- Page 1 and 2:
TRAIN-THE-TRAINER HANDBOOOK Two-day
- Page 3:
Contents Introduction .............
- Page 6 and 7:
Additional reading: Textbooks: Oliv
- Page 8 and 9:
2) ONCE REGISTRATIONS HAVE BEEN REC
- Page 11:
OUTLINE OF TWO-DAY WORKSHOP 9:00am
- Page 15 and 16:
Unit One: Background to Systematic
- Page 17 and 18:
Reviews of clinical interventions v
- Page 19 and 20:
FACILITATOR’S GUIDE Time required
- Page 21 and 22:
Unit Two: International Systematic
- Page 23 and 24:
FACILITATOR’S GUIDE Time required
- Page 25 and 26:
Unit Three: Resources Required Lear
- Page 27:
Formulate review question Establish
- Page 31 and 32:
Unit Four: Developing a Protocol Le
- Page 33 and 34:
Establish an Advisory Group whose m
- Page 35 and 36:
FACILITATOR’S GUIDE Time required
- Page 37 and 38:
Unit Five: Asking an Answerable Que
- Page 39 and 40:
To investigate both the implementat
- Page 41 and 42:
Process evaluations: these studies
- Page 43 and 44:
REFERENCES 1. Oliver S. 1997. Explo
- Page 45 and 46:
FACILATOR’S GUIDE Time required:
- Page 47 and 48:
Unit Six: Finding The Evidence Lear
- Page 49 and 50:
CA38392 (NCI) Language English Entr
- Page 51 and 52:
Where to locate studies a) Electron
- Page 53 and 54:
ADDITIONAL READING Harden A, Peersm
- Page 55 and 56:
45. "Diet-Fat-Restricted"/ all subh
- Page 57 and 58:
Brunton G, Harden A, Rees R, Kavana
- Page 59 and 60:
1. Start with the primary concept,
- Page 61 and 62:
5. Because adolescent has no narrow
- Page 63:
12. Complete searches 8-12 and 13-2
- Page 67 and 68:
Unit Seven: Data Abstraction Learni
- Page 69:
FACILITATOR’S GUIDE Time required
- Page 72 and 73:
Introduction of bias into the condu
- Page 74 and 75:
population on gender, age, or educa
- Page 76 and 77:
5) Data collection methods As highl
- Page 78 and 79:
These data provide important inform
- Page 80 and 81:
11. Green J, Tones K. Towards a sec
- Page 83 and 84:
QUALITY ASSESSMENT TOOL FOR QUANTIT
- Page 85 and 86:
G) ANALYSIS (Q1) Is there a sample
- Page 87 and 88:
DICTIONARY for the Effective Public
- Page 89 and 90:
(i) (ii) If the study was reported
- Page 91 and 92:
F) WITHDRAWALS AND DROP-OUTS Q1 Ind
- Page 93:
C) CONFOUNDERS Strong Moderate Weak
- Page 96 and 97: Emphasise that the criteria to appr
- Page 98 and 99: Randomised controlled trial - criti
- Page 100 and 101: calculation? Yes Partially No (Q2)
- Page 102 and 103: Controlled before and after study -
- Page 104 and 105: RATE THIS SECTION Strong Moderate W
- Page 106 and 107: 102
- Page 108 and 109: Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative Researc
- Page 110 and 111: Screening Questions 1 Was there a c
- Page 112 and 113: ……………………………
- Page 114 and 115: 110
- Page 116 and 117: A Checklist for Evaluating Evidence
- Page 118 and 119: 114
- Page 120 and 121: Where studies are more homogenous,
- Page 122 and 123: 118
- Page 124 and 125: 120
- Page 126 and 127: esulting from some community interv
- Page 128 and 129: Reviewers should use the RE-AIM mod
- Page 130 and 131: Economic efficiency Harms Economic
- Page 132 and 133: 9. Swerrissen H, Crisp BR. The sust
- Page 134 and 135: Exercise: Allow participants 20 min
- Page 136 and 137: who had participated in their smoki
- Page 138 and 139: Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
- Page 140 and 141: ……………………………
- Page 142 and 143: 2 points out of the possible 4 poin
- Page 144 and 145: - search for non-English language s