Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Investment from Other Sources<br />
Besides DDC and VDC, other donor and line agencies including Alternative Energy Promotion Centre, Rural Energy Development Programme and<br />
District Education Office have also invested in PAF supported infrastructures schemes. They have invested Rs 159.92 million in cumulative and Rs<br />
90.47 million for infrastructures completed during the reporting <strong>year</strong>. Out of the total investment, 80 per cent has been made in rural energy sector in<br />
cumulative, whereas 95 per cent has been made during the reporting <strong>year</strong>.<br />
Table 10: Investment from different sources in completed schemes<br />
Investment from other sources<br />
SN<br />
Category of Infrastructures<br />
FY 2067/68<br />
Cumulative<br />
Amount (million) % Amount (million) %<br />
1 Rural Access 1.36 2.18 2.61 1.19<br />
2 Community Building 2.76 1.34 6.93 1.9<br />
3 Rural Energy 86.01 34.87 128.22 26.91<br />
4 Small Irrigation 0.265 0.45 8.69 4.29<br />
5 Water Supply & Sanitation 0.07 0.05 13.41 2.64<br />
6 Miscellaneous 0 0 0.06 0.13<br />
Total 90.47 12.03 159.92 8.77<br />
Out of total DDC/VDC investment, in PAF projects—either during the reporting <strong>year</strong> or in cumulative, the highest investment has been made in rural<br />
energy. Rural energy is seconded by community buildings in case of reporting <strong>year</strong> and water supply and sanitation in case of cumulative.<br />
Ratio of investment by different agencies<br />
chart 25: Other’s Investment FY 2067/68<br />
chart 26: Other’s Investment (Cumulative)<br />
0% 0%<br />
0%<br />
2%<br />
3%<br />
0%<br />
2%<br />
4%<br />
Rural Access<br />
Community Building<br />
Rural Energy<br />
Small Irrigation<br />
Water Supply & Sanitation<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
6%<br />
8%<br />
Rural Access<br />
Community Building<br />
Rural Energy<br />
Small Irrigation<br />
Water Supply & Sanitation<br />
Miscellaneous<br />
95%<br />
80%<br />
In cumulative, the table below shows that Local bodies as well as other development agencies are more interested for coordination in rural energy.<br />
They are contributing 8 per cent and 21 per cent of total cost of infrastructure respectively. Contribution from PAF side is highest with 81 per cent for<br />
miscellaneous category of sub-projects- that includes Drainage, improveed cook stove, ICT support , river training and rice mills, among others, and<br />
lowest for rural energy, where PAF’s contribution is only 44 per cent of the total cost. Per centage of Community contribution is highest (27 per cent)<br />
for water supply & sanitation and least (18 per cent) for miscellaneous type sub-projects. In an average, PAF has contributed 64 per cent of total cost ,<br />
whereas CO’s contribution is 24 per cent, DDC and VDC’s contribution is 3 per cent and other’s contribution is 9 per cent.<br />
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (<strong>2010</strong>/20<strong>11</strong>) 17