Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
elieve is in a public place with <strong>the</strong> intention <strong>of</strong> supplying drugs, to leave <strong>the</strong> area for a prescribed period <strong>of</strong> time. <strong>Police</strong> may issue a<br />
similar direction to a person who <strong>the</strong>y believe is in a public place for <strong>the</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> buying prohibited drugs. These new drug move-on<br />
provisions aim to assist police in dealing with drug transactions that occur in public places. 28<br />
1.3.3. Offences and penalties created by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong><br />
The <strong>Act</strong> creates several key <strong>of</strong>fences relating to drug premises. These <strong>of</strong>fences are:<br />
• being on, entering or leaving drug premises 29<br />
• allowing use <strong>of</strong> premises as drug premises 30 and<br />
• organising drug premises. 31<br />
A person cannot be convicted <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above <strong>of</strong>fences unless it is first proven in court that premises are drug premises. 32<br />
Several o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong>fences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> relate to <strong>the</strong> obstruction <strong>of</strong> police during <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search warrant. A person may be convicted<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences even if premises are not proven to be drug premises.<br />
It is also an <strong>of</strong>fence to disobey a drug related reasonable direction (also known as a drug move-on), provided that it has been issued in<br />
accordance with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>. 33 There is no custodial penalty for this <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
28 The Hon. R. Debus, <strong>NSW</strong>PD, 30 May <strong>2001</strong>, p. 13999.<br />
29 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12.<br />
30 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 13.<br />
31 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 14.<br />
32 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 11(1).<br />
33 Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong>, s. 28F(6). Disobeying a reasonable direction is only an <strong>of</strong>fence if <strong>the</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficer has complied with certain procedural<br />
requirements when <strong>the</strong>y issue <strong>the</strong> direction, and if after giving a first direction, “<strong>the</strong> person initially refuses to comply, <strong>the</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficer may again<br />
give <strong>the</strong> direction and, in that case, warn <strong>the</strong> person that failure to comply with <strong>the</strong> direction may be an <strong>of</strong>fence.” Summary Offences <strong>Act</strong>, s. 28F(5).<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 13