19.03.2015 Views

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

Train the Trainer Course book - Cochrane Public Health Group

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Emphasise that <strong>the</strong> criteria to appraise studies may not be suitable for every health promotion or<br />

public health intervention. For example, blinding in educational interventions is difficult and <strong>the</strong><br />

potential for contamination is high. Therefore, for such interventions to score highly on a quality<br />

checklist, aspects such as blinding need to be given less weight than aspects such as data collection<br />

methods and comparability of groups at baseline.<br />

Integrity of intervention: Many studies may lack adequate reporting of factors describing integrity.<br />

Information on cluster designs and cluster analysis issues: It is highly recommended to read <strong>the</strong><br />

executive summary of “Ukoumunne OC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S, Sterne JA, Burney PG. Methods<br />

for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a<br />

systematic review. <strong>Health</strong> Technol Assess. 1999;3(5):iii-92.”. This can be found at <strong>the</strong> following<br />

website http://www.ncchta.org/ProjectData/3_publication_listings_ALL.asp.<br />

Crib sheets for <strong>the</strong> appraisal exercises are attached. The checklist for <strong>the</strong> randomised controlled trial<br />

and <strong>the</strong> controlled before and after study is <strong>the</strong> Effective <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Health</strong> Practice Project (EPHPP)<br />

quality appraisal tool for quantitative studies. The EPHPP checklist was chosen as it was one of <strong>the</strong><br />

six checklists recommended by an HTA report by Deeks et al (2003) for assessing quality when<br />

conducting a systematic review. This checklist is <strong>the</strong> only one of <strong>the</strong> six to ask reviewers to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> integrity of <strong>the</strong> intervention. It also has <strong>the</strong> advantage of being able to be used for a<br />

variety of study designs.<br />

The aim of <strong>the</strong> exercise is for participants to become familiar with <strong>the</strong> checklists provided. Do not<br />

let participants get swayed into conversations that do not relate directly to <strong>the</strong> task at hand. It is<br />

more important that participants complete <strong>the</strong> checklist than get caught up on one particular<br />

question.<br />

** Feel free to choose critical appraisal studies which are more relevant to your audience.<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!