09.07.2015 Views

Proceedings of the meeting - Department of Physics - University of ...

Proceedings of the meeting - Department of Physics - University of ...

Proceedings of the meeting - Department of Physics - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Faster Dixon Fat-Water Imaging With Slice Multiplexed PulsesO1Kuan J LeeAcademic Radiology, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Sheffield, Sheffield, UKIntroductionPhase sensitive imaging for fat-water separation was first proposed byDixon (1): for each slice, two images are acquired, one with fat andwater “in-phase”, and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r π “out-<strong>of</strong>-phase”. However, <strong>the</strong>original method could fail if <strong>the</strong>re were significant fieldinhomogeneities which introduced additional phase shifts. Toovercome this, Glover (2) suggested acquiring an additional 2π image.Unfortunately this leads to a threefold increase in minimum imagingtime.Recently we introduced a new method for multislice imaging using<strong>the</strong> “multiplex pulse” (3). The multiplex pulse combines severalcomponent pulses into a single pulse which has <strong>the</strong> duration <strong>of</strong> asingle component pulse. Each component pulse simultaneously selectsa different slice which is rephased with a different slice gradientrefocusing lobe, <strong>the</strong>reby avoiding aliasing. The aim <strong>of</strong> this work is toshow that multiplex pulses can be used to speed up Dixon fat-waterimaging.MethodsA 4 ms three-slice multiplex pulse (Fig 1), <strong>the</strong> slices <strong>of</strong> which arerephased by +0.15, -0.5 and -0.85 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> slice select lobe, wasdesigned as described in Ref (4). This was used in a spin-echosequence with a non-slice selective refocusing pulse; <strong>the</strong> schematic(not to scale) is shown in Fig 2. First, images were collected atvarying TE with fat and water phantoms in order to determine <strong>the</strong> inphaseecho time for each slice. Relative to <strong>the</strong> 0.5-rephased slice, <strong>the</strong>0.15 pulse’s slice was measured to be in phase 3.1 ms earlier and <strong>the</strong>0.85 pulse’s slice was in phase 1.9 ms later (data not shown). Thetiming <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> readout gradients was adjusted to take this into accounti.e. all echoes to have <strong>the</strong> same relative fat-water shift.RF/SignalSSPEFEwas a non-minimum power delayed focus DBURP1 pulse). This delayis actually helpful because <strong>the</strong> time interval can be used to switch <strong>the</strong>read gradient. Interestingly, it indicates that <strong>the</strong> relative in-phase echotimes may be adjusted e.g. simply by shortening or leng<strong>the</strong>ning <strong>the</strong>existing pulse. This may be useful when adapting a sequence for useon scanners <strong>of</strong> different field strengths. Adjustment will also benecessary for o<strong>the</strong>r variants <strong>of</strong> Dixon imaging requiring different fatwatershifts e.g. <strong>the</strong> IDEAL method (-π/6, π/2, 7π/6) (5), or <strong>the</strong> twopoint POP (0, 135°) (6).The pro<strong>of</strong>-<strong>of</strong>-principle sequence presented here uses one non-sliceselective refocusing pulse. The next step will be to implementmultiplex fat-water imaging with FSE sequences. The sequence willbe similar to GRASE (7), where extra gradient echoes are collected inbetween refocusing pulses. However, with multiplex pulses, <strong>the</strong> extragradient echoes correspond to extra slices, instead <strong>of</strong> extra k-spacelines within <strong>the</strong> same slice.It is hoped also to implement this method for fat suppression at lowfields (

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!