28.01.2015 Views

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On six <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se premises, police also found items associated with drug supply. These included items commonly used for wrapping and<br />

cutting powder drugs. <strong>Police</strong> also found scales on one premises, and documents that <strong>the</strong>y believed were associated with drug supply on<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r. Syringes were located on seven <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eight non-domestic drug premises. 603 Quantities <strong>of</strong> money were found on four separate<br />

premises. These quantities ranged from $190 to $2,360.<br />

While it is not necessary for police to find drugs for premises to be considered to be drug premises, prohibited drugs were found on six <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> eight premises. The quantities <strong>of</strong> drugs found ranged from 0.06 to 73 grams <strong>of</strong> heroin.<br />

At court, it was proved beyond reasonable doubt that all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se eight premises were drug premises.<br />

Case study 19.<br />

Non-domestic fortified drug premises in Cabramatta<br />

Several weeks after <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> came into operation, plain-clo<strong>the</strong>s police attended a unit in Cabramatta, acting on intelligence reports<br />

that had been received in relation to <strong>the</strong> premises. <strong>Police</strong> conducted surveillance, and also approached several drug users <strong>the</strong>y<br />

had seen approach <strong>the</strong> premises who admitted having purchased cocaine from <strong>the</strong> unit.<br />

<strong>Police</strong> applied for, and were granted, a drug premises search warrant.<br />

The ground floor balcony <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit was enclosed by a metal cage covered with heavy mesh. There were two doors at <strong>the</strong><br />

entrance, an external one made <strong>of</strong> heavy metal, with a timber door behind it. According to <strong>the</strong> event narrative, police found <strong>the</strong><br />

following items inside <strong>the</strong> unit:<br />

… a number <strong>of</strong> items related to <strong>the</strong> intravenous use <strong>of</strong> prohibited drugs. These included syringes, wrappings, swabs, smoking<br />

pipe and razor blades. They also located documents with figures believed to relate to drug transactions. 604<br />

The documents found included a book that appeared to be a ledger with phone numbers, records <strong>of</strong> names and amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

money owing. <strong>Police</strong> also found an envelope with figures written down it and a page from an exercise book with figures down<br />

one side, and a lot <strong>of</strong> writing in a foreign language down <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. 605 When questioned during <strong>the</strong> court proceedings, a police<br />

witness said: “in my experience, I’ve seen figures like this on a number <strong>of</strong> occasions … indicating a ledger to do with <strong>the</strong> supply <strong>of</strong><br />

prohibited drugs.” 606 No drugs or cash were located during <strong>the</strong> search.<br />

The unit was unfurnished, except for a single mattress in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bedrooms. There was no fridge and minor to nil kitchenware.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cupboards were bare. <strong>Police</strong> concluded that <strong>the</strong> unit could “not be described as a normal residential home”. 607<br />

Two men were charged with being found on drug premises: <strong>the</strong> young man who opened <strong>the</strong> door, and ano<strong>the</strong>r man in his forties.<br />

A third man found on <strong>the</strong> premises, <strong>the</strong> occupier, was also charged with allowing his premises to be used as a drug premises.<br />

Both <strong>of</strong> those charged with being found on a drug premises were convicted and sentenced to twelve months imprisonment,<br />

subsequently appealed, and each had <strong>the</strong>ir sentences reduced to four months. Charges against <strong>the</strong> occupant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unit <strong>of</strong><br />

allowing his premises to be used as a drug premises were dismissed. This court case is discussed in detail in <strong>the</strong> chapter,<br />

“Offences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong>”.<br />

Case study 20.<br />

Non–domestic fortified drug premises in Cabramatta<br />

<strong>Police</strong> executed ano<strong>the</strong>r search warrant on a similar type <strong>of</strong> premises. When <strong>of</strong>ficers attempted to enter <strong>the</strong> unit, <strong>the</strong>y found that<br />

a chair had been wedged behind <strong>the</strong> door. There was also a metal plate near <strong>the</strong> door lock that police alleged was an attempt to<br />

secure and streng<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> entrance door.<br />

When police entered <strong>the</strong> unit, <strong>the</strong>y found a number <strong>of</strong> items relating to <strong>the</strong> intravenous use <strong>of</strong> prohibited drugs, including used<br />

syringes, swabs and spoons. They also found a meat cleaver and a knife on a metal rod near <strong>the</strong> front entrance, and a set <strong>of</strong><br />

scales, packets <strong>of</strong> balloons, and aluminium foil. In <strong>the</strong> event narrative, <strong>the</strong> premises was described in <strong>the</strong> following way:<br />

603 See <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 11 (d).<br />

604 COPS event narrative, Cabramatta LAC, <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> Incident 3.<br />

605 Liverpool Local Court, <strong>Police</strong> v Dang Nguyen, 4 December <strong>2001</strong>.<br />

606 Ibid, p.9.<br />

607 COPS event narrative, Cabramatta LAC, <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> Incident 3.<br />

114<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!