Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
Review of the Police Powers (Drug Premises) Act 2001 - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Once police have entered <strong>the</strong> suspected drug premises, according to section 7 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, <strong>the</strong>y are empowered to do any or all <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> following:<br />
(a)<br />
search any person on <strong>the</strong> premises, and<br />
(b) arrest or o<strong>the</strong>rwise proceed against any person on <strong>the</strong> premises, and<br />
(c) seize any firearm or o<strong>the</strong>r thing found on <strong>the</strong> premises that <strong>the</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficer has reasonable grounds for believing is<br />
connected with an <strong>of</strong>fence, and<br />
(d) without limiting paragraph (c), seize any prohibited drug and money found on <strong>the</strong> premises and any syringe or o<strong>the</strong>r thing that<br />
is kept or used in connection with, or that relates to, any activity prohibited by or under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> Misuse and Trafficking <strong>Act</strong><br />
1985, and<br />
(e) require any person on <strong>the</strong> premises to state his or her full name and residential address. 93<br />
3.1.2. Offences created by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong><br />
There are several key <strong>of</strong>fences that are created by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong>.<br />
Section 12 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> provides:<br />
12. Offence <strong>of</strong> entering, or being on, drug premises<br />
(a) A person who is found on, or who is found entering or leaving, drug premises is guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence. 94<br />
Secondly, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> includes <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> allowing premises to be used as drug premises. Section 13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> provides:<br />
A person who is <strong>the</strong> owner or occupier <strong>of</strong> any premises must not knowingly allow <strong>the</strong> premises to be used as drug premises. 95<br />
The third key <strong>of</strong>fence in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> is <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> organizing, conducting or assisting drug premises. Section 14(1) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> provides:<br />
A person must not organise or conduct, or assist in organizing or conducting, any drug premises.<br />
A person cannot be convicted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> unless it is first proven that premises are drug premises. The<br />
<strong>Act</strong> reads as follows:<br />
A court must not find a person guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence against this Part unless <strong>the</strong> prosecution satisfies <strong>the</strong> court beyond a reasonable<br />
doubt that at <strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence is alleged to have been committed any premises involved in <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence were being used for <strong>the</strong><br />
unlawful supply or manufacture <strong>of</strong> a prohibited drug. 96<br />
In determining whe<strong>the</strong>r premises were used for <strong>the</strong> purposes <strong>of</strong> drug manufacture or supply, a court may have regard to any or all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
indicia in section 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>. However, <strong>the</strong> court is not limited to <strong>the</strong>se indicia in determining if premises are drug premises.<br />
On certain matters relevant to determining whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong> being found on drug premises and <strong>of</strong> organising drug premises have<br />
been committed, <strong>the</strong> onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> rests on <strong>the</strong> accused. For example, section 12(2) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> provides that:<br />
(2) A person is not guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence under this section if <strong>the</strong> person satisfies <strong>the</strong> court that he or she was on, or was entering or<br />
leaving, <strong>the</strong> drug premises for a lawful purpose, or with a lawful excuse. 97<br />
Therefore, if a person is found on, entering or leaving drug premises, under section 12(2) <strong>the</strong>y have a statutory defence available to <strong>the</strong>m<br />
if <strong>the</strong>y can prove that <strong>the</strong>y had a lawful purpose or excuse to be on <strong>the</strong> premises. If a person is charged under section 14 with organising,<br />
conducting, or assisting in organising or conducting drug premises, <strong>the</strong>y also have a statutory defence available to <strong>the</strong>m. Subsection<br />
14(3) stipulates that a person cannot be found guilty <strong>of</strong> this <strong>of</strong>fence if <strong>the</strong>y satisfy <strong>the</strong> court that <strong>the</strong>y did not know and could not<br />
reasonably be expected to have known, that <strong>the</strong> premises were drug premises. 98 The standard to which <strong>the</strong> accused must establish <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
93 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 7.<br />
94 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12(1).<br />
95 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 13.<br />
96 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 11(1).<br />
97 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12 (2).<br />
98 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 14 (3).<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 29