh
Page 43 and 44:
personal jurisdiction over the obli
Page 45 and 46:
of equal dignity. In allocating pay
Page 47 and 48:
this State state has continuing, ex
Page 49 and 50:
individual petitioner requesting af
Page 51 and 52:
Comment Subsection (a) was designed
Page 53 and 54:
support order is based. (d) A respo
Page 55 and 56: enforcement agency will also assist
Page 57 and 58: (f) This [Act] [act] does not creat
Page 59 and 60: SECTION 309. PRIVATE COUNSEL. An in
Page 61 and 62: documents must conform substantiall
Page 63 and 64: hearing is presumed to have been re
Page 65 and 66: tribunal must give effect to such a
Page 67 and 68: substantive law should apply. Becau
Page 69 and 70: certified statement by the custodia
Page 71 and 72: (8) an individual who has been orde
Page 73 and 74: ARTICLE 5 ENFORCEMENT OF SUPPORT OR
Page 75 and 76: (3) medical support, whether in the
Page 77 and 78: Subsection (c)(3) provides that med
Page 79 and 80: SE C T I ON 506. CONTEST BY OBL IGO
Page 81 and 82: support enforcement agency shall re
Page 83 and 84: enforceable in the responding state
Page 85 and 86: Convention. Because child-support e
Page 87 and 88: SECTION 604. CHOICE OF LAW. (a) Exc
Page 89 and 90: identical manner as all other oblig
Page 91 and 92: the order (roughly the equivalent o
Page 93 and 94: to vacate the registration has the
Page 95 and 96: precludes the nonregistering party
Page 97 and 98: (1) the following requirements are
Page 99 and 100: The underlying policies of this pro
Page 101 and 102: continuing, exclusive jurisdiction
Page 103 and 104: SE C T I ON 613. JURISDICTION TO MO
Page 105: pursuant to this section is the con
Page 109 and 110: ehalf of a child, made through a ce
Page 111 and 112: SE C T I ON 702. APPLICABILITY. Thi
Page 113 and 114: country. (d) A tribunal of this sta
Page 115 and 116: in a Convention country and to an i
Page 117 and 118: interstate child support orders. To
Page 119 and 120: and partial recognition and enforce
Page 121 and 122: might raise a challenge based on la
Page 123 and 124: such rules permitted under the Conv
Page 125 and 126: egistered partner in a Convention c
Page 127 and 128: ORDER. SECTION 711. MODIFICATION OF
Page 129 and 130: Convention source: art. 38. Protect
Page 131 and 132: SECTION 802. CONDITIONS OF RENDITIO
show all

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?