TABLE 4.4: Trends in deforestati<strong>on</strong> and reforestati<strong>on</strong>YearNumber of forestoffences recodedVolume of illegaltimberDetected (cu m)1998 4193 25891999 3928 29122000 4626 56622001 4344 42012002 4157 45272003 3093 27892004 2842 44662005 2758 33342006 2797 26022007 1097 884Source: Central Bank Annual Report for 2007 (2008)• Trends in deforestati<strong>on</strong> andreforestati<strong>on</strong>With regard to illegal activities in forests,there has been a decrease in forest offencesand illegal timber detecti<strong>on</strong>s (Table 4.4)despite increased m<strong>on</strong>itoring. This has beenfacilitated by boundary demarcati<strong>on</strong> of forestreserves and a move towards participatoryforest management in selected areas (seeAppendix III).Coral is the principal source of quicklime for SriLanka’s c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> industry, supplyingapproximately 90% of the lime in use. Part of this issupplied by sea coral mining. Most records of seacoral mining are from the west and south coastalareas.Sea coral removal has declined in the coastalstretch between Ambalangoda and Dickwellafrom 7,660 t<strong>on</strong>s in 1984 to 4,020 and 2,200t<strong>on</strong>s respectively in 1994 and 1998, due tobetter law enforcement (CZMP, 2004). TheCoast C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Department also recordsa decrease in beach sand mining in coastalareas from 137,800 m 3 in 1991 to 32000 m 3 in2001 due to better surveillance in the coastalz<strong>on</strong>e, although river sand mining in the majorrivers where this occurs increased from25,00,000 m 3 in 1991 to 40,00,000 m 3 in 2001(CZMP, 2004)• Trends in reducti<strong>on</strong> of chena cultivati<strong>on</strong> and encroachment for cash cropsOver the years there have been several projects in the forest and wildlife sub-sectors to wean local people away fromdestructive practices such as chena cultivati<strong>on</strong> in the Dry Z<strong>on</strong>e and encroachment for tea cultivati<strong>on</strong> in the Wet Z<strong>on</strong>e.Examples are the Protected Area Management and Wildlife C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Project carried out by the DWLC (2001-2008);the GEF funded Southwest Rainforest Project; The GEF/UNDP funded Southwest Rainforest C<strong>on</strong>servati<strong>on</strong> Project of theForest Department (2000-2006); and The Aus-Aid funded Sri Lanka Australia Natural Resources Management Project(SLANRMP) of the Forest Department (2003-2008). These projects have been successful in pilot testing approaches towean people away from destructive agricultural practices through community participati<strong>on</strong>, and the establishment ofmicro-credit schemes for improved livelihoods and training. However, these approaches need to be more widelyimplemented to benefit all forested areas in the country.• Trends in the human elephant c<strong>on</strong>flictForest clearing in the Dry Z<strong>on</strong>e for agriculture and settlements have caused disrupti<strong>on</strong> of elephant migrati<strong>on</strong> routesleading to severe human–elephant c<strong>on</strong>flict. This has increased over the years with at least about 50 human deaths and150-195 elephant deaths per year over the past 15 years (MoENR, 2009), in additi<strong>on</strong> to large scale damage to crops andhuman habitati<strong>on</strong>s (Nati<strong>on</strong>al Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Outlook, 2006).• Trends in populati<strong>on</strong> densityWhile populati<strong>on</strong> density in Sri Lanka’s Dry Z<strong>on</strong>e is 170/km 2 , density in the biodiversity-rich south-western Wet Z<strong>on</strong>e is650/ km 2 (MoENR, 2009). A burge<strong>on</strong>ing human populati<strong>on</strong> in the island has compounded the loss of biodiversity,Fourth Nati<strong>on</strong>al Report to the CBD: Sri Lanka 90
ecause of anthropogenic factors such as habitat degradati<strong>on</strong>/modificati<strong>on</strong>, over-exploitati<strong>on</strong> of species, spread ofinvasive alien species and polluti<strong>on</strong>.FOCAL AREA FOR ASSESSMENT 3: ADDRESS THREATS TO BIODIVERSITYGoal 6. C<strong>on</strong>trol threats from invasive alien speciesGlobal Target6.1. Pathways for major potential alien invasive species c<strong>on</strong>trolled.6. 2. Management plans in place for major alien species that threaten ecosystems, habitats or species.Nati<strong>on</strong>al targets• A nati<strong>on</strong>al database <strong>on</strong> alien invasive species established. 2• Enhance capacity for entry, establishment, eradicati<strong>on</strong> and management of invasive species in general andformulate management strategies for specific alien invasive species that threaten key ecosystems. 2• Reducti<strong>on</strong> of accidental and intenti<strong>on</strong>al introducti<strong>on</strong> of AIS. 1Focal Area Global Indicators Additi<strong>on</strong>al nati<strong>on</strong>al indicatorsThreats to biodiversity • Trends in invasive alien species. • Mechanism in place for preventi<strong>on</strong> ofentry, establishment and eradicati<strong>on</strong>of IAS. 2• Trends related to spread of invasive alien speciesThe introducti<strong>on</strong> and spread of invasive alien species (IAS) is a growing c<strong>on</strong>cern in Sri Lanka, with several species ofexotic fauna and flora well established in wild habitats over the past two decades, and threatening native biodiversity(Bambaradeniya, 2002). About 20 species of invasive alien fauna and 39 species of invasive alien flora are documentedfrom natural and semi-natural ecosystems in the different bioclimatic z<strong>on</strong>es of Sri Lanka (Bambaradeniya, 2002), andother new species of alien invasive species have been discovered over the past 6 years (Mordan et al., 2003).• Mechanisms in place for preventi<strong>on</strong> of entry, establishment and eradicati<strong>on</strong> of IAS.The agricultural sector is resp<strong>on</strong>sible for quarantine activities and the preventi<strong>on</strong> of alien invasive species entering thecountry as per legal provisi<strong>on</strong>s at the nati<strong>on</strong>al level. The Plant Protecti<strong>on</strong> Act No. 35 of 1999 makes provisi<strong>on</strong> forpreventing the introducti<strong>on</strong> of weeds, insects, pests and diseases that would pose a threat to plants in Sri Lanka,particularly the crops. All imported plants and animals, or their parts, are thus required to be declared at the point ofentry to the country and should be subject to quarantine regulati<strong>on</strong>s.The Plant Protecti<strong>on</strong> and Quarantine Divisi<strong>on</strong> of the AgricultureDepartment, through the Plant Quarantine Service can, in accordancewith the Plant Protecti<strong>on</strong> Act No 35 of 1999:• restrict or prohibit the importati<strong>on</strong> into Sri Lanka of any plants,plants products and organisms.• restrict or prohibit the landing in Sri Lanka of plants, plantproducts and organisms, either absolutely or c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ally.revisi<strong>on</strong>.All imported seed should be certified by the Nati<strong>on</strong>alPlant Quarantine Service and the Seed Certificati<strong>on</strong> andPlant Protecti<strong>on</strong> Centre of the Department of Agricultureprior to release or use within the country. Species (orparts of species) that are perceived as probable sourcesof pathogens, or potential invasives have been listed inrelati<strong>on</strong> to any adverse impact <strong>on</strong> plants, although thislist is by no means comprehensive, and is still underAlthough Sri Lanka as an island is highly vulnerable to alien species invasi<strong>on</strong>s and the severe repercussi<strong>on</strong>s they couldhave <strong>on</strong> the fishery, agriculture, wild biodiversity and hence the nati<strong>on</strong>al ec<strong>on</strong>omy, c<strong>on</strong>trol measures for preventi<strong>on</strong> ofentry and establishment of invasive species are perceived as inadequate. The problem is compounded due to themagnitude of checking all imports that may carry invasive species, given the limited customs and quarantine staffavailable for this activity and the lack of skills for identificati<strong>on</strong> of potential invasive species at the points of arrival.C<strong>on</strong>trol of IAS has also been initiated in PAs under the DWLC where c<strong>on</strong>siderable areas has been affected. Here too,the capacity for identificati<strong>on</strong> and c<strong>on</strong>trol are not optimal, but there has been special c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong> of IASmanagement in six PAs managed by the DWLC <strong>on</strong> a pilot scale under the recently c<strong>on</strong>cluded PAM&WC Project. Thisinvolved removal of IAS from an area totalling 8,166.8 ha for habitat enrichment, and all areas affected by invasiveFourth Nati<strong>on</strong>al Report to the CBD: Sri Lanka 91
- Page 1 and 2:
Fourth Country Report from Sri Lank
- Page 3:
Cover photo credits•••• Gra
- Page 6 and 7:
Chapter 22.1 Introduction ……392
- Page 8:
List of figuresFigure 1.1 Map of Sr
- Page 11 and 12:
Baseline Biodiversity Survey (BBS)
- Page 13 and 14:
through skills building for reporti
- Page 15:
Chapter 11.1 IntroductionThis chapt
- Page 19 and 20:
Figure 1.2: Major climatic zones ba
- Page 21 and 22:
Evolutionary significance of Sri La
- Page 23 and 24:
1.3 Species diversity1.3.1 StatusSr
- Page 25 and 26:
.11 Coastal and marine ecosystemsTA
- Page 27 and 28:
wetland habitats (MALF, 1995; IUCN
- Page 29 and 30:
Dry monsoon forests (Figure 1.3) lo
- Page 31 and 32:
woody species and faunal diversity
- Page 33 and 34:
TABLE 1.7: Trends in detection of i
- Page 35 and 36:
Bank, 2008), and are distributed th
- Page 37 and 38:
salt marshes occur along the coast
- Page 39 and 40:
Sri Lanka also has a range of cerea
- Page 41 and 42:
TABLE 1.8: Germplasm Collection Sta
- Page 43 and 44:
Soil erosion is extremely high in t
- Page 45 and 46:
1.8.5 Impact of changes in biodiver
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 22.1 IntroductionSri Lanka
- Page 49: • The importance of Communication
- Page 53 and 54: 2.2.5 Institutional arrangements fo
- Page 55 and 56: problem for non-implementation of t
- Page 57 and 58: Key threats Specific issue Statusco
- Page 59 and 60: Key threats Specific issue StatusSp
- Page 61 and 62: TABLE 2.2: Major donor funded proje
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 33.1 IntroductionThe Confer
- Page 65 and 66: Primary Stakeholders*Secondary stak
- Page 67 and 68: laws concerning access to genetic r
- Page 69 and 70: TABLE 3.3: Integration of biodivers
- Page 71 and 72: Area of purviewPolicies / plans/ la
- Page 73 and 74: Overall, biodiversity consideration
- Page 75 and 76: SectorInstitutions, mandates and na
- Page 77 and 78: Planning and policydevelopmentMonit
- Page 79 and 80: oth western and traditional (i.e. A
- Page 81 and 82: the need for a mechanism to impleme
- Page 83 and 84: Stockholm Convention</stron
- Page 85 and 86: Chapter 44.1 Introduction4.1.1 The
- Page 87 and 88: 4.2.4. Evaluation of achieving targ
- Page 89 and 90: for declaration of PAs, and adoptio
- Page 91 and 92: • Programmes for ex-situ conserva
- Page 93 and 94: The crop wild relatives projectThe
- Page 95 and 96: WetlandsUnder the Wetland Conservat
- Page 97: active in detecting such illegal ex
- Page 101 and 102: • Systematic gathering of atmosph
- Page 103 and 104: egion for over a week (Arulpragrasa
- Page 105 and 106: FOCAL AREA: MAINTAIN GOODS AND SERV
- Page 107 and 108: FisheriesThe national marine fisher
- Page 109 and 110: • Health and well being of rural
- Page 111 and 112: • The MoENR has formulated a nati
- Page 113 and 114: 4.3 Impact of NBSAPs and related se
- Page 115 and 116: Strategic goalsScale ofagreementSri
- Page 117 and 118: Strategic goalsScale ofagreementSri
- Page 119 and 120: Ministry of Environment & Natural R
- Page 121 and 122: Appendix II - Further sources of in
- Page 123 and 124: 62. Fernando, N. (1997) A Personnal
- Page 125 and 126: 133. MoENR, 2007b. The Thematic Ass
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix IIIProgress towards Target
- Page 129 and 130: .2.1 Protected Areas under the DWLC
- Page 131 and 132: National Target (NCSA 3 5.7, 2007)I
- Page 133 and 134: disturbance by over-visitation and
- Page 135 and 136: PoWPA Target: By 2008, sufficient f
- Page 137 and 138: Project (2001-2008)Other Policies,
- Page 139 and 140: There is no overall policy to guide
- Page 141 and 142: The ADB funded Forest Resources Man
- Page 143 and 144: Status of actions taken/in progress
- Page 145 and 146: The Community Participation Project
- Page 147 and 148: B.4.8 PoWPA Goal 3.2 - To build cap
- Page 149 and 150:
B.5 Overview of obstacles for imple