10.07.2015 Views

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

Single Audit Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 - State ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>State</strong> of GeorgiaFederal Awards Findings and Questioned CostsFor the <strong>Fiscal</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>Ended</strong> <strong>June</strong> <strong>30</strong>, <strong>2012</strong>Subrecipient Monitoring could result in improper program costs being reimbursed to subrecipients andnoncompliance with Federal regulations.Recommendation:The Department of Transportation should develop, implement, and formally document policies andprocedures over Subrecipient Monitoring to ensure that the A-133 compliance requirements areconsistently followed and documented for subrecipients of Highway Planning and ConstructionCluster funds.Finding Control Number: FA-484-12-06SUBRECIPIENT MONITORINGInadequate Subrecipient Monitoring DocumentationFederal Transit_Capital Investment Grants (CFDA 20.500)Federal Transit_Formula Grants (CFDA 20.507)Formula Grants for Other Than Urbanized Areas (CFDA 20.509)U.S. Department of TransportationGrant Awards: <strong>Year</strong> <strong>2012</strong> - GA-18-X032; GA-90-X<strong>30</strong>9; <strong>Year</strong> 2011 - GA-18-X031; GA-90-X286; <strong>Year</strong> 2010 - GA-04-X0<strong>30</strong>; GA-90-X259; GA-18-X0<strong>30</strong>; <strong>Year</strong> 2009 - GA-04-X013; GA-04-X017; GA-18-X029; GA-57-X006; GA-86-X001;GA-96-X012; <strong>Year</strong> 2008 - GA-03-X089; GA-04-X006; GA-04-X028; GA-18-X028; GA-90-X242; <strong>Year</strong> 2006 - GA-03-X086; <strong>Year</strong> 1999 - GA-03-X058Condition:Criteria:Our examination of Subrecipient Monitoring for the Formula Grants for Other Than Urbanized Areasprogram (CFDA No. 20.509) and Federal Transit Cluster (CFDA No. 20.500 and 20.507) disclosedthat the Department of Transportation's Office of Intermodal failed to maintain adequatedocumentation of risk assessments and compliance reviews of subrecipients. As a result, we wereunable to determine if the risk assessments and compliance reviews were effective during-the-awardmonitoring procedures.Section 7502 of the <strong>Single</strong> <strong>Audit</strong> Act of 1996 provides that each pass-through entity shall monitor thesubrecipient's use of Federal awards through site visits or other means to provide reasonable assurancethat the subrecipient administers Federal awards in compliance with laws, regulations, and theprovisions of contracts or grant agreements.According to Sections 5<strong>30</strong>7 and 5311 of the Office of Intermodal's Program Procedures Manual,"GDOT Intermodal Programs Division through the Transit Program Manager and Transit ProgramCoordinators is responsible for performance of an assessment to identify subrecipient risk on an annualbasis, in May-<strong>June</strong> of each year. Full Compliance Monitoring Reviews will be performed as neededby the Transit Program Coordinator based on the results of the risk assessment. For high risksubrecipients, compliance reviews will be performed within 90 days of findings of noncompliance ordetermination of high risk. For medium risk subrecipients, reviews will be performed every two (2)years. Complete compliance reviews are conducted by GDOT Program Transit Coordinator everythree (3) years for low risk. The Transit Program Manager must keep subrecipient assessments in acentral repository for tracking, reporting and historical risk assessment information. All relevantinformation relating to the oversight of each subrecipient should be maintained in such manner as to beeasily and quickly identified, complete, and readily available for use."Cause:Effect:Recommendation:The Office of Intermodal was unable to provide adequate documentation of risk assessments andcompliance reviews.Inadequate Subrecipient Monitoring documentation increases the risk that the Office of Intermodal willnot be able to prevent or detect instances where subrecipients fail to use awards for authorizedpurposes, comply with laws, regulations, and the provisions of contracts or grant agreements, andachieve performance goals.The Office of Intermodal should review their current internal control procedures for SubrecipientMonitoring and implement additional procedures, as needed, to ensure that risk assessments and117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!