19.03.2015 Views

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

intercourse. Pooled odds ratio 0.99 (95% CI 0.84<br />

to 1.16).<br />

2) Use of birth control<br />

Every time <strong>the</strong>y had intercourse (Fig 2)<br />

Young women: 8 studies of 1967 women<br />

showed no improvement in use of birth control<br />

at every intercourse (0.95; 0.69 to 1.30). There<br />

was significant heterogeneity among studies<br />

(p=0.08). Unexplained heterogeneity.<br />

Young men: 3 studies of 1505 young men<br />

indicated that <strong>the</strong> programmes did not improve<br />

<strong>the</strong> use of birth control at every intercourse<br />

(0.90;0.70 to 1.16). Heterogeneous studies.<br />

Use of birth control last time <strong>the</strong>y had<br />

intercourse (Fig 3)<br />

Young women: 5 studies of 799 young women<br />

showed no improvement (1.05;0.5 to 2.19) with<br />

significant heterogeneity, p=0.007).<br />

Heterogeneity not explained by hypo<strong>the</strong>ses.<br />

Young men: 4 studies of 1262 young men<br />

showed no improvement (1.25;0.99 to 1.59), no<br />

heterogeneity.<br />

3) Pregnancy<br />

Young women: 12 studies of 8019 young women<br />

showed that <strong>the</strong> interventions did not reduce<br />

pregnancy rates (1.04;0.78 to 1.4), no<br />

heterogeneity.<br />

Young men – pregnancies with partners – 5<br />

studies of 3759 young men showed no effect of<br />

interventions on reducing pregnancies among<br />

partners of young men, (1.54;1.03 to 2.29), no<br />

heterogeneity.<br />

7. Could <strong>the</strong>se results be due to chance?<br />

HINT: Look for tests of statistical significance eg. p<br />

values and confidence intervals (CIs)<br />

8. Can <strong>the</strong> results be applied to <strong>the</strong> local<br />

population?<br />

HINT: Consider whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

- <strong>the</strong> population sample covered by <strong>the</strong><br />

review could be sufficiently different to your<br />

population to cause concern.<br />

– your local setting is likely to differ much<br />

from that of <strong>the</strong> review<br />

Most results are not significant. The only<br />

significant difference was for pregnancies in<br />

partners of young men, CI (1.54;1.03 to 2.29).<br />

Confidence interval does not include one, <strong>the</strong><br />

null hypo<strong>the</strong>sis.<br />

Most of <strong>the</strong> participants in over half of <strong>the</strong><br />

studies were African-American or Hispanic,<br />

thus over-representing low socioeconomic<br />

groups.<br />

Interventions may be more successful in o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

populations.<br />

In all but 5 studies, participants received<br />

conventional sex education in <strong>the</strong> control group.<br />

It is possible that <strong>the</strong>se interventions had some<br />

effect, and tested interventions were not potent<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!