28.01.2015 Views

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4.2.4. Presenting <strong>the</strong> application before an authorised justice<br />

Once <strong>the</strong> search warrant application has been prepared, it is <strong>the</strong>n put before an authorised justice, usually a local magistrate. 209<br />

In order for a drug premises search warrant to be issued, <strong>the</strong> authorised justice must also be satisfied that <strong>the</strong>re are reasonable grounds<br />

for issuing it. Section 5 (2) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> states:<br />

An authorised justice to whom such an application is made may, if satisfied that <strong>the</strong>re are reasonable grounds for doing so, issue a<br />

search warrant authorising any police <strong>of</strong>ficer to enter and search <strong>the</strong> premises. 210<br />

Applications are usually presented in person, though <strong>the</strong>re is provision in <strong>the</strong> Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong> for <strong>the</strong> issuing <strong>of</strong> search warrants<br />

over <strong>the</strong> telephone. 211 The information in <strong>the</strong> search warrant must also be later verified on oath before <strong>the</strong> magistrate, or by affirmation or<br />

affidavit. 212<br />

In training material on search warrant applications, police are advised to have all relevant documentation when <strong>the</strong>y put <strong>the</strong>ir application<br />

before an authorised justice to ensure police can immediately “produce information to substantiate any aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> application”. 213<br />

Officers are also told to “expect <strong>the</strong> authorised justice to assess and test <strong>the</strong> material you present very carefully before accepting it”. 214<br />

The Standard Operating Procedures on Search Warrants issue <strong>the</strong> following advice to police:<br />

Do not assume that <strong>the</strong> Justice assessing information contained within <strong>the</strong> application for a warrant will “rubber stamp” it. The<br />

Justice will objectively assess <strong>the</strong> application and rigorously test its probity before finally accepting and issuing a warrant. 215<br />

Guidance on what to consider in determining if reasonable grounds exist to grant <strong>the</strong> search warrant is provided in <strong>the</strong> Search Warrants<br />

<strong>Act</strong>. The <strong>Act</strong> states <strong>the</strong> following:<br />

1) An authorised justice when determining whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re are reasonable grounds to issue a search warrant is to consider (but is<br />

not limited to considering) <strong>the</strong> following matters:<br />

a. <strong>the</strong> reliability <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information on which <strong>the</strong> application is based, including <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> information,<br />

b. if <strong>the</strong> warrant is required to search for a thing in relation to an alleged <strong>of</strong>fence- whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>re is sufficient connection between<br />

<strong>the</strong> thing sought and <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence. 216<br />

4.2.5. Does <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> lower <strong>the</strong> threshold for obtaining search warrants<br />

Concern was expressed in parliamentary debate and in submissions to our discussion paper that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> lowered <strong>the</strong><br />

threshold for obtaining search warrants in <strong>NSW</strong>. North and North West Community Legal Service expressed this concern, and believed<br />

that as a consequence, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> would lead to <strong>the</strong> “targeting and over policing <strong>of</strong> already marginalised and vulnerable groups”. 217<br />

The Legal Service recommended that <strong>the</strong> requirement for obtaining search warrants under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> be <strong>the</strong> same as<br />

<strong>the</strong> requirement in <strong>the</strong> Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong>, that police must have a reasonable belief that <strong>the</strong>re is a particular thing connected with a<br />

particular narcotics <strong>of</strong>fence on <strong>the</strong> premises. 218<br />

While police have not reported any difficulties in obtaining drug premises search warrants under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y have not indicated that<br />

drug premises search warrants are any easier to obtain than Part 2 search warrants. <strong>Police</strong> who we have spoken to for this review have<br />

commented that different types <strong>of</strong> evidence are required in order to obtain a drug premises search warrant, as opposed to a Part 2 search<br />

warrant. A former Crime Manager from Cabramatta noted that:<br />

209 An authorised justice is defined as a magistrate, a justice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peace who is also a Clerk <strong>of</strong> a local court, or a justice <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peace who is<br />

employed by <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Courts Administration and who has been declared by <strong>the</strong> Minister who is administers <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> to be an authorised<br />

justice for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>. Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong> Part 1(3).<br />

210 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong>, s. 5(1)<br />

211 These provisions are contained in Section 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong>. This section stipulates that an authorised justice is not able to issue a<br />

telephone warrant unless <strong>the</strong>y are “satisfied that <strong>the</strong> warrant is required urgently and that it is not practicable for <strong>the</strong> application to be made in<br />

person” (s.12(3)).<br />

212 Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong>, s. 11(2).<br />

213 <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Police</strong>, Law Notes 4 <strong>of</strong> 2003 Making Better Search Warrant Applications- Part 1.<br />

214 <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Police</strong>, Law Notes 6 <strong>of</strong> 2003 Making Better Search Warrant Applications- Part 3.<br />

215 <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Police</strong>, Standard Operating Procedures, Search Warrants, p. 8, undated.<br />

216 Search Warrants <strong>Act</strong>, s 12A(2)(a) and (b)<br />

217 Submission, North and North West Legal Service, 1 August 2003. The Legal Service recommended that <strong>the</strong> in order to obtain a search warrant,<br />

police should be required to have reasonable grounds for believing <strong>the</strong>re are “things connected with a particular narcotics <strong>of</strong>fence” on <strong>the</strong><br />

premises. This is <strong>the</strong> same requirement for obtaining search warrants for drug related <strong>of</strong>fences that is contained in s. 5(1)(c) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Search<br />

Warrants <strong>Act</strong>. Similar concerns were also expressed in a submission we received from <strong>the</strong> East Area Tenants Service, dated 31 July 2003.<br />

218 Submission, North and North West Community Legal Service, 1 August 2003.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!