80 <strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong>
Chapter 6. The <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> - new <strong>of</strong>fences 6.1. Overview In this chapter, we discuss <strong>the</strong> new <strong>of</strong>fences created by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, using case studies from court proceedings to illustrate aspects <strong>of</strong> how <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences have been considered in court. We will also discuss concerns that were raised about <strong>the</strong> reversal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> in relation to two <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>: one <strong>of</strong> being found on, entering or leaving drug premises, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> organising or assisting drug premises. Demographic information about people who were charged with <strong>of</strong>fences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong>, and where available, information on pleas entered into, and court outcomes for defendants, is also provided. 6.2. Offences created by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> The <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> creates three key <strong>of</strong>fences 423 relating to drug premises. These <strong>of</strong>fences are: • being on, entering or leaving drug premises 424 • organising, conducting, or assisting in organising or conducting, drug premises and 425 • allowing use <strong>of</strong> premises as drug premises. 426 A person cannot be convicted <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> above <strong>of</strong>fences unless it is first proven in court that <strong>the</strong> premises in question are drug premises. 427 In addition, a person cannot be found guilty <strong>of</strong> being found on, entering or leaving drug premises if <strong>the</strong>y satisfy <strong>the</strong> court that <strong>the</strong>y had a lawful purpose, or a lawful excuse, for being <strong>the</strong>re. 428 Similarly, if a person is charged with organising, conducting, or assisting in organising or conducting drug premises, <strong>the</strong>y cannot be found guilty if <strong>the</strong>y satisfy <strong>the</strong> court that <strong>the</strong>y did not know, or could not reasonably be expected to have known, that <strong>the</strong> premises were drug premises. 429 The maximum penalty for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences is 12 months imprisonment, or a fine <strong>of</strong> $5,000, or both. For a second or subsequent <strong>of</strong>fence under each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se provisions, <strong>the</strong> maximum penalty increases to five years imprisonment, a fine <strong>of</strong> $55,000, or both. 430 The figure below shows <strong>the</strong> numbers <strong>of</strong> charges laid in <strong>NSW</strong> for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences over <strong>the</strong> review period. The number <strong>of</strong> drug premises charges laid in each LAC in <strong>NSW</strong> is presented in <strong>the</strong> Appendix <strong>of</strong> this report. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> charges that were laid under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong> <strong>Act</strong> during <strong>the</strong> review period were for <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> being found on, entering or leaving drug premises. A total <strong>of</strong> 220 charges were laid for this <strong>of</strong>fence. A total <strong>of</strong> 108 charges were laid for <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> allowing a premises to be used as a drug premises. A total <strong>of</strong> 66 charges were laid for <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> organising or assisting drug premises. 423 Several o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong>fences in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Act</strong> relate to <strong>the</strong> obstruction <strong>of</strong> police during <strong>the</strong> execution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> search warrant, and for failing to state full name and address to police . A person may be convicted <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se <strong>of</strong>fences even if premises are not proven to be drug premises. <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 9. 424 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12. 425 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 14. 426 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 13. 427 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 11(1). 428 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12(2). 429 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 14(3). 430 <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong>, s. 12, 13 and 14 <strong>NSW</strong> Ombudsman <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Police</strong> <strong>Powers</strong> (<strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Premises</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2001</strong> 81
- Page 1 and 2:
Review of the Police Powers (Drug P
- Page 3 and 4:
Contents Preface ..................
- Page 5 and 6:
Chapter 11. Drug move-on powers in
- Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements This report was re
- Page 9 and 10:
Part One. Background. Chapter 1. In
- Page 11 and 12:
Drug offences, unlike for example,
- Page 13 and 14:
elieve is in a public place with th
- Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 2. Methodology In this chap
- Page 17 and 18:
2.3.5. Health data NSP distribution
- Page 19 and 20:
As the table indicates, more than o
- Page 21 and 22:
2.4.7. Complaints The NSW Ombudsman
- Page 23 and 24:
NSW Police advised us that calculat
- Page 25 and 26:
Another data limitation is that COP
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 3. Legislative survey This
- Page 29 and 30: Once police have entered the suspec
- Page 31 and 32: The table below sets out the penalt
- Page 33 and 34: (c) that the nature and extent of t
- Page 35 and 36: The Act contains four additional in
- Page 37 and 38: A fortification removal notice is r
- Page 39 and 40: For example, section 39(3) of the Q
- Page 41 and 42: Part Two. Drug premises Chapter 4.
- Page 43 and 44: In the police training manual on th
- Page 45 and 46: Case study 2. Drug premises search
- Page 47 and 48: 4.2.4. Presenting the application b
- Page 49 and 50: A Crime Manager we interviewed from
- Page 51 and 52: applications. In this Act, an inves
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 5. The definition of drug p
- Page 55 and 56: 5.2. Recommendation That Parliament
- Page 57 and 58: 5.5.2. Section 11(2)(b): fortificat
- Page 59 and 60: In our chapter on Cabramatta, we di
- Page 61 and 62: The woman was found guilty of allow
- Page 63 and 64: 5.5.5. Means or devices for drug us
- Page 65 and 66: Number of Premises Figure 7. Razor
- Page 67 and 68: However, no other evidence of drug
- Page 69 and 70: • magnum revolver and a 0.357 mag
- Page 71 and 72: 5.5.8. Section 11(2)(g): large amou
- Page 73 and 74: The magistrate noted that there wer
- Page 75 and 76: In relation to the money located on
- Page 77 and 78: 5.7.6. Cars as drug premises As we
- Page 79: … rather than being on the edge o
- Page 83 and 84: • the offence of being found on,
- Page 85 and 86: With reverse onus, we didn’t have
- Page 87 and 88: In the following section, we will d
- Page 89 and 90: Officers from the State Crime Comma
- Page 91 and 92: The second reading speech, which gi
- Page 93 and 94: In the granny flat, police found ca
- Page 95 and 96: Table 6. Pleas entered and court ou
- Page 97 and 98: The magistrate said that he had a r
- Page 99 and 100: 13. Allowing use of premises as dru
- Page 101 and 102: The defendant says he was not there
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 13: Ages of people charged w
- Page 105 and 106: Table 12. Number of charges for var
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 7. Cabramatta 7.1. Introduc
- Page 109 and 110: No. of Drug Premises Figure 14: Num
- Page 111 and 112: Table 13. Information about drug pr
- Page 113 and 114: It should be clear that this legisl
- Page 115 and 116: The unit was in disarray, with spar
- Page 117 and 118: 7.5. Level of drug supply the law i
- Page 119 and 120: 7.5.3 Firearms, weapons and high le
- Page 121 and 122: 7.6. Charges laid under the Drug Pr
- Page 123 and 124: 7.6.4. Young Asian people and drug
- Page 125 and 126: Of these 52 people, 31 people pled
- Page 127 and 128: 7.8. Conclusion: Impact of the Drug
- Page 129 and 130: By way of comment, the continuing a
- Page 131 and 132:
Chapter 8. Targeting drug supply Pa
- Page 133 and 134:
Table 18. Drug Misuse and Trafficki
- Page 135 and 136:
Low level drug suppliers are more l
- Page 137 and 138:
Other forms of organisation in evid
- Page 139 and 140:
Table 19. Drugs Located, State-wide
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 23. Drugs located, Northern R
- Page 143 and 144:
However, the submission concluded b
- Page 145 and 146:
To begin with, telephone intercepts
- Page 147 and 148:
The prohibited drugs that were loca
- Page 149 and 150:
One factor that appears to have per