22.01.2015 Views

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Comment<br />

UIFSA (1992) recognized that enforcement of child support across state lines might have<br />

an unintended consequence of putting an obligee or child at risk if domestic violence was<br />

involved in <strong>the</strong> past. This section is <strong>the</strong> latest version of <strong>the</strong> statu<strong>to</strong>ry formulation originally<br />

developed in UIFSA (1992), see <strong>Uniform</strong> Child Cus<strong>to</strong>dy Jurisdiction and Enforcement <strong>Act</strong><br />

§ 209. Public awareness of and sensitivity <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> dangers of domestic violence has significantly<br />

increased since interstate enforcement of support originated. This section authorizes<br />

confidentiality in instances where <strong>the</strong>re is a risk of domestic violence or child abduction. Section<br />

712, infra, incorporates language from <strong>the</strong> Convention <strong>to</strong> restrict dissemination of personal<br />

jurisdiction <strong>to</strong> protect victims of domestic violence.<br />

Although local law generally governs <strong>the</strong> conduct of <strong>the</strong> forum tribunal, state law may<br />

not provide for maintaining secrecy about <strong>the</strong> exact whereabouts of a litigant or o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

information ordinarily required <strong>to</strong> be disclosed under state law, i.e., Social Security number of<br />

<strong>the</strong> parties or <strong>the</strong> child. If so, this section creates a confidentiality provision that is particularly<br />

appropriate in light of <strong>the</strong> intractable problems associated with interstate parental kidnapping, see<br />

<strong>the</strong> Parental Kidnapping Prevention <strong>Act</strong> (PKPA), 28 U.S.C. § 1738A.<br />

Related <strong>to</strong> Convention: art. 38. Protection of personal data; art. 39. Confidentiality; art.<br />

40. Non-disclosure of information.<br />

SECTION 313. COSTS AND FEES.<br />

(a) The [petitioner] may not be required <strong>to</strong> pay a filing fee or o<strong>the</strong>r costs.<br />

(b) If an obligee prevails, a responding tribunal of this state may assess against an obligor<br />

filing fees, reasonable at<strong>to</strong>rney’s fees, o<strong>the</strong>r costs, and necessary travel and o<strong>the</strong>r reasonable<br />

expenses incurred by <strong>the</strong> obligee and <strong>the</strong> obligee’s witnesses. The tribunal may not assess fees,<br />

costs, or expenses against <strong>the</strong> obligee or <strong>the</strong> support enforcement agency of ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> initiating<br />

or responding State state or foreign country, except as provided by o<strong>the</strong>r law. At<strong>to</strong>rney’s fees<br />

may be taxed as costs, and may be ordered paid directly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rney, who may enforce <strong>the</strong><br />

order in <strong>the</strong> at<strong>to</strong>rney’s own name. Payment of support owed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> obligee has priority over fees,<br />

costs, and expenses.<br />

(c) The tribunal shall order <strong>the</strong> payment of costs and reasonable at<strong>to</strong>rney’s fees if it<br />

determines that a hearing was requested primarily for delay. In a proceeding under [Article] 6, a<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!