30.01.2015 Views

Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal

Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal

Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Investment from Other Sources<br />

Besides DDC and VDC, other donor and line agencies including Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Rural Energy Development Programme and<br />

District Education Office have also invested in PAF supported infrastructures schemes. They have invested Rs 159.92 million in cumulative and Rs<br />

90.47 million for infrastructures completed during the reporting <strong>year</strong>. Out of the total investment, 80 per cent has been made in rural energy sector in<br />

cumulative, whereas 95 per cent has been made during the reporting <strong>year</strong>.<br />

Table 10: Investment from different sources in completed schemes<br />

Investment from other sources<br />

SN<br />

Category of Infrastructures<br />

FY 2067/68<br />

Cumulative<br />

Amount (million) % Amount (million) %<br />

1 Rural Access 1.36 2.18 2.61 1.19<br />

2 Community Building 2.76 1.34 6.93 1.9<br />

3 Rural Energy 86.01 34.87 128.22 26.91<br />

4 Small Irrigation 0.265 0.45 8.69 4.29<br />

5 Water Supply & Sanitation 0.07 0.05 13.41 2.64<br />

6 Miscellaneous 0 0 0.06 0.13<br />

Total 90.47 12.03 159.92 8.77<br />

Out of total DDC/VDC investment, in PAF projects—either during the reporting <strong>year</strong> or in cumulative, the highest investment has been made in rural<br />

energy. Rural energy is seconded by community buildings in case of reporting <strong>year</strong> and water supply and sanitation in case of cumulative.<br />

Ratio of investment by different agencies<br />

chart 25: Other’s Investment FY 2067/68<br />

chart 26: Other’s Investment (Cumulative)<br />

0% 0%<br />

0%<br />

2%<br />

3%<br />

0%<br />

2%<br />

4%<br />

Rural Access<br />

Community Building<br />

Rural Energy<br />

Small Irrigation<br />

Water Supply & Sanitation<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

6%<br />

8%<br />

Rural Access<br />

Community Building<br />

Rural Energy<br />

Small Irrigation<br />

Water Supply & Sanitation<br />

Miscellaneous<br />

95%<br />

80%<br />

In cumulative, the table below shows that Local bodies as well as other development agencies are more interested for coordination in rural energy.<br />

They are contributing 8 per cent and 21 per cent of total cost of infrastructure respectively. Contribution from PAF side is highest with 81 per cent for<br />

miscellaneous category of sub-projects- that includes Drainage, improveed cook stove, ICT support , river training and rice mills, among others, and<br />

lowest for rural energy, where PAF’s contribution is only 44 per cent of the total cost. Per centage of Community contribution is highest (27 per cent)<br />

for water supply & sanitation and least (18 per cent) for miscellaneous type sub-projects. In an average, PAF has contributed 64 per cent of total cost ,<br />

whereas CO’s contribution is 24 per cent, DDC and VDC’s contribution is 3 per cent and other’s contribution is 9 per cent.<br />

ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (<strong>2010</strong>/20<strong>11</strong>) 17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!