10.07.2015 Views

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>State</strong> of GeorgiaFederal Awards Findings and Questioned CostsFor the <strong>Fiscal</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>Ended</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>30</strong>, <strong>2012</strong>Management did not provide any documentation or satisfactory explanation in support of theseexpenditures.Criteria:Information:Cause:Effect:OMB Circular A-87 states, "A cost is allocable to a particular cost objective if the goods or servicesinvolved are chargeable or assignable to such cost objective in accordance with relative benefitsreceived... and any cost allocable to a particular Federal award or cost objective under the principlesprovided for in this Circular may not be charged to other Federal awards to overcome funddeficiencies, to avoid restrictions imposed by law or terms of the Federal awards, or for other reasons."The Department charged an average of $288,100 in personal services expenditures to the WIA clusterprogram for the months of July through November 2011 and February through <strong>June</strong> <strong>2012</strong>. TheDepartment charged $1,142,915 of personal services for the month of December 2011 and charged$1,231,057 of personal services for the month of January <strong>2012</strong>. We noted this large difference andinquired with the Department as to the cause of the significant variance. We received no supportingdocumentation or sufficient explanation to prove the allocability of the personal service charges to theWIA cluster program; and therefore, were unable to determine a projected question cost amount.The Department's failure to have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure documentationand information supporting the allocation of personal service charges to the WIA cluster program wasavailable for review.Personal service expenditures were apparently allocated to the WIA cluster program without adequatesupporting documentation resulting in noncompliance with OMB Circular A-87. In addition, failure toadhere to OMB Circular A-87 could result in the reporting of inaccurate information.Recommendation: The Department should implement sufficient internal control procedures to adhere to OMB Circular A-87 cost principles and ensure that personal service charges being allocated to Federal awards andprograms are fully supported by adequate documentation.Finding Control Number: FA-440-12-03ALLOWABLE COSTS/COST PRINCIPLESQuestionable ExpendituresWIA Dislocated Workers (CFDA 17.260)WIA Dislocated Worker Formula Grants (CFDA 17.278)U.S. Department of LaborGrant Awards: <strong>Year</strong> 2011 - AA- 21390-11-55-A-13; <strong>Year</strong> 2010 - AA-20189-10-55-A-13Condition:Criteria:A review of the expenditures charged to the Workforce Investment Act (WIA) cluster programrevealed that the Department of Labor (Department) failed to follow the OMB Circular A-87guidelines for allocable program expenditures. We noted eight (8) transactions totaling 11,072.12were not allocable to the Federal program or adequately documented.Provisions of OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for Local, <strong>State</strong> and Indian Tribal Governments,require that "to be allowable under Federal awards, costs must be…allocable to Federal awards underthe provisions of this Circular." and "be adequately documented".Questioned Cost: $11,072.12Information:A review of the expenditures revealed that seven (7) of the eight (8) questionable expenditures lackedadequate documentation. In reviewing the accounts that the expenditures were charged to, we notedthat the expenditures were moved from the Employment Service Cluster (17.ESC) to the WIA clusterprogram. The Department could not provide evidence of the allocability of the expenditures to theWIA program.Additionally, we noted one (1) transaction was charged to the Rapid Response program, which is astatewide program within the Dislocated Worker program that is not allocable to the WIA cluster104

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!