27.02.2015 Views

FINAL REPORT Evaluation of Seawater Desalination Projects ...

FINAL REPORT Evaluation of Seawater Desalination Projects ...

FINAL REPORT Evaluation of Seawater Desalination Projects ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EVALUATION OF SEAWATER DESALINATION PROJECTS<br />

PROPOSED FOR THE MONTEREY PENINSULA<br />

2.4 <strong>Seawater</strong> <strong>Desalination</strong> Vessel (Water Standard Company)<br />

Project name:<br />

Proponent(s):<br />

Location:<br />

Purpose:<br />

<strong>Seawater</strong> <strong>Desalination</strong> Vessel<br />

Water Standard Company<br />

The seawater desalination vessel would be anchored in Monterey Bay,<br />

likely less than five miles from shore. <strong>Seawater</strong> would be treated on<br />

the vessel and delivered to CAW, and potentially to other customers as<br />

well. Brine disposal would be made at the vessel.<br />

To provide water to satisfy a range <strong>of</strong> potable water demands in the<br />

Monterey Peninsula area and Northern Monterey County.<br />

Production volume:<br />

10 to 20 mgd (11,200 to 22,400 ac-ft per year) up to 85,000 ac-ft per<br />

year<br />

Key features: 1. Micr<strong>of</strong>iltration pretreatment system that is planned to extend RO<br />

membrane life<br />

2. Potential use <strong>of</strong> biodiesel<br />

3. Ship-based<br />

4. Multiple depth intake system<br />

5. <strong>Desalination</strong> facility<br />

6. Post treatment facility<br />

7. Gas turbines with steam cogeneration capability and catalytic<br />

emissions treatment<br />

8. Brine discharge is diluted and made at water surface<br />

9. Treated water transmitted by barges or seabed pipeline<br />

Key Information provided to 1. Proponent’s statement and supporting material<br />

review team:<br />

2. Proponent’s presentation to Metropolitan Water District <strong>of</strong><br />

Southern California<br />

3. Proponent’s comments on GEI/B-E draft report and supporting<br />

materials<br />

Persons interviewed: 1. Skip Griffin, PBS&J<br />

2. Andrew Gordon, Water Standard Company<br />

3. Amanda Brock, Water Standard Company<br />

4. Paul Michel, Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary<br />

5. Charles Lester, California Coastal Commission<br />

6. Marsha McNutt, Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute<br />

7. Mike Robinson, V-Ships<br />

Figure 5 shows the potential location <strong>of</strong> the SDV and shore-based facilities. The final<br />

location for anchoring the vessel and the route for the treated-water seabed pipeline have not<br />

been determined.<br />

Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 2-9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!