Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group
Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group
Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Emphasise that <strong>the</strong> criteria to appraise studies may not be suitable for every health promotion or<br />
public health intervention. For example, blinding in educational interventions is difficult and <strong>the</strong><br />
potential for contamination is high. Therefore, for such interventions to score highly on a quality<br />
checklist, aspects such as blinding need to be given less weight than aspects such as data collection<br />
methods and comparability of groups at baseline.<br />
Integrity of intervention: Many studies may lack adequate reporting of factors describing integrity.<br />
Information on cluster designs and cluster analysis issues: It is highly recommended to read <strong>the</strong><br />
executive summary of “Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG. Methods<br />
for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a<br />
systematic review. <strong>Health</strong> Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92.”. This can be found at <strong>the</strong> following<br />
website http://www.ncchta.org/ProjectData/3_publication_listings_ALL.asp.<br />
Crib sheets for <strong>the</strong> appraisal exercises are attached. The checklist for <strong>the</strong> randomised controlled trial<br />
and <strong>the</strong> controlled before and after study is <strong>the</strong> Effective <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Practice Project (EPHPP)<br />
quality appraisal tool for quantitative studies. The EPHPP checklist was chosen as it was one of <strong>the</strong><br />
six checklists recommended by an HTA report by Deeks et al (2003) for assessing quality when<br />
conducting a systematic review. This checklist is <strong>the</strong> only one of <strong>the</strong> six to ask reviewers to<br />
determine <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> intervention. It also has <strong>the</strong> advantage of being able to be used for a<br />
variety of study designs.<br />
The aim of <strong>the</strong> exercise is for participants to become familiar with <strong>the</strong> checklists provided. Do not<br />
let participants get swayed into conversations that do not relate directly to <strong>the</strong> task at hand. It is<br />
more important that participants complete <strong>the</strong> checklist than get caught up on one particular<br />
question.<br />
** Feel free to choose critical appraisal studies which are more relevant to your audience.<br />
92