10.07.2015 Views

Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

Audit of Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities in ... - SA HealthInfo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4.1. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> staff at substance abuse treatment facilitiesVariations <strong>in</strong> the mean number <strong>of</strong> staff by staff<strong>in</strong>g category for the overall sample and byprov<strong>in</strong>ce are presented <strong>in</strong> Table 6. For the overall sample, the number <strong>of</strong> full-timepr<strong>of</strong>essional staff (i.e. staff responsible for treatment services) ranges from 0 to 20 people(χ = 5.4, SD = 5.2) and the total number <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional full-time staff (such assupport staff, adm<strong>in</strong>istrators and clean<strong>in</strong>g staff) ranges from 0 to 11 (χ = 2.5, SD = 3.8).In addition to full-time staff, many facilities employ sessional pr<strong>of</strong>essionals on a parttimebasis. For the overall sample, the number <strong>of</strong> part-time staff per facility ranges from0 to 10 (χ = 2.9, SD = 3.4).Table 6. Mean number <strong>of</strong> staff per staff<strong>in</strong>g category.Staff category Free State(N = 7)Limpopo(N = 2)Mpumalanga(N = 3)North West(N = 2)Northern Cape(N = 2)Overall(N = 16)χ SD χ SD χ SD χ SD χ SD χ SDPr<strong>of</strong>essional (full-time) 3.7 3.1 1.5 0.7 10.0 8.7 11.0 0.0 3.0 1.4 5.4 5.2Non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 3.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 2.5 3.8(full-time)Part-time staff 5.3 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 0.6 2.0 0.0 0.5 0.7 2.9 3.4The total number <strong>of</strong> full-time pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff ranges from 0 to 8 (χ = 3.7, SD = 3.1) <strong>in</strong>Free State; from 1 to 2 (χ = 1.5, SD = 0.7) <strong>in</strong> Limpopo; from 4 to 20 (χ = 10.0, SD = 8.7)<strong>in</strong> Mpumalanga; 11 (χ = 11.0, SD = 0.0) <strong>in</strong> North West; and from 2 to 4 (χ = 3.0, SD =1.4) <strong>in</strong> Northern Cape. The number <strong>of</strong> non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional full-time staff per facility rangesfrom 0 to 1 (χ = 0.5, SD = 0.7) <strong>in</strong> Limpopo; from 3 to 4 (χ = 3.5, SD = 0.7) <strong>in</strong>Mpumalanga; and from 0 to 1 (χ = 0.5, SD = 0.7) <strong>in</strong> Northern Cape. <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>in</strong> FreeState and North West do not employ non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff on a full-time basis. Thenumber <strong>of</strong> part-time staff per facility ranges from 0 to 10 (χ = 5.3, SD = 4.0) <strong>in</strong> FreeState; from 1 to 2 (χ = 1.3, SD = 0.6) <strong>in</strong> Mpumalanga; 2 (χ = 2.0, SD = 0.0) <strong>in</strong> NorthWest; and from 0 to 1 (χ = 0.5, SD = 0.7) <strong>in</strong> Northern Cape. <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>in</strong> Limpopo do notemploy part-time staff.Table 7 presents the mean number <strong>of</strong> staff per staff<strong>in</strong>g category for the overall sampleand by prov<strong>in</strong>ce. Few facilities employ pr<strong>of</strong>essional staff, such as psychologists andpsychiatrists. <strong>Facilities</strong> <strong>in</strong> Free State and North West are more likely to have access to37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!