22.01.2015 Views

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

2008 Amendments to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

with multiple orders and obtaining a determination of <strong>the</strong> controlling order as expeditiously as<br />

possible. This agency duty correlates <strong>to</strong> new Subsection 602(d) regarding <strong>the</strong> registration process<br />

and cases with multiple orders.<br />

Subsection (d) imposes a duty of currency conversion on a support enforcement agency<br />

similar <strong>to</strong> that imposed on an initiating tribunal in Section 304(b).<br />

Read in conjunction with Section 319, subsection (e) requires <strong>the</strong> state support<br />

enforcement agency <strong>to</strong> facilitate redirection of <strong>the</strong> stream of child support in order that payments<br />

be more efficiently received by <strong>the</strong> obligee.<br />

Subsection (f) explicitly states that UIFSA nei<strong>the</strong>r creates nor rejects <strong>the</strong> establishment of<br />

an at<strong>to</strong>rney-client or fiduciary relationship between <strong>the</strong> support enforcement agency and a<br />

petitioner receiving services from that agency. This once-highly controversial issue is left <strong>to</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>rwise applicable state law, which generally has concluded that at<strong>to</strong>rneys employed by a state<br />

support enforcement agency do not form an at<strong>to</strong>rney-client relationship with ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> parties or<br />

<strong>the</strong> child as <strong>the</strong> ultimate obligee.<br />

Related <strong>to</strong> Convention: art. 35. Transfer of funds.<br />

SECTION 308. DUTY OF [STATE OFFICIAL OR AGENCY].<br />

(a) If <strong>the</strong> [appropriate state official or agency] determines that <strong>the</strong> support enforcement<br />

agency is neglecting or refusing <strong>to</strong> provide services <strong>to</strong> an individual, <strong>the</strong> [state official or agency]<br />

may order <strong>the</strong> agency <strong>to</strong> perform its duties under this [<strong>Act</strong>] [act] or may provide those services<br />

directly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> individual.<br />

(b) The [appropriate state official or agency] may determine that a foreign country or<br />

political subdivision has established a reciprocal arrangement for child support with this State<br />

state and take appropriate action for notification of <strong>the</strong> determination.<br />

Comment<br />

Subsection (b) makes clear that a state has a variety of options in determining <strong>the</strong> scope<br />

of its support enforcement program. In <strong>the</strong> absence of controlling federal action declaring a<br />

foreign jurisdiction <strong>to</strong> be a reciprocating country or political subdivision. See Section<br />

102(21)(B)(i). Each state may designate an official with authority <strong>to</strong> make a statewide, binding<br />

determination recognizing a foreign country or political subdivision as having a reciprocal<br />

arrangement with that state.<br />

102

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!