While EIAs are mandatory for development projects under four laws that govern biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> in Sri Lanka,these EIAs do not give adequate attenti<strong>on</strong> to requirements of all aspects of biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>. Furthermore, thein-country capacity for carrying out Biodiversity Impact Assessments (BIAs) is limited. However, the nati<strong>on</strong>al BCAP hasidentified as an indicator of BCAP implementati<strong>on</strong>, the presence of well formulated effective legislati<strong>on</strong> forincorporating of EIA procedures for recognising biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns.Overall deficiencies in the EIA process in Sri Lanka have been identified as:• Absence of a biodiversity database in a central instituti<strong>on</strong>/s to refer during the EIA process to discern baseline scenario to inferpossible loss of biodiversity in an area earmarked to undergo development• Few instituti<strong>on</strong>s/NGOs/trained individuals in Sr Lanka are capable of a valid EIAs. Hence the CEA or PAAs have a very limited groupof experts (less than 25) to carry out EIA or evaluate an EIAs.• Biodiversity Impact Assessments (BIAs) are not mandatory in any of the current EIA procedures. There are very few trained peoplein the country to carry out BIAs even if they became mandatory.Source: NCSA Thematic Assessment Report <strong>on</strong> Biodiversity, 20073.4 Overview of mainstreaming biodiversity into cross-sectoralstrategies and plansSeveral positive steps have been taken since 1990 to further biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> in Sri Lanka. They are thecreati<strong>on</strong> of the Ministry of Envir<strong>on</strong>ment (MoENR) and the establishment of a Biodiversity Secretariat/Divisi<strong>on</strong> in theMinistry. This divisi<strong>on</strong> is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for formulati<strong>on</strong> and coordinati<strong>on</strong> of all policy matters relating to biodiversityc<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>, and preparati<strong>on</strong> of the nati<strong>on</strong>al Biodiversity C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Acti<strong>on</strong> Plan (BCAP) in 1999, and an Addendumto this in 2007. Both documents give specific recommendati<strong>on</strong>s that are adequate to c<strong>on</strong>serve and sustainably manageSri Lanka’s biodiversity. The BCAP promotes integrati<strong>on</strong> of biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns into sectoral and cross-sectoral plansand programmes. However, such integrati<strong>on</strong> has been less than anticipated. This is mainly due to the lack of afuncti<strong>on</strong>ing mechanism for implementing the BCAP in a holistic manner that will enable coordinati<strong>on</strong> of activitiesrelated to c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and management of biodiversity in the public and private sectors.Even so, str<strong>on</strong>g attenti<strong>on</strong> is given to biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns within the envir<strong>on</strong>mental sector covering the forestry andwildlife, wetlands, and coastal and marine systems. Other envir<strong>on</strong>ment related sectors that depend <strong>on</strong> bio-resourcessuch as agriculture and fisheries sectors (with the excepti<strong>on</strong> of the livestock development sector) have also includedbiodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and use into their policies, plans and programmes, but this is due to the efforts of theagricultural sector and individual instituti<strong>on</strong>al efforts. In c<strong>on</strong>trast, integrati<strong>on</strong> of biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> into thedevelopment sector ( including the service sector, such as road development, telecommunicati<strong>on</strong>s) and the business(industrial) sector has been inadequate.A detailed situati<strong>on</strong> analysis carried out during the GEF funded Nati<strong>on</strong>al Capacity Needs Self Assessment (2005-2006)clearly showed that in-country capacity should be strengthened to: (a) integrate c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and sustainable use ofbiological diversity into sectoral and cross-sectoral (i.e. especially those of the development sector) plans,programmes and policies, and (b) prepare and implement biodiversity plans and policies with the required crosssectoralsupport. (MoFE, 2007).3.4.1 Mechanisms for cross-sectoral integrati<strong>on</strong> of biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cernsIn the past, poor co-ordinati<strong>on</strong> characterized envir<strong>on</strong>mental management inSri Lanka, due to the fragmented nature of resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities forenvir<strong>on</strong>mental policy planning, management and implementati<strong>on</strong> resultingfrom the large number of instituti<strong>on</strong>s and agencies involved - at both thenati<strong>on</strong>al and local level- and the plethora of laws that govern them. Thisapplies to the coordinati<strong>on</strong> required to integrate biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns intosectoral and inter-sectoral strategies, plans and programmes. There is arecognized need for formal and functi<strong>on</strong>al mechanisms and regular activitiesto maintain the interests of partner agencies for biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns to beeffectively integrated into sectoral and corporate planning.Baseline survey report. NCSA, 2006The MoENR m<strong>on</strong>itors and coordinates theimplementati<strong>on</strong> of the Nati<strong>on</strong>al Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Acti<strong>on</strong>Plan (NEAP). However, the former Committees <strong>on</strong>Envir<strong>on</strong>ment Policy and Management (CEPOMs) thatwere used for this purpose are n<strong>on</strong>-existent now. Thisis expected to be replaced by a Committee headed bythe President to coordinate sectoral and cross-sectoralenvir<strong>on</strong>mental activities in keeping with the Nati<strong>on</strong>alDevelopment Strategy: Mahinda Chintana: Visi<strong>on</strong> for anew Sri Lanka. This mechanism will be beneficial formainstreaming biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns into the activitiesof development agencies, but this will not precludeFourth Nati<strong>on</strong>al Report to the CBD: Sri Lanka 72
the need for a mechanism to implement the BCAP.The most effective coordinati<strong>on</strong> process to date has been the wide stakeholder discussi<strong>on</strong>s prior to preparati<strong>on</strong> ofpolicies, strategies, management plans or acti<strong>on</strong> plans within the envir<strong>on</strong>mental as well as other related sectors suchas agriculture, fisheries, urban development and coast c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>, for which representatives of the MoENR, ForestDepartment, Department of Wildlife C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> and the Central Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Authority and key envir<strong>on</strong>mentalNGOs are invited. However, the present inter-instituti<strong>on</strong>al coordinati<strong>on</strong> by the BDS and other c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> orientedstate agencies (FD, DWLC, CCD, CEA, etc.) is not sufficiently effective to obtain commitment from other agenciesrequired for policy/plan/programme implementati<strong>on</strong>. Steering Committees set up for major projects involveparticipati<strong>on</strong> of c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> agencies resulting in biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>cerns being addressed in the policies, plans andprogrammes of these sectors at promote addressing biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s. On the other hand such c<strong>on</strong>sultati<strong>on</strong>sare rare with the development agencies or the private sector in general.Proposal for a nati<strong>on</strong>al biodiversity (or envir<strong>on</strong>mental) communicati<strong>on</strong> initiativeBuilding capacity in the BDS/MoENR is required to c<strong>on</strong>duct a well planned communicati<strong>on</strong> initiative, based <strong>on</strong> a well planned CEPAstrategy that targets the critically important instituti<strong>on</strong>s and stakeholder groups having significant impacts <strong>on</strong> biodiversity (includingpolicy makers and planners at the highest level, development sector agencies and the business sector ), to obtain their support forimplementing the BCAP and its Addendum. The initiative should:(a) target high level policy makers, planners and administrators (at central and regi<strong>on</strong>al levels) in selected important developmentsector agencies that impact <strong>on</strong> or rely <strong>on</strong> heavy use of comp<strong>on</strong>ents of biodiversity; and the business sector through customisedactivities, and(b) Build skills for CEPA in state agencies resp<strong>on</strong>sible for biodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> (FD, DWLC, DOA, CCD, DFAR, NZG and NBG)and selected envir<strong>on</strong>mental NGOs for effective biodiversity communicati<strong>on</strong> through training of trainers initiatives and productdevelopment (corporate presentati<strong>on</strong>s, CDs, etc.).(c) Instilling skills in agencies resp<strong>on</strong>sible for in-situ and ex-situ c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> to better market their activities to financial anddevelopment sector organisati<strong>on</strong>s and funding agencies (including building skills for project proposal writing and budget preparati<strong>on</strong>(i.e. to access both nati<strong>on</strong>al and d<strong>on</strong>or funding).Source: the NCSA Thematic Report <strong>on</strong> Biodiversity, 2007.3.5 Integrati<strong>on</strong> with other c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>sSri Lanka’s overall political commitment to biodiversity and envir<strong>on</strong>mental c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> in Sri Lanka are reflected inthe ratificati<strong>on</strong> of 36 Multi-lateral Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Agreements (MEAs), many of which influence biodiversityc<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>. The main c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s in this regard are given in Table 3.8 below. Am<strong>on</strong>g these are four otherbiodiversity-related c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s (i.e. CITES, <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Migratory Species, Ramsar and the World Heritage<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g>), the two other Rio c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s (UNFCCC, UNCCD). A number of activities and programmes have beentaken place to facilitate obligati<strong>on</strong>s under these c<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong>s.Within the MoENR, the Biodiversity Divisi<strong>on</strong> deals specifically with all aspects of policy and plans related to nati<strong>on</strong>albiodiversity c<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong>, and nati<strong>on</strong>al resp<strong>on</strong>ses to obligati<strong>on</strong>s under the <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Diversity</strong> and theCartagena Protocol. This divisi<strong>on</strong> services the United Nati<strong>on</strong>s Framework <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> Climate Change and itsrelated protocols; The Polluti<strong>on</strong> Management and C<strong>on</strong>trol Divisi<strong>on</strong> services the Stockholm <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> PersistentOrganic Pollutants (POPs) and the Basel <str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>venti<strong>on</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> the C<strong>on</strong>trol of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastesand Their Disposal (1989), and deals with policies and strategies to eliminate POPs impacts in the country.Fourth Nati<strong>on</strong>al Report to the CBD: Sri Lanka 73
- Page 1 and 2:
Fourth Country Report from Sri Lank
- Page 3:
Cover photo credits•••• Gra
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 22.1 Introduction ……392
- Page 8:
List of figuresFigure 1.1 Map of Sr
- Page 11 and 12:
Baseline Biodiversity Survey (BBS)
- Page 13 and 14:
through skills building for reporti
- Page 15:
Chapter 11.1 IntroductionThis chapt
- Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1.2: Major climatic zones ba
- Page 21 and 22:
Evolutionary significance of Sri La
- Page 23 and 24:
1.3 Species diversity1.3.1 StatusSr
- Page 25 and 26:
.11 Coastal and marine ecosystemsTA
- Page 27 and 28:
wetland habitats (MALF, 1995; IUCN
- Page 29 and 30: Dry monsoon forests (Figure 1.3) lo
- Page 31 and 32: woody species and faunal diversity
- Page 33 and 34: TABLE 1.7: Trends in detection of i
- Page 35 and 36: Bank, 2008), and are distributed th
- Page 37 and 38: salt marshes occur along the coast
- Page 39 and 40: Sri Lanka also has a range of cerea
- Page 41 and 42: TABLE 1.8: Germplasm Collection Sta
- Page 43 and 44: Soil erosion is extremely high in t
- Page 45 and 46: 1.8.5 Impact of changes in biodiver
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 22.1 IntroductionSri Lanka
- Page 49: • The importance of Communication
- Page 53 and 54: 2.2.5 Institutional arrangements fo
- Page 55 and 56: problem for non-implementation of t
- Page 57 and 58: Key threats Specific issue Statusco
- Page 59 and 60: Key threats Specific issue StatusSp
- Page 61 and 62: TABLE 2.2: Major donor funded proje
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 33.1 IntroductionThe Confer
- Page 65 and 66: Primary Stakeholders*Secondary stak
- Page 67 and 68: laws concerning access to genetic r
- Page 69 and 70: TABLE 3.3: Integration of biodivers
- Page 71 and 72: Area of purviewPolicies / plans/ la
- Page 73 and 74: Overall, biodiversity consideration
- Page 75 and 76: SectorInstitutions, mandates and na
- Page 77 and 78: Planning and policydevelopmentMonit
- Page 79: oth western and traditional (i.e. A
- Page 83 and 84: Stockholm Convention</stron
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 44.1 Introduction4.1.1 The
- Page 87 and 88: 4.2.4. Evaluation of achieving targ
- Page 89 and 90: for declaration of PAs, and adoptio
- Page 91 and 92: • Programmes for ex-situ conserva
- Page 93 and 94: The crop wild relatives projectThe
- Page 95 and 96: WetlandsUnder the Wetland Conservat
- Page 97 and 98: active in detecting such illegal ex
- Page 99 and 100: ecause of anthropogenic factors suc
- Page 101 and 102: • Systematic gathering of atmosph
- Page 103 and 104: egion for over a week (Arulpragrasa
- Page 105 and 106: FOCAL AREA: MAINTAIN GOODS AND SERV
- Page 107 and 108: FisheriesThe national marine fisher
- Page 109 and 110: • Health and well being of rural
- Page 111 and 112: • The MoENR has formulated a nati
- Page 113 and 114: 4.3 Impact of NBSAPs and related se
- Page 115 and 116: Strategic goalsScale ofagreementSri
- Page 117 and 118: Strategic goalsScale ofagreementSri
- Page 119 and 120: Ministry of Environment & Natural R
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix II - Further sources of in
- Page 123 and 124: 62. Fernando, N. (1997) A Personnal
- Page 125 and 126: 133. MoENR, 2007b. The Thematic Ass
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix IIIProgress towards Target
- Page 129 and 130: .2.1 Protected Areas under the DWLC
- Page 131 and 132:
National Target (NCSA 3 5.7, 2007)I
- Page 133 and 134:
disturbance by over-visitation and
- Page 135 and 136:
PoWPA Target: By 2008, sufficient f
- Page 137 and 138:
Project (2001-2008)Other Policies,
- Page 139 and 140:
There is no overall policy to guide
- Page 141 and 142:
The ADB funded Forest Resources Man
- Page 143 and 144:
Status of actions taken/in progress
- Page 145 and 146:
The Community Participation Project
- Page 147 and 148:
B.4.8 PoWPA Goal 3.2 - To build cap
- Page 149 and 150:
B.5 Overview of obstacles for imple