12.03.2015 Views

PEST RISK ANALYSIS (PRA) TRAINING Group Exercises Manual

PEST RISK ANALYSIS (PRA) TRAINING Group Exercises Manual

PEST RISK ANALYSIS (PRA) TRAINING Group Exercises Manual

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

APPENDIX 8<br />

<strong>PEST</strong> <strong>RISK</strong> <strong>ANALYSIS</strong> <strong>TRAINING</strong> - GROUP EXERCISES MANUAL<br />

Grove et al.: Thrips species associated with mango trees in South Africa 157<br />

Table 2. Thrips species collected at weekly intervals from mango flowers in a open-pollinated seedling orchard at<br />

Nelspruit.<br />

Date<br />

Status of flowers/fruit<br />

Species (number collected)<br />

1995-08-14 H. gowdeyi (2). Haplothrips sp. (2), S. aurantii (24), larvae (3)<br />

All flowers on panicle closed<br />

1995-08-2 1 H. gowdeyi (14), S. aurantii (1), larvae (1)<br />

15 % of flowers on panicle open<br />

1995-08-28 H. clarisetis (10), F schultzei (6), S. aurantii (14), T. tenellus (5)<br />

85 % of flowers on panicle open larvae (2)<br />

1995-09-04 H. gowdeyi (2), S. aurantii (14), T. tenellus (4)<br />

100 % of flowers on panicle open<br />

1995-09-11 S. aurantii (10), T. tenellus (8), larvae (15)<br />

Small fruit setting<br />

1995-09-18 H. bedfordi (2), H. gowdeyi (2), S. aurantii (14), T. tenellus (4)<br />

Average fruit length 3 mm<br />

1995-09-26 S. aurantii (18), larvae (3)<br />

Average fruit length 9 mm<br />

1995-10-02 S. aurantii (34), larvae (12)<br />

Average fruit length 12 mm<br />

1995-10-09 S. aurantii (20), larvae (16)<br />

Average fruit length 22 mm<br />

1995-10-16 S. aurantii (1)<br />

Average fruit length 39 mm<br />

1995-10-23 S. aurantii (1), larvae (1)<br />

Average fruit length 58 mm<br />

1995-10-30 -<br />

Average fruit length 58 mm<br />

1995-11-06 -<br />

Average fruit length 71 mm<br />

Fungal diseases are present on mangoes in South<br />

Africa (Manicom 1998), but thrips are not<br />

considered to be particularly important as vectors<br />

of pathogens relative to dissemination occurring<br />

by wind and rain (Ullman et al. 1997)<br />

Monitoring thrips in the flowers and on young<br />

fruit<br />

Scirtothrips aurantii was the most abundant<br />

species found in the flowers and on young fruit in<br />

the open-pollinated seedling orchard at Nelspruit<br />

(Table 2). Haplothrips gowdeyi and T. tenellus<br />

were also found in high numbers during the<br />

flowering period. Scirtothrips aurantii was the<br />

only species found on the fruit as it developed<br />

beyond 9 mm. This was the only orchard where S.<br />

aurantii was found in such high numbers in the<br />

flowers. The orchard consisted of different<br />

selected seedlings and the population probably<br />

built up on the fruit and flowers of the early<br />

selections. By the time that most trees started to<br />

flower, S. aurantii was already present in high<br />

numbers. Therefore S. aurantii can be present in<br />

high numbers in the flowers, although numbers<br />

usually build upon small fruit.<br />

In contrast to the Nelspruit orchard, T. acaciae<br />

was the most abundant species in the Zill and<br />

Sensation orchard at the ITSC Friedenheim<br />

Experimental Farm during 1996 (Tables 3, 4),<br />

while S. aurantii was absent. Thrips tenellus was<br />

also present in fairly high numbers in the Zill and<br />

Sensation orchard at Friedenheim.<br />

Monitoring thrips with yellow card traps<br />

Yellow sticky card traps were an effective<br />

method for monitoring thrips species and<br />

numbers. The traps were easy to use and handle.<br />

The thrips trapped were mainly S. aurantii and T.<br />

tenellus, while other species with very low<br />

abundance were omitted. Thrips acaciae was<br />

abundant at Friedenheim during 1996 and was<br />

thus included. The abundance of T. tenellus and S.<br />

aurantii in the Sensation orchard at Nelspruit<br />

during 1992/93 is illustrated in Fig. 1. The<br />

numbers of T. tenellus were high during the<br />

flowering period, but declined<br />

84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!