2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

foreign support agreement:
and expenses; and
(1) a security, bond, or deposit is not required to guarantee the payment of costs
(2) an obligee or obligor that in the issuing country has benefited from free legal
assistance is entitled to benefit, at least to the same extent, from any free legal assistance
provided for by the law of this state under the same circumstances.
(d) A [petitioner] filing a direct request is not entitled to assistance from the
[governmental entity].
(e) This [article] does not prevent the application of laws of this state that provide
simplified, more expeditious rules regarding a direct request for recognition and enforcement of
a foreign support order or foreign support agreement.
Comment
Given the long history of open courts in the United States, this section may seem
axiomatic, redundant, or unnecessary. In fact, it is important for the Convention to confirm that
an individual may file a petition directly to a tribunal of another country without the assistance of
a central authority or support enforcement agency. Given the variety of legal systems that may be
involved under the Convention, this freedom of choice is explicitly protected. A person residing
outside the United States, whether a citizen or a noncitizen, may apply to a U.S. tribunal for
establishment, recognition, and enforcement of a child support order or a spousal support order,
and in some situations for modification of an existing support order. Of course, the freedom of an
individual to petition for relief in a tribunal says nothing about the nature of legal representation,
if any. Implicit in the right of access to a tribunal is that representation may be pro se or by
private counsel. See Section 309.
Subsection (a) provides that an individual party may file a proceeding in a tribunal, thus
submitting to the jurisdiction of the tribunal and to state law. The object of the proceeding may
be establishment of a support order, determination of parentage of a child, or modification of an
existing support order.
Subsection (b) recognizes that an individual party may file a proceeding in a tribunal
requesting recognition and enforcement of a Convention support order, thereby choosing not to
seek the services of a central authority or Title IV-D agency. Nonetheless, the individual will be
affected indirectly by terms of the Convention because the proceeding is subject to Sections 706
through 713, which are drawn from the Convention. This effect applies to an individual residing
158