28.01.2015 Views

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The unit was in disarray, with sparse furnishings. There was little food located within <strong>the</strong> refrigerator/kitchen cupboards. The<br />

unit could not be described as a normal place <strong>of</strong> residence. 608<br />

There was also evidence that drugs had been destroyed just prior to police entry to <strong>the</strong> unit. When police went into <strong>the</strong><br />

bathroom, <strong>the</strong>y saw <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

The grate to <strong>the</strong> shower waste was broken and <strong>the</strong> walls and floor <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shower were wet. An inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shower waste<br />

police located a number <strong>of</strong> plastic bags, similar to plastic bags located in one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bedrooms. A closer inspection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

drain pipe, police located a plastic bag containing a quantity <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>f white powder. <strong>Police</strong> will allege that this white powder is<br />

a prohibited drug, cocaine. At <strong>the</strong> water level inside <strong>the</strong> drain, police observed two small balloons and a pen which could not<br />

be retrieved. 609<br />

<strong>Police</strong> also found property that <strong>the</strong>y suspected had been stolen, including mobile phones, watches, and a power tool. Both<br />

occupants, who were Asian males in <strong>the</strong>ir twenties, were charged with being found on drug premises. Both were convicted, and<br />

received custodial sentences <strong>of</strong> three and six months.<br />

7.4.3. Domestic drug premises with fortifications<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> 34 premises upon which <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> was used over <strong>the</strong> review period, including domestic and non-domestic drug premises, security<br />

measures were noted in respect <strong>of</strong> 15 premises. Ten <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se were domestic residences.<br />

The type <strong>of</strong> security measures noted by police on <strong>the</strong> ten domestic drug premises included:<br />

• a fortified door, and an interior timber door, with a large metal bar across <strong>the</strong> middle<br />

• a metal security door, and an interior timber door that was blocked <strong>of</strong>f by furniture<br />

• two deadlocks and two chains<br />

• a security screen door with a hole cut in it - police alleged drug transactions were conducted through <strong>the</strong> hole<br />

• a heavily fortified premises with cream steel mesh on <strong>the</strong> front door and metal bars on <strong>the</strong> windows<br />

• <strong>the</strong> premises were fortified (no fur<strong>the</strong>r details provided)<br />

• <strong>the</strong> window and front door were heavily fortified with steel bars<br />

• white steel bars on all windows and doors<br />

• a screen mesh front door with a solid wooden door behind it, windows fortified with steel bars and<br />

• <strong>the</strong> premises were fortified with a large metal fence with an electronic gate, and <strong>the</strong>re was a secure area at <strong>the</strong> rear <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

house with security bars surrounding it. 610<br />

7.4.4. Changes in <strong>the</strong> types <strong>of</strong> drug premises over <strong>the</strong> review period<br />

Eight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 22 611 drug premises identified in <strong>the</strong> first year <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, about 36%, were described as non-domestic. None in <strong>the</strong> second<br />

year were described as non-domestic. While 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 22 premises in <strong>the</strong> first year were described as fortified, just four in <strong>the</strong> second year<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> were described in this way.<br />

This suggests that <strong>the</strong> type <strong>of</strong> drug premises upon which <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> was used in Cabramatta changed over <strong>the</strong> review period. <strong>Police</strong> we<br />

spoke to also considered that this was <strong>the</strong> case. One Cabramatta detective commented in July 2003:<br />

Now <strong>the</strong>re is a tendency for <strong>the</strong>m [drug premises] to be more domestic. In <strong>the</strong> first year, all <strong>the</strong> steel doors, <strong>the</strong>y had a mattress and<br />

that was it, now <strong>the</strong>y are actually living in <strong>the</strong>m. 612<br />

In parliamentary debate on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, and o<strong>the</strong>r forums, including submissions received to our discussion paper, concerns were expressed<br />

about <strong>the</strong> application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> to premises used for a dual purpose. For instance, while raising concerns about <strong>the</strong> ability<br />

<strong>of</strong> a person found on drug premises to prove that <strong>the</strong>y were <strong>the</strong>re for a lawful purpose, one member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Legislative Council said:<br />

608 COPS event narrative, Cabramatta LAC, <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> Incident 4.<br />

609 Ibid.<br />

610 COPS event narratives, Cabramatta LAC.<br />

611 The <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> was used on 24 occasions in Cabramatta in <strong>the</strong> first year that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> was in operation, from 1 July <strong>2001</strong> to 30 June 2002 ,<br />

but two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se uses were on cars.<br />

612 Focus group, Cabramatta <strong>Police</strong>, 2 July 2003.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!