28.01.2015 Views

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A fortification removal notice is reviewable by <strong>the</strong> Supreme Court.<br />

If <strong>the</strong> fortifications are not removed within seven days, police may remove or modify <strong>the</strong> fortifications on <strong>the</strong> premises. To do so, <strong>the</strong>y may<br />

enter and secure <strong>the</strong> premises without a warrant and are authorised to use any reasonable force and equipment necessary. If <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong><br />

Commissioner removes <strong>the</strong> fortification, <strong>the</strong> net costs <strong>of</strong> removal may be recovered from <strong>the</strong> owner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premises as a debt. 156<br />

3.3.3. South Australia’s Statutes Amendment (Anti-Fortifications) <strong>Act</strong> 2003<br />

In 2003, <strong>the</strong> South Australian Government passed <strong>the</strong> Statutes Amendment (Anti-Fortifications) <strong>Act</strong> 2003 (<strong>the</strong> Anti-Fortifications <strong>Act</strong>),<br />

inserting provisions into <strong>the</strong> South Australian Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong> 1953 in relation to fortified premises. The legislation was intended to<br />

deal with similar issues to <strong>the</strong> Western Australian legislation, as some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> OMCGs <strong>of</strong> concern operate across both states.<br />

The South Australian law appears to have been introduced to overcome <strong>the</strong> same operational difficulties faced by police in <strong>NSW</strong> and<br />

Western Australia in gaining entry to fortified premises. However, like <strong>the</strong> Western Australian <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>the</strong> South Australian law is aimed at<br />

OMCG clubhouses, ra<strong>the</strong>r than at premises that are specifically used for illicit drug manufacture or supply. The South Australian Attorney<br />

General explained <strong>the</strong> impetus for <strong>the</strong> introduction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation in <strong>the</strong> following way:<br />

This bill … [is to] give effect to <strong>the</strong> government’s election promise to enact laws to prevent criminal organisations such as those<br />

known as outlaw motorcycle gangs fortifying <strong>the</strong>ir clubrooms and o<strong>the</strong>r premises to prevent police access and to give <strong>the</strong> police<br />

<strong>the</strong> power in appropriate circumstances to require <strong>the</strong> removal or modification <strong>of</strong> fortifications where <strong>the</strong>y have been constructed<br />

… If police <strong>of</strong>ficers cannot swiftly execute search warrants, for example, <strong>the</strong> criminals who occupy <strong>the</strong>se fortresses are given an<br />

opportunity to conceal or destroy evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir criminal behaviour. 157<br />

The Anti-Fortifications <strong>Act</strong> provides that local councils in receipt <strong>of</strong> development applications forward <strong>the</strong>se to <strong>the</strong> Commissioner for <strong>Police</strong><br />

if <strong>the</strong>y believe that <strong>the</strong>y involve <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> fortifications. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, fortifications are defined as:<br />

… any security measure that involves a structure or device forming part <strong>of</strong>, or attached to, premises that -<br />

(a)<br />

is intended or designed to prevent or impede police access to <strong>the</strong> premises; or<br />

(b) has, or could have, <strong>the</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> preventing or impeding police access to <strong>the</strong> premises and is excessive for <strong>the</strong> particular type<br />

<strong>of</strong> premises. 158<br />

If <strong>the</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> <strong>Police</strong> determines that <strong>the</strong> application, or part <strong>of</strong> it, involves <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> fortifications, <strong>the</strong> council must refuse <strong>the</strong><br />

application, or <strong>the</strong> part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> application that involves <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> fortifications. 159<br />

The legislation also enables police to deal with premises where fortifications already exist by permitting <strong>the</strong> Commissioner to apply to<br />

<strong>the</strong> magistrate’s court for a fortification removal order. Such an order will be issued by <strong>the</strong> court if <strong>the</strong> fortifications are in contravention <strong>of</strong><br />

relevant planning laws, or if <strong>the</strong>re are reasonable grounds to believe <strong>the</strong> premises are being, have been, or are likely to be used:<br />

(a)<br />

for or in connection with <strong>the</strong> commission <strong>of</strong> a serious criminal <strong>of</strong>fence, or<br />

(b) to conceal evidence <strong>of</strong> a serious criminal <strong>of</strong>fence, or<br />

(c) to keep <strong>the</strong> proceeds <strong>of</strong> a serious criminal <strong>of</strong>fence. 160<br />

The order must state that <strong>the</strong> fortifications are to be removed or modified within a specified time period, which cannot be less than 14<br />

days. It must be served on <strong>the</strong> occupier/s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premises or fixed to <strong>the</strong> premises “at a prominent place at or near to <strong>the</strong> entrance”. 161<br />

Like <strong>the</strong> Western Australian legislation, statutory rights <strong>of</strong> appeal against <strong>the</strong> removal order are created. The <strong>Act</strong> also provides <strong>the</strong><br />

Commissioner with powers to give effect to <strong>the</strong> orders by removing <strong>the</strong> fortifications, and to recover <strong>the</strong> costs <strong>of</strong> removal.<br />

156 The Hon. Dr Gallop. Hansard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislative Assembly <strong>of</strong> Western Australia. 6 November <strong>2001</strong> p. 5038.<br />

157 The Hon. M.J.Atkinson, Hansard <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> South Australian House <strong>of</strong> Assembly, 16 September 2003.<br />

158 Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong> 1953, s. 74BA.<br />

159 Development <strong>Act</strong> 1993, s. 37A.<br />

160 Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong> 1953, s. 74BB.<br />

161 Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong> 1953, s. 74 BD.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!