Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
Fiscal year 2010/11 - Poverty Alleviation Fund, Nepal
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Annex 14<br />
PAF Result Matrix<br />
NEPAL: <strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>Alleviation</strong> <strong>Fund</strong><br />
<strong>Nepal</strong> – PAF II Project<br />
RESULTS FRAMEWORK<br />
As of 16 July 16, 20<strong>11</strong><br />
Impact: Reduced poverty through improved living conditions of poor<br />
Objective Summary Performance Indicators<br />
Means of Verification/Source of<br />
Information<br />
Progress<br />
PAF II (100M) Cumulative<br />
Project level: OUTCOMES<br />
1. Livelihood Improved P1.1.Increased by 30% poor<br />
households with access to<br />
improved infrastructure facilities at<br />
End-of-Project (EOP).<br />
P1.1 Report available from Infra<br />
division<br />
No. of households: 69,374 HHs<br />
IG+INFRA: 3,575<br />
No. of households: 69,374 HHs<br />
IG+INFRA: 3,575<br />
P1.2 No. of improved community<br />
water points constructed or<br />
rehabilitated under the project<br />
P1.2 Report available from Infra<br />
division<br />
Total: 2139 Total: 3,603<br />
P1.3. 25% of poor households<br />
with minimum of 15% increased<br />
incomes through project activities<br />
by EOP.<br />
P1.2.1 Follow-up baseline survey<br />
of PAF<br />
Per centage of HHs: 66% [Based on the Beneficiary assessment<br />
of sample households in <strong>year</strong> <strong>2010</strong>, who have received PAF<br />
support at least 3 <strong>year</strong>s or more. A new beneficiary assessment is<br />
under preparation.] The Follow up survey <strong>2010</strong> shows: Per capita<br />
consumption of money reciepient CO members increased by 28%<br />
( in real term) and the money received at least six or more months<br />
increased by 49%<br />
2. 2. Empowered women<br />
and targeted groups’<br />
members<br />
P2.1 30 % of key positions in<br />
Project Community Organizations<br />
(COs) filled by women and persons<br />
from the targeted households<br />
P2.1 Status report of CO with<br />
disaggregated data<br />
Women: 65%<br />
Dalit and Janajati: 57%<br />
Total: 35,810<br />
Women: 63%<br />
Dalit and Janajati: 62%<br />
Total: 50,129<br />
P2.2. 25% of COs lead<br />
(Chairperson) by women and the<br />
targeted HHs<br />
P2.2 CO status report with<br />
disaggregated data<br />
Women: 7,0<strong>11</strong> (56%)<br />
Dalit and Janajati: 7,454 (60%)<br />
Total: 12,438<br />
Women: 9,310 (53%)<br />
Dalit and Janajati: <strong>11</strong>,416<br />
(65%)<br />
Total: 17,514<br />
P2.3. 30% of members of Project<br />
community organization from<br />
targeted households<br />
P2.3 CO status report Dalit and Janajati: 52%<br />
Total: 310,143<br />
Dalit and Janajati: 58%<br />
Total: 470,021<br />
INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INDICATORS<br />
COMPONENT 1: Infrastructure Development<br />
Remarks<br />
“Poor Households” means those families with<br />
less than one <strong>year</strong>’s supply of (staple) food and/or<br />
categorized by PAF ‘A’, ‘B’ & ‘C’.<br />
“Non-poor HHs” means other HHs that live in the<br />
vicinity of poor HHs having access to the same<br />
facilities and/or categorized by PAF ‘D’.<br />
“Access” means having possible use of facilities.<br />
“Improved facilities” means community<br />
infrastructure facilities which have been improved<br />
by the Project.<br />
“incomes” means total household cash incomes<br />
“Targeted households (HHs)” are: Dalit and<br />
Janajati, within the Poor Households.<br />
“Key positions “ means Chairperson, Secretary and<br />
Treasurer of the Community Organizations<br />
“Project COs” means the groups formed under the<br />
Project.<br />
58 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT (<strong>2010</strong>/20<strong>11</strong>)