15.04.2015 Views

Full Report

Full Report

Full Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Discussion and<br />

Recommendations<br />

This section presents and examines recommendations for the CDM project in relation<br />

to the four key elements within the health system component of the expanded<br />

chronic care model (ECCM): self management, health system design, decision support<br />

and information systems. Each section explores the value of the ECCM element and<br />

proposes conditions for its spread and scale throughout NWT. Value, however, is not<br />

addressed with respect to financial efficiencies – the relationship between costs<br />

incurred and outcomes achieved. Although efficiency is a prime concern for decisionand<br />

policy-makers, there are several reasons to be cautious about its estimation in<br />

the early experimentation of improvement projects.<br />

First, efficiency must be assessed on the basis<br />

of validated outcomes. This assessment is difficult in<br />

the early phases of experimentation, since outcomes<br />

often take time to produce. The three NWT pilot<br />

projects have made some progress towards improved<br />

outcomes, but it is much too early to speculate about<br />

the impact that may result if the projects were implemented<br />

on a wider scale. As the pilot summaries will<br />

show, the IPs also resulted in a number of unexpected<br />

and unintended impacts as they were implemented.<br />

Second, analysis of efficiency requires estimates of<br />

costs; yet the costs that are of ultimate interest are<br />

not those incurred in the pilot projects, but costs<br />

that would be incurred if projects were scaled up.<br />

Pilot-project costs are often skewed by intrinsic<br />

inefficiencies, such as the learning curve associated<br />

with training of staff and adoption of tools in the CDM<br />

pilots. As the pilots are scaled and spread, integrating<br />

the lessons learned about these inefficiencies will<br />

help to increase the effectiveness and sustainability<br />

of an integrated territorial CDM strategy.<br />

Exploring cross-case benefits<br />

Given the ultimate goal of an integrated chronic<br />

disease strategy, the ECCM elements should be<br />

assessed collectively and comparatively for their<br />

relevance to all chronic diseases. For example, self<br />

management was examined in the context of diabetes,<br />

but offers immense potential in the treatment<br />

of other diseases. The renal IP dealt with information<br />

systems and decision support, which promise vast<br />

improvements in virtually every aspect of healthcare.<br />

Standardized clinical referral and information sharing<br />

pathways were assessed within the mental health IP,<br />

yet the benefits of these tools could improve many<br />

other aspects of chronic care.<br />

Each IP was carefully structured to optimize project<br />

benefits system-wide. The Department considers<br />

this cross-case approach essential to design a truly<br />

integrated CDM strategy.<br />

11<br />

Making the Case for Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!