14.06.2015 Views

Addressing the harmful use of alcohol - WHO Western Pacific Region

Addressing the harmful use of alcohol - WHO Western Pacific Region

Addressing the harmful use of alcohol - WHO Western Pacific Region

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.<br />

Reducing affordability<br />

Rationale<br />

The price <strong>of</strong> <strong>alcohol</strong> is a key factor influencing levels <strong>of</strong> consumption and subsequent<br />

<strong>alcohol</strong>-related harm. There is considerable evidence that low <strong>alcohol</strong> prices encourage<br />

higher consumption, including heavier drinking per occasion and underage drinking, leading<br />

to increased <strong>alcohol</strong>-related harm. When prices rise, <strong>the</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>alcohol</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r drugs<br />

decreases, and vice versa (Babor et al. 2010).<br />

National statistics over recent decades reveal a strong relationship between increased <strong>alcohol</strong><br />

affordability – that is, price relative to income – and patterns <strong>of</strong> consumption, including<br />

increased underage drinking (Academy <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences 2004; Scottish Government 2008;<br />

Wall 2009).<br />

Young people and heavy drinkers are particularly sensitive to <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>alcohol</strong> (Chaloupka<br />

et al. 2002; Chaloupka and Wechsler 1997). There is also evidence that <strong>the</strong> heaviest drinkers<br />

seek out cheaper drinks, giving <strong>the</strong>m a unit <strong>of</strong> <strong>alcohol</strong> at a lower cost than <strong>the</strong> drinks more<br />

moderate drinkers buy. This means that population-based policies to influence price are also<br />

effective for targeting <strong>the</strong> groups that drink most heavily.<br />

Both <strong>alcohol</strong> taxes and minimum pricing strategies have a broad reach and are relatively low<br />

cost to implement or streng<strong>the</strong>n, so <strong>the</strong> impact to be expected from <strong>the</strong>se policies is high<br />

relative to o<strong>the</strong>r policies. 1 Regulation or taxes that differentially affect lower-priced drinks may<br />

be more effective at reducing heavy drinking and harm (Babor et al. 2010).<br />

The policies and legislative examples addressed in this section are:<br />

• <strong>alcohol</strong> taxation affecting price;<br />

• dedicated funding from <strong>alcohol</strong> taxes; and<br />

• minimum pricing.<br />

1 Note, taxes have <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> raising revenue for government health promotion programmes, which is<br />

not <strong>the</strong> case for minimum price schemes where price increases are retained by industry.<br />

10 Return to TOC

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!