15.04.2015 Views

Full Report

Full Report

Full Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MENTAL<br />

HEALTH<br />

Improving inter-branch<br />

communication<br />

According to staff, the project has improved<br />

communication between health and social<br />

services. Historically, the independence<br />

of these branches has impeded the flow<br />

of clients information between them. One<br />

interviewee indicated that it “seems like<br />

there is a Grand Canyon… between mental<br />

health and the health centre.”<br />

Use of the referral pathways, however,<br />

appears to be breaking down barriers and<br />

enabling staff throughout the system to<br />

collaborate effectively in referring and<br />

monitoring the progress of clients. 110 Staff<br />

noted improved relationships between<br />

providers, better handoff of clients through<br />

the use of the referral pathways and an<br />

increase in the use of case management<br />

practices. 111 These changes are indicative of<br />

future support for more case management<br />

among health and social service staff. Case<br />

management has also been identified in<br />

the NWT Action Plan, which states that the<br />

Department will work with other government<br />

departments to formalize practices and<br />

improve both accessibility to the system<br />

and appropriateness of services.<br />

What we found<br />

As the CDM pilot projects strive to improve care<br />

across NWT, they are not without their own<br />

limitations. As already noted, Fort Simpson saw<br />

interactions with only two clients who came from<br />

the outlying cabin communities; Fort Good Hope<br />

received no clients. Both communities are small,<br />

suggesting larger pilot sites with a greater ability<br />

to draw on client populations may have offered the<br />

potential for a more meaningful experience with<br />

the new process and tools.<br />

This scarcity of clients makes it difficult to discern<br />

the impact the project may have had on client<br />

care. Of interest, a post-pilot survey by staff noted<br />

an increase in quality care across the system as a<br />

result of the pilot projects. 108 The Department feels<br />

it is prudent to interpret this and similar opinions as<br />

expectations for future improvement that may flow<br />

from project work – and also as a measure of staff’s<br />

belief in the potential for the standardization work<br />

at the project’s core.<br />

Despite these particular limitations, the pilot sites<br />

reported a variety of professional and organizational<br />

improvements. As the survey reflected, staff are convinced<br />

of the benefit of standardized pathways for<br />

referring mental health clients. Staff also found value in<br />

the information sharing tools, such as the checklists for<br />

referral, as well as the pathways for referral to inpatient<br />

and outpatient psychiatry. All staff surveyed after the<br />

piloting phase recommended the continued use and<br />

spread of the toolkit beyond the pilot sites. 109<br />

Spreading the benefits<br />

At STHA, the inpatient psychiatry unit for the entire<br />

territory, staff adapted the pilot project’s referral<br />

checklist for use in all communities. Since the project<br />

ended, STHA has sent a number of discharge plans<br />

to clients’ home communities – clear evidence of<br />

improved communication, acceptance of the process<br />

and pathways, and spread of the practice beyond<br />

the pilot sites. 112<br />

49<br />

Making the Case for Change

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!